• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

lokomoko

Major
83 Badges
Apr 28, 2012
786
18
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Magicka
  • Cities in Motion 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Rome Gold
  • Semper Fi
  • Sengoku
  • Stellaris: Synthetic Dawn
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • March of the Eagles
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Europa Universalis IV: Third Rome
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Knights of Honor
  • For the Motherland
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • 500k Club
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
I've been playing both Total War: Shogun 2 and Sengoku recently, and I've picked up on a slight inconsistency. The title 'Daimyo' - as it says on Wikipedia - is ranked second only to the Shogun, whereas in Sengoku they're vassals to the clan leaders, whose title is 'leader' per se. Is there anything I'm missing here, or has Sengoku needed to falsify the titles just to make the hierarchy system more complex?
 
I think it is a function of the game rather than a reflection of actual history. Here is another thread with the same question. The OP was never truly satisfied by the answers.

I look at the clans as an alliance of one family with other subordinate daimyo from that family or others united under a single banner. This works for me, as when you subdue other clans, the families often appear in your court, can hold titles, including daimyo, but are part of your clan.

I would like a definitive answer, but it may not come.
 
Here's your definitive answer :) (don't know how I missed the original thread)-you can be considered a daimyo and still be in service to a more powerful daimyo in the Muromachi/Sengoku period (things changed in the Edo period). "Clans" is actually a very poor way to describe the Oda, Hojo, Takeda, etc-in academia they're usually referred to as 'houses' because most of the vassals aren't related by blood. So in the 'house of Oda' you have many daimyo-Shibata, Maeda, Hashiba, Akechi, Sassa, etc. Even houses like the Hojo had daimyo under them like the Chiba. Back in the late Heian/early Kamakura, this ends up confusing a lot of people. You may have seen the name 'Minamoto' equated with 'Genji' clan or the Taira equated with 'Heike/Heishi'. However, Minamoto/Taira are the clan names, and Genji/Heike represent the houses of which these clans were leaders. Because of this, you would see Taira families that were Genji or Minamoto families that were Heike. Just like in Sengoku, blood ties were no guarantee for being allied. So when you see 'Clan', think 'House of' instead.

So in game terms, Sengoku uses 'clan' as 'house'. The clan leaders are indeed daimyo, but the game needed a way to set them apart from the lower ranked daimyo and used 'clan' instead of something like 'uji' (the developers told me they wanted to use as little Japanese terminology as possible in order to keep things less confusing to the game's largely Western playerbase).
 
I look at the clans as an alliance of one family with other subordinate daimyo from that family or others united under a single banner. This works for me, as when you subdue other clans, the families often appear in your court, can hold titles, including daimyo, but are part of your clan.

seems reasonable and clear
 
Here's your definitive answer :) (don't know how I missed the original thread)-you can be considered a daimyo and still be in service to a more powerful daimyo in the Muromachi/Sengoku period (things changed in the Edo period). "Clans" is actually a very poor way to describe the Oda, Hojo, Takeda, etc-in academia they're usually referred to as 'houses' because most of the vassals aren't related by blood. So in the 'house of Oda' you have many daimyo-Shibata, Maeda, Hashiba, Akechi, Sassa, etc. Even houses like the Hojo had daimyo under them like the Chiba. Back in the late Heian/early Kamakura, this ends up confusing a lot of people. You may have seen the name 'Minamoto' equated with 'Genji' clan or the Taira equated with 'Heike/Heishi'. However, Minamoto/Taira are the clan names, and Genji/Heike represent the houses of which these clans were leaders. Because of this, you would see Taira families that were Genji or Minamoto families that were Heike. Just like in Sengoku, blood ties were no guarantee for being allied. So when you see 'Clan', think 'House of' instead.

So in game terms, Sengoku uses 'clan' as 'house'. The clan leaders are indeed daimyo, but the game needed a way to set them apart from the lower ranked daimyo and used 'clan' instead of something like 'uji' (the developers told me they wanted to use as little Japanese terminology as possible in order to keep things less confusing to the game's largely Western playerbase).

Ah I see, that clears it up a lot for me. Thanks! :)