Add Provence and Draguignan to the HRE. They were a part of it until 1482 and the treaty of Arras.
- 15
- 2
- 1
Upvote
0
There's a bit of history to Provence being outside the HRE. In EU3, the province of Provence was in the HRE (and was Provence's capital)... which routinely led to AI France getting itself facewrecked by the Emperor when it tried to reclaim Anjou.Add Provence and Draguignan to the HRE. They were a part of it until 1482 and the treaty of Arras.
To be frank, there need to be more events concerning the fall of HRE: the Swiss leaving, United Provinces declaring independence, so why not add something about Provence by the way? Hell, the game could be even more dynamic with the decay of the empire, with some countries being able to leave if they are not satisfied by the way the league war ended and AI could be taught how and when to remove provinces from HRE.
There's also the somewhat esoteric automatic-dismantle condition, which usually only manifests in connection with weird outcomes to the League War period: no country is eligible to be Emperor.For that matter, the HRE needs to be better reworked so that the only path isn't for it to centralize. That's pretty much all it can do; it can't actually decline in power or authority, just get stuck at something until a player gets fed up and manually dismantles it.
Well that and the things that made it stronger is what really made it weaker. The HRE worked great with the stem duchy system a few very powerful vassals, then when barbarossa dismantled that the entire empire hinged on the strength of the imperial throne and when that failed after the fall of hohenstaufen it all came crashing down. It should be a balance where the emperor should want powerful members while keeping them happy enough not to leave.For that matter, the HRE needs to be better reworked so that the only path isn't for it to centralize. That's pretty much all it can do; it can't actually decline in power or authority, just get stuck at something until a player gets fed up and manually dismantles it.
A strong emperor isn't a strong empire though. The stronger the emperor the more the nobles feel their position is threatened. If you want the empire to be strong you need to restore the nobles faith in the empire which means the emperor giving up power to the system.It sort of makes sense to me, a strong Emperor can protect and reclaim imperial lands along with adding new ones = stronger empire and more reforms.
Meh emperor can't do much but might be able to stop large chunks being eaten so it stagnates with no real advancement.
Weak emperor = France+Scandinavia+Poland eat chunks and the empire is a joke.
http://gallica.bnf.fr/m/ark:/12148/bpt6k937412/f499.item.r=traité d'Arras 1482
The treaty of Arras 1482. I could not find an english or german copy but my friend found one in old french.