The reason I changed the capital province to sunni was strictly gameplay. Changed back at end of sequence. And the slider changes were to make Mysore hard to beat ( which they were most definitely ) but not impossible.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
For Tiger flagname, I used flag made by Khephren but I'm not sure we should use this flag as CoA. I kept the previous elephant CoA. Better idea?Khephren said:
@Garbon: what about:
Code:
command = { type = sleepevent which = 4084084 }
command = { type = sleepevent which = 5725721 }
Last edited:
Thank you, Garbon. I didn't mean to leave them in such a mess - I think you've done a great job with these fixes.Garbon said:
If the Nayakas event is to accomplish anything, we need some relation drops between VIJ and the new vassals or else they'll all be diploannexed within a decade.
Code:
#(1529-1545) The Nayakas
event = {
id = 328100
trigger = {
OR = {
owned = { province = 568 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 572 data = -1 }
owned = { province = 575 data = -1 }
}
NOT = { domestic = { type = centralization value = 7 } }
}
random = no
country = VIJ
name = "EVENTNAME328100" #The Nayakas
desc = "EVENTHIST328100"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = december year = 1529 }
offset = 10
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1545 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME328100A" #Grant them more control
command = { type = independence which = IST }
command = { type = independence which = EDE }
command = { type = independence which = PET }
command = { type = independence which = MYS }
command = { type = independence which = COI }
command = { type = independence which = FAT }
command = { type = independence which = TAN }
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = 1 }
command = { type = remove_countryculture which = lithuanian }
[color=yellow]command = { type = trigger which = } #PET: The Nayakas
command = { type = trigger which = } #EDE: The Nayakas
command = { type = trigger which = } #IST: The Nayakas
command = { type = trigger which = } #MYS: The Nayakas[/color]
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME328100B" #Exert greater control on the outlying regions
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
command = { type = revolt which = 568 } #Mangalore
command = { type = revolt which = 572 } #Pondicherry
command = { type = revolt which = 575 } #Madurai
command = { type = revolt which = -1 }
command = { type = revoltrisk which = 24 value = 5 }
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -2 }
command = { type = remove_countryculture which = lithuanian }
}
}
#(1529-1545) The Nayakas
event = {
id = #triggered by VIJ_328100 A
random = no
country = MYS
name = "EVENTNAME328100" #The Nayakas
desc = "EVENTHIST328100"
#-#
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAMExxxxA" #We shall take greater liberties from now on
command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -100 }
}
}
#(1529-1545) The Nayakas
event = {
id = #triggered by VIJ_328100 A
random = no
country = PET
name = "EVENTNAME328100" #The Nayakas
desc = "EVENTHIST328100"
#-#
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAMExxxxA" #We shall take greater liberties from now on
command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -100 }
}
}
#(1529-1545) The Nayakas
event = {
id = #triggered by VIJ_328100 A
random = no
country = IST
name = "EVENTNAME328100" #The Nayakas
desc = "EVENTHIST328100"
#-#
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAMExxxxA" #We shall take greater liberties from now on
command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -100 }
}
}
#(1529-1545) The Nayakas
event = {
id = #triggered by VIJ_328100 A
random = no
country = EDE
name = "EVENTNAME328100" #The Nayakas
desc = "EVENTHIST328100"
#-#
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAMExxxxA" #We shall take greater liberties from now on
command = { type = INF which = -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -100 }
}
}Shivaji was a bit more active than we currently present.
#-#In 1647 the seventeen-year-old Shivaji began to form the Maratha state with the captures of the region of Pune and the forts of Kondana and Rajgad. Quickly he undermined Bijapur´s authority and established the first Maratha homeland. His reign would also see the capture of several key locales including Bangalore, Vellore and Gingee. Those territories would prove key to the continued existence of the Maratha Empire.
Note than some of these cores are granted in another event in the Maratha file, which I left in as I think it makes sense to have a backup in case this event doesn't fire or choice b is chosen.
Also, changes to the AI file:
Lastly, I push again for Mahrattis to have its name changed to Maratha Empire. While there was debate about whether it should be Maratha Empire or Maratha Confederacy, we shouldn't stick with the worst option, which is what we have now.
Code:
#(1647-1680) Shivaji's Ambition
event = {
id = 216006
random = no
country = MAH
name = "EVENTNAME216006" #Shivaji's Ambition
desc = "EVENTHIST216006"
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1647 }
offset = 60
deathdate = { day = 3 month = april year = 1680 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME216006A" #Shivaji will show us the way
command = { type = treasury value = 100 }
command = { type = land value = 500 }
command = { type = breakvassal which = THE }
command = { type = breakvassal which = HYD }
command = { type = breakvassal which = DAM }
Command = { type = breakvassal which = MOG }
command = { type = relation which = MYS value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = ORI value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = JAI value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = VIJ value = -50 }
command = { type = CAV which = -2 value = 5000 }
command = { type = CAV which = -1 value = 5000 }
[color=yellow]command = { type = INF which = -1 value = 5000 }
command = { type = addcore which = 567 } #Bangalore
command = { type = addcore which = 570 } #Mysore
command = { type = addcore which = 572 } #Pondicherry[/color]
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME216006B" #Don't anger the Muslims for now
command = { type = relation which = MOG value = 100 }
command = { type = relation which = HYD value = 100 }
command = { type = treasury value = 200 }
command = { type = infra value = 500 }
}
}#-#In 1647 the seventeen-year-old Shivaji began to form the Maratha state with the captures of the region of Pune and the forts of Kondana and Rajgad. Quickly he undermined Bijapur´s authority and established the first Maratha homeland. His reign would also see the capture of several key locales including Bangalore, Vellore and Gingee. Those territories would prove key to the continued existence of the Maratha Empire.
Note than some of these cores are granted in another event in the Maratha file, which I left in as I think it makes sense to have a backup in case this event doesn't fire or choice b is chosen.
Also, changes to the AI file:
Code:
#
# Maratha AI
#
# Judge 01-11-2006
# Garbon 12-22-2006
#
expansion = 0
tradingpost = 20
neighbour = 10
enemies = -1
traders = 100
monopoly = 10 #-500
war = 55
ferocity = no
combat = { DAM U02 HYD THE MOG GUJ ORI SYR NAF MLW JAI [color=yellow]VIJ PET[/color] }
base = 0.1
front = 5.0
conquer =
{
enemy = 5.0
supply = 0.1
distance = 1.0
owner = 1.0
notsupply = 1.0
base = 3.0
}
garrison =
{
fortress = 1.0
strategic = 3.0
size = 1.0
supply = 2.0
war = 5.0
}Lastly, I push again for Mahrattis to have its name changed to Maratha Empire. While there was debate about whether it should be Maratha Empire or Maratha Confederacy, we shouldn't stick with the worst option, which is what we have now.
Two events for the building of the Taj Mahal:
#-#In 1631 Shah Jahan, emperor during the Mughal's period of greatest prosperity, was griefstricken when his second and favourite wife, Mumtaz Mahal, died during the birth of their daughter Gauhara Begum, their fourteenth child. Contemporary court chronicles concerning Shah Jahan's grief form the basis of the love story traditionally held as the inspiration for the Taj Mahal.
Construction of the Taj Mahal was begun soon after Mumtaz's death.
#-#The Taj Mahal (sometimes called "the Taj") is generally considered the finest example of Mughal architecture, a style that combines elements of Persian, Turkish, Indian, and Islamic architectural styles. While the white domed marble mausoleum is the most familiar part of the monument, the Taj Mahal is actually an integrated complex of structures. It was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1983 when it was described as a universally admired masterpiece of the world's heritage.
Code:
#(1632) Building of the Taj Mahal
#by Pietercornelis
event = {
id = 230022
trigger = {
owned = { province = 543 } #Delhi
}
random = no
country = MOG
name = "EVENTNAME230022" #Building of the Taj Mahal
desc = "EVENTHIST230022"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1632 }
offset = 360
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1632 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME230022A" #We need it to remember her forever
command = { type = treasury value = -200 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME230022B" #Useless piece of..
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
command = { type = sleepevent which = 230023 } #MOG: Taj Mahal completed
}
}Construction of the Taj Mahal was begun soon after Mumtaz's death.
Code:
#(1648) Taj Mahal completed
#by Pietercornelis
event = {
id = 230023
trigger = {
owned = { province = 543 } #Delhi
event = 230022 #MOG: Building of the Taj Mahal
}
random = no
country = MOG
name = "EVENTNAME230023" #Taj Mahal completed
desc = "EVENTHIST230023"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1648 }
offset = 360
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1648 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME230023A" #We will honour her forever!
command = { type = vp value = 50 }
command = { type = stability value = 1 }
command = { type = relation which = -1 value = 50 }
command = { type = relation which = -1 value = 25 }
command = { type = relation which = -1 value = 25 }
command = { type = relation which = -1 value = 10 }
command = { type = relation which = -1 value = 10 }
command = { type = DIP which = 2 value = 60 }
command = { type = infra value = 500 }
}
}
Last edited:
We already have an event for the Taj Mahal (MOG_6901):
#-#The Emperor wishes to build a magnificent memorial to his late wife, Mumtaz Mahal. He wishes it to be an imposing structure of incredible beauty, something to be talked about around the world for centuries to come. He wishes to hire the best architects and wants to spare no expense in materials. Shall we build this Taj Mahal?
I have no objection for sequence proposed by Pietercornelis but MOG_6901 should be removed in this case, shouldn't it?
Why not a luxury manufactory and more cash needed then, as in MOG_6901?
Any thought?
Btw, there is a typo in deathdates of the proposed events. Year should be +1.
Code:
#(1632-1647) The Taj Mahal
#Bugfix from threadid=39609 - Korath
event = {
id = 6901
trigger = { owned = { province = 543 data = -1 } }
random = no
country = MOG
name = "EVENTNAME6901" #The Taj Mahal
desc = "EVENTHIST6901"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1632 }
offset = 1000
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1647 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME6901A" #Build it!
command = { type = gainmanufactory which = 543 value = luxury } #Agra is in Delhi province# #Delhi
command = { type = stability value = -3 }
command = { type = cash value = -500 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME6901B" #No, we will not waste money on such useless things!
command = { type = stability value = 2 }
command = { type = vp value = -200 }
}
}I have no objection for sequence proposed by Pietercornelis but MOG_6901 should be removed in this case, shouldn't it?
Why not a luxury manufactory and more cash needed then, as in MOG_6901?
Any thought?
Btw, there is a typo in deathdates of the proposed events. Year should be +1.
Last edited:
I agree, more cash should be needed, and a luxury manufactory as a result. But I'd like to keep the two events, instead of one. And I have a problem with the pretty big stab hit in the old event. Whaddaya think?
Of course, the two events are better than the original one. just amend them with cash and luxury factory and it will be fine I think.
Don't forget to mention the removal of MOG_6901.
Don't forget to mention the removal of MOG_6901.
A 'fun' little event for Ahmadnagar.
Code:
#(1628-1630) The Rise of Hamid Khan
event = {
id = 305002
trigger = {
neighbour = MOG
NOT = {
vassal = { country = MOG country = GUJ }
vassal = { country = GUJ country = MOG }
alliance = { country = GUJ country = MOG }
war = { country = GUJ country = MOG }
}
}
random = no
country = U02
name = "EVENTNAME305002" #The Rise of Hamid Khan
desc = "EVENTHIST305002"
#-#Hamid Khan rose to prominence as a favorite of Burhan Nizam Shah III. He also was popular among the masses and classes alike. While competent he was also unscrupulous. Married to a woman serving in the royal harem, the couple conspired to gain control of the king by encouraging him to celebrate his vices. Concerned about Mughal influence in the region, they encouraged their puppet king to make a pre-emptive strike.
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1628 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1630 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME305002A" #We are stronger than the Mughals!
command = { type = war which = MOG }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME305002B" #What a fool, Banish him from court!
command = { type = revolt which = -2 }
command = { type = revoltrisk which = 60 value = 7 }
}
}This event almost never fires as most nations in India are at innovative 3 or higher. I've changed it so that only the most innovative nations will be spared from these revolts. Also, I've created two different events as the effects shouldn't be as harsh on large/non-asian(further away) countries.
The Marathas under the leadership of a brilliant young general by the name of Shivaji have risen in revolt in Maharashtra! Shivaji is a devoted Hindu, as are most of the Marathas. Apparently they have had enough of the Muslim Oppressors. What shall we do to combat these infidels?
Code:
#(1660-1680) [color=limegreen]The Marathi Revolt[/color]
[color=yellow]#by Khephren and Garbon[/color]
event = {
id = 338001
trigger = {
[color=yellow]NOT = {
exists = MAH
domestic = { type = innovative value = 8 }
religion = hinduism
}
OR = {
NOT = { continent = asia }
countrysize = 15
}[/color]
[color=red]NOT = { exists = MAH }
NOT = { domestic = { type = innovative value = 3 } }
NOT = { religion = hinduism }[/color]
}
random = no
province = 550 #Maharashtra
name = "EVENTNAME[color=limegreen]338001[/color]" #The Marathi Revolt
desc = "EVENTHIST[color=limegreen]338001[/color]"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1660 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1680 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3820A" #Crush the Hindu rebels
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 551 } #Khandesh
command = { type = revolt which = 551 } #Khandesh
command = { type = stability value = -[color=limegreen]1[/color] }
[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 1 }[/color]
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = -[color=limegreen]1[/color] }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3820B" #Give in to their demands
command = { type = stability value = -1 }
[color=yellow]command = { type = independence which = MAH }[/color]
[color=red]command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = -3 }
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = 2 }[/color]
}
}
#(1660-1680) The Marathi Revolt
#by Khephren and Garbon
event = {
id = 338418
trigger = {
NOT = {
exists = MAH
domestic = { type = innovative value = 8 }
religion = hinduism
countrysize = 15
}
continent = asia
}
random = no
province = 550 #Maharashtra
name = "EVENTNAME338001" #The Marathi Revolt
desc = "EVENTHIST338001"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1660 }
offset = 30
deathdate = { day = 1 month = january year = 1680 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3820A" #Crush the Hindu rebels
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 550 } #Maharashtra
command = { type = revolt which = 551 } #Khandesh
command = { type = revolt which = 551 } #Khandesh
command = { type = stability value = -3 }
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = INNOVATIVE value = -1 }
}
action_b = {
name = "ACTIONNAME3820B" #Give in to their demands
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
[color=yellow]command = { type = independence which = MAH }[/color]
command = { type = domestic which = CENTRALIZATION value = -2 }
}
}I think it is about time that we get rid of Sikh culture. As was discussed back in 2004, Sikhism is always represented as a culture as we don't have another religious tag that could be used (important bit is that Panjabi would be the appropriate culture, not the religion). Additionally, Sikhism didn't actually exist till the latter part of the 15th century. Lastly, I think that if we switch to Panjabi, we could be justified in giving the Mughals that culture in the Tiger in the Border event or when they capture Delhi. I'm planning a big post about Mughal cultures but until then, I wanted to put forth this name change suggestion.
Sikh -> Panjabi
addendum: With regards to the Sikhs, there are many historical events that we can add to keep that flavor.
Sikh -> Panjabi
addendum: With regards to the Sikhs, there are many historical events that we can add to keep that flavor.
On another cultural remark, I think that Delhi should have its primary culture (hindi) replaced with afghani. One of the Sultanate's issues was that prime positions in the government were given to the Afghans and not to the local populace. This change be implemented in both the 1419 and 1520 scenarios.
I figured I'd just submit here rather than repeat it in the bug report thread in case it's not a bug. I simply cannot understand why the Bijapur Sultanate would be replaced with a muslim Maratha Empire (unless we were assuming that the Marathi people might've been converted to Islam, in which case, triggers should be added). So, here's my submission:
#-#Shivaji was a great general in the service of the last ruler of Bijapur, Sikandar Adil Shah. After the Mughal invasion Bijapur was annexed, but Shivaji escaped and started the fight against the Mughals and Islamic domination in south central India.
Code:
#(1677-1685) The Disintegration of Bahmani Sultanate
event = {
id = 30350
trigger = {
NOT = { exists = MAH }
}
random = no
country = DAM
name = "EVENTNAME30350" #Rise of the Mahrattis
desc = "EVENTHIST30350"
date = { day = 29 month = december year = 1677 }
offset = 3000
deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1685 }
action_a = {
name = "ACTIONNAME30350A" #Surrender to Mahrattis onslaught
command = { type = flagname which = "" }
command = { type = country which = MAH }
[COLOR=Yellow] command = { type = religion which = hinduism }[/COLOR]
command = { type = domestic which = centralization value = -4 }
command = { type = domestic which = land value = 2 }
command = { type = domestic which = offensive value = 1 }
command = { type = domestic which = aristocracy value = 2 }
command = { type = stability value = -2 }
command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 548 value = -15 } #Bombay
command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 549 value = -5 } #Goa
command = { type = province_revoltrisk which = 550 value = -15 } #Maharashtra
}
}I bet it actually is a bug. I didn't make the event and always assumed that the first version (I believe this was originally a Bahmanid event) was some sort of case where the Sultanate managed to peacefully transition into a Maratha state. However, given that the text only references rebelling against islamic powers, I think I was being too generous and there is indeed a missing command to convert to hinduism.
edit: In fact, after tracking down the original events in the EEP, I'm even more convinced that it was a mistake not to include the hindu conversion as there used to be an option b that would make sure the state was sunni through a conversion command.
edit: In fact, after tracking down the original events in the EEP, I'm even more convinced that it was a mistake not to include the hindu conversion as there used to be an option b that would make sure the state was sunni through a conversion command.
Wanted to bring up a glitch I noticed last night with DHL_161005 'The Sultanate Divided'. If chosen option A (ie. independent JUT & KSH) Delhi province goes to JUT, making it weird when MOG occupys Delhi they can annex Delhi state (as per DHL_3919 Battle of Panipat), despite not being at war with them.
Therefore suggest below amendment
OR - a practical but ahistorical solution
Therefore suggest below amendment
Code:
#(1514-1820) The Battle of Panipat
event = {
id = 3919
trigger = {
control = { province = 543 data = MOG }
[COLOR=Yellow]owned = { province = 543 data = -1 }[/COLOR]
}
random = no
country = DLH
name = "EVENTNAME3919" #The Battle of Panipat
desc = "EVENTHIST3919"
#-#
date = { day = 1 month = march year = 1514 }
offset = 0
deathdate = { year = 1820 }OR - a practical but ahistorical solution
Code:
JUT = { #Jaunpur
date = { day = 1 month = january year = 1419 }
expirydate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1545 }
minimum = { 554 }
extra = { [COLOR=Red]543[/COLOR] 544 559 }
capital = 554
group = muslim
religion = sunni
ai = "SmallTrade1.ai"
}
Last edited:
Delhi won't go to Jaunpur in that choice a (ahistorical event mind you) as 543 is listed in the extra line. When you release a vassal, it only gives them the minimum provinces. Extras just become cores.
The one possible issue though is that a revolting Jaunpur could revolt and take Delhi's capital. Because that causes problems with a lot of things, I'd suggesting the revolter change that you highlighted. If we need to, we can just give a revolting Jaunpur a core via event.
Oh and having the owned command is good, but it should be -1 not -2
The one possible issue though is that a revolting Jaunpur could revolt and take Delhi's capital. Because that causes problems with a lot of things, I'd suggesting the revolter change that you highlighted. If we need to, we can just give a revolting Jaunpur a core via event.
Oh and having the owned command is good, but it should be -1 not -2
Not exactly: if any extra is rebels controlled when a minimum province is rebels controlled too and country revolts, extra province will defect at the same time and join the country. In this case, it could even be the capital...Garbon said:
Ok then for both changes then?Garbon said:
What about the event for core? Shouldn't it be a random event since it could fire more than once?
YodaMaster said:
Which would be a consequence of Jaunpur revolting. However, in the case of the event, Jaunpur is released so afaik, the extras aren't included.
YodaMaster said:
Yes, both changes are good for the reasons I stated.
I don't actually think we need an event. Jaunpur doesn't even start off with a core on Delhi (instead it has a permanent cb as the house of Jaunpur was descended from a house of Delhi). I don't think a new dynasty (in the case of a revolting Jaunpur) would actually have a good claim on Delhi so I'd say just delete the extra line and leave it at that.
YodaMaster said:
Wouldn't it be better as an ai event ranging from 1419-1820? Given Jaunpur doesn't have any events I can find, I doubt its a popular choice for players anyway.