• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I think it makes sense to include plausible alternatives. After all, there are post-HYW events for an English victory in the main mod.

My only question is on what basis would the personal union be formed? She didn't have any children with Sforza and left when he died.
Well, wiki says:

She was the younger surviving daughter of Christian II of Denmark and Norway and Isabella of Austria, sister of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V.
So I believe she left because of her ("uncle") emperor's choice to give Milan to his son, Felipe II.

In case of our events I think we could give the alternative dinasty ONLY to action B in MLO_228047 as it was made in case the emperor isn't historical Charles V.
A marriage with Danmark would be mandatory with an ad hoc DAN event between 1533 and 1535.

However the problem is: should Danmark vassalize Milan when Sforza dies in 1535?

Regarding event MLO_228031:

Action C is just a defiance against the Empire of Darth Sidious... ahem.. Charles V and the rebelling Milan should be "stauferiziert"! :D

EDIT: I'll report this post in Italy thread too.
 
Last edited:
Damn! Darth Sidious! I knew it from the first time I saw there was some Palpatine Elector!
This is the first time I see triggers added in the action lines. It's interesting, but it looks weird for a noob like me. Could you explain how that works and what is the advantage ?
 
Damn! Darth Sidious! I knew it from the first time I saw there was some Palpatine Elector!
This is the first time I see triggers added in the action lines. It's interesting, but it looks weird for a noob like me. Could you explain how that works and what is the advantage ?

Well, as per Third Angel's posts in "commands and triggers thread" in ftg modifications subforum:
- a trigger in the first line of the action, if its conditions are not met, it cancels the whole action in the event.
- a trigger in the first line of a command line, if its conditions aren't met, it cancels the command line in the action.

I think it shoud be in the first line to invalidate all following commands in an action but maybe we need some confirmation from the "code engineers".
 
I don't think that triggers work on an individual command basis, they only work on an action level (I recall during development that MM thought it would be overkill to put it on an individual command level).

Also, it was just a setting a stylistic convention that we put "ai_chance" and action triggers near the top portion of actions. You can mix the order up. :p
 
Damn! Darth Sidious! I knew it from the first time I saw there was some Palpatine Elector!
This is the first time I see triggers added in the action lines. It's interesting, but it looks weird for a noob like me. Could you explain how that works and what is the advantage ?

Sure, just treat it like a normal trigger, only that you can put them within an action. Each action is validated against its trigger and will only appear if it meets the requirements of its own trigger. The benefit is that you can often "collapse" the need for multiple alternate events if the description is the same for each.

Here's part of an event from Great Migrations that is assisted greatly by this change.

Code:
    trigger = {
        someof = {
            number = 3
            owned = { province = 385 data = -1 } 
            owned = { province = 379 data = -1 } 
            owned = { province = 376 data = -1 } 
            owned = { province = 411 data = -1 } 
        }
        NOT = { 
            stability = 3 
            domestic = { type = aristocracy value = 4 }
        }
    }

    action_a ={        
        trigger = { 
            owned = { province = 379 data = -1 } 
            NOT = { exists = SOI }
        }            
        name = "Soissons"
        command = { type = stability value = -1 }
        command = { type = capital which = 379 }
        command = { type = country which = SOI } #Soissons
        command = { type = independence which = RHM } #Rheims
        command = { type = independence which = ORL } #Orleans
        command = { type = independence which = PRS } #Paris
        command = { type = trigger which = 42001 }
        command = { type = trigger which = 42002 }
        command = { type = trigger which = 42003 }
    }
    action_b ={
        trigger = { 
            owned = { province = 376 data = -1 } 
            NOT = { exists = RHM }
        }                    
        name = "Rheims"
        command = { type = stability value = -1 }
        command = { type = capital which = 376 }
        command = { type = country which = RHM }
        command = { type = independence which = SOI } #Soissons
        command = { type = independence which = ORL } #Orleans
        command = { type = independence which = PRS } #Paris
        command = { type = trigger which = 42000 }
        command = { type = trigger which = 42002 }
        command = { type = trigger which = 42003 }
    }

Here we have the main trigger and then two individual actions. With action triggers, I can have just one version of the event, rather than one version that fires if RHM AND SOI are non-existing nations, one version that fires if RHM exists and SOI does not, and one version that fires if SOI exists and RHM does not. In the old way, if I only had one event, invariably one of the actions might make no sense (a country can't change its tag if that tag already exists :D).

As you can imagine this used to get more complex the more actions you have in an event. The event shown above actually has 4 action choices and prior to action triggers would have required more than a handful of events to check all the possible combinations.
 
I don't think that triggers work on an individual command basis, they only work on an action level (I recall during development that MM thought it would be overkill to put it on an individual command level).

Also, it was just a setting a stylistic convention that we put "ai_chance" and action triggers near the top portion of actions. You can mix the order up. :p
Well, I tested the new hre province command in event 103 with trigger exists = HEL in the command itself and it did work! How then?

Ok, for the second part.

About the event you posted you reminded to me the chain of HAB events dealing with Death of Emperor Sigmund. We need to cut much there!
 
Well you learn something every day. :D

Something strange which I haven't noticed before. The trigger included in a command lets the last line work only.

An example, with this new trigger (in green) only Savoie is detached from the HRE. the provinces from 389 to 405 are all Italian ones.

Code:
#(1658-1659) Edict of Tolerance
event = {
	id = 103
	name = "EVENTNAME302" #Edict of Tolerance
	desc = "EVENTHIST302"
	#-#

	date = { day = 0 month = january year = 1658 }
	offset = 700
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1659 }

	action_a = {
		name = "OK"
		command = { type = flag which = 5 }
[COLOR="Lime"]		command = {
			trigger = { exists = HEL }
			type = hre which = 388 value = no #Bern
			type = hre which = 1612 value = no #Schwyz
			type = hre which = 389 value = no 
			type = hre which = 390 value = no 
			type = hre which = 391 value = no 
			type = hre which = 400 value = no 
			type = hre which = 401 value = no 
			type = hre which = 402 value = no 
			type = hre which = 404 value = no 
			type = hre which = 405 value = no #Savoie[/COLOR]
		}
	}
}

Starting in the latter part of the 16th century, the Edict of Nantes and other similar legislation aimed to stop religious hostilities by imposing tolerance and mutual recognition of other religious groups. Freedom of religion was not completely forthcoming, the Edict of Nantes was repealed in 1685 by the Edict of Fontainebleau, making Protestantism illegal in France, but a trend towards progress had been set in motion. By the end of the Thirty Year's War, the era of the so called Counter-Reformation was at a close. Concurrent with an increase of religious tolerance, the Treaty of Tordesillas was no longer viewed as an impediment to non-Spanish, non-Portuguese colonization.

I had another test before with only Bern and Schwyz. In this case only Schwiz went out the HRE.
 
Well when have you ever had multiple command lines in one command?

If you wanted to do that my suggestion would be:

Code:
    action_a = {
        trigger = { exists = HEL }
        name = "OK"
        command = { type = flag which = 5 }
        command = { type = hre which = 388 value = no }  #Bern
        command = { type = hre which = 1612 value = no } #Schwyz
        ...
        }
    }
    action_b = {
        trigger = { NOT = { exists = HEL }
        }
        name = "OK"
        command = { type = flag which = 5 }
    }
 
MOVED FROM COORDINATING 1.59 THREAD!

Here are some suggestions using the new FTG coding in current ACGEEP v1.58:

THE INHERITANCE OF NEAPLES 1435


EVENTS 239007 AND 3660 ARE NOW BOTH MERGED in NAP_239007:

EVENT NAP_3660 IS THEN REMOVED

(THERE ARE REFERENCES TO 239007 AND 3660 TO BE FIND OUT IN OTHER EVENTS)



CURRENT 1.58 EVENTS:
Code:
#(1435) The Angevin Inheritance of Naples (historical path)
event = {
	id = 239007
	trigger = {
		NOT = {
			vassal = { country = ARG country = PRO }
		}
		OR = {
			vassal = { country = PRO country = ARG }
			vassal = { country = PRO country = NAP }
			flag = [Angevin]
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = NAP
	name = "EVENTNAME239007" #The Angevin Inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#

	date = { day = 0 month = February year = 1435 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME239007A" #Welcome to Renato, our new King!
		command = { type = breakvassal which = ARG }
		command = { type = breakvassal which = PAP }
		command = { type = relation which = PRO value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 25 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 251039 } #PAP: The Succession in Naples
		command = { type = trigger which = 111011 } #ARG: The Angevins established in Naples
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3660 } #NAP: The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
	}
}

#(1435) The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
#(from 'The Aragon Inheritance of Napoli' Modified for the EEP by Havard)
event = {
	id = 3660
	trigger = {
		exists = ARG
		NOT = {
			vassal = { country = PRO country = ARG }
			event = 239007 #NAP: The Angevin Inheritance of Naples
		}
		OR = {
			vassal = { country = ARG country = PRO }
			vassal = { country = ARG country = NAP }
			flag = [Aragonese]
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = NAP
	name = "EVENTNAME3660" #The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#
	date = { day = 1 month = February year = 1435 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3660A" #Welcome to Alfonso, our new King!
		command = { type = breakvassal which = PAP }
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 096018 } #Alfonso d'Aragona °
		command = { type = sleepmonarch which = 096001 } #Renato d'Angiò
		command = { type = relation which = ARG value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -25 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 251039 } #PAP: The Succession in Naples
	}
}

EVENTHIST3660
#-#Queen Giovanna of Naples is dead. Her last will was that the crown should be given to René of Anjou, brother of Louis III of Anjou, her adopted son who died just three months before she did. Pope Eugenius IV declared that as suzerain he had the right to invest the new King and as for now he would send a bishop as temporary regent. However the Neapolitan people, determined to respect the will of their former Queen, ignored the Papal resolution and sent a delegation to Provence to urge René of Anjou to claim the throne in Naples. Since René of Anjou had been taken captive in Burgundy by Duke Philip the Fair, his wife Isabelle of Lorraine accepted the crown in his place. From his base in Sicily, Alfons of Aragon, who was designated heir by Giovanna between 1420 and 1423, and had a claim to Naples as King of Sicily, gained the support of the Neapolitan nobility hostile to the Anjou dynasty, and started making preparations to invade the Kingdom before the French Angevins could arrive in Naples and take the crown.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Here is the new merged event:
Code:
#(1435) The Inheritance of Naples
#(from 'The Aragon Inheritance of Napoli' 3660 for the EEP by Havard)
event = {
	id = 239007
	random = no
	country = NAP
	name = "EVENTNAME239007" #The Inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST239007"
	#-#

	date = { day = 0 month = February year = 1435 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME239007A" #Welcome to Renato, our new King!
		trigger = {
			NOT = {
				vassal = { country = ARG country = PRO }
			}
			OR = {
				vassal = { country = PRO country = ARG }
				vassal = { country = PRO country = NAP }
				flag = [Angevin]
			}
		}
		command = { 
			trigger = {
				vassal = { country = ARG country = NAP }
			}
			type = breakvassal which = ARG 
		}
		command = { 
			trigger = {
				vassal = { country = PAP country = NAP }
			}
			type = breakvassal which = PAP 
		}
		command = { type = clrflag which = [Aragonese] }
		command = { type = setflag which = [Angevin] }
		command = { type = relation which = PRO value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 25 }
		command = { type = sleepevent which = 3555 } #ARG: The House of Trastamara in Naples NOTE: IN CASE 3555 IS NOT REMOVED!
		command = { type = trigger which = 251039 } #PAP: The Succession in Naples
		command = { type = trigger which = 111011 } #ARG: The Angevins established in Naples
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME239007B" #Welcome to Alfonso, our new King!
		trigger = {
			exists = ARG
			NOT = {
				vassal = { country = PRO country = ARG }
			}
			OR = {
				vassal = { country = ARG country = PRO }
				vassal = { country = ARG country = NAP }
				flag = [Aragonese]
			}
		}
		command = { 
			trigger = {
				vassal = { country = PAP country = NAP }
			}
			type = breakvassal which = PAP 
		}
		command = { type = clrflag which = [Angevin] }
		command = { type = setflag which = [Aragonese] }
		command = { type = wakemonarch which = 096018 } #Alfonso d'Aragona °
		command = { type = sleepmonarch which = 096001 } #Renato d'Angiò
		command = { type = relation which = ARG value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -25 }
		command = { type = trigger which = 251039 } #PAP: The Succession in Naples
	}
}


EVENTS.CSV ENTRIES:

TO BE REMOVED

EVENTNAME3660;The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples;x


TO BE MODIFIED

- from EVENTHISTORY3660 TO EVENTHISTORY239007
- from ACTIONNAME3660A TO ACTIONNAME239007B

EVENTNAME239007;The Angevin Inheritance of Naples;X


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PROVENCE EVENTS ACCORDING TO NAP_239007

event PRO_262007 to be removed because merged with event PRO_262005


CURRENT 1.58 EVENTS:
Code:
#(1435-1442) The Angevin Inheritance of Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 262005
	trigger = {
		NOT = { vassal = { country = NAP country = PRO } }
		exists = NAP
		event = 239007 #NAP: The Angevin Inheritance of Naples
	}
	random = no
	country = PRO
	name = "EVENTNAME262005" #The House of Anjou back to Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#

	date = { day = 2 month = February year = 1435 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 2 month = February year = 1442 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3555A" #Rule it as an independent Kingdom
		command = { type = vassal which = NAP }
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 25 }
	}
}

#(1435-1442) The Aragonese established in Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 262007
	trigger = { event = 3660 } #NAP: The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
	random = no
	country = PRO
	name = "EVENTNAME262007" #The Aragonese established in Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#

	date = { day = 2 month = February year = 1435 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 2 month = February year = 1442 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3363A" #This means war!
		command = { type = relation which = NAP value = -250 }
		command = { type = relation which = ARG value = -100 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = NAP value = 85 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = ARG value = 85 }
	}
}

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the merged event:
Code:
#(1435-1442) The Inheritance of Naples 
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 262005 #testing NAP_239007
	random = no
	country = PRO
	name = "EVENTNAME239007" #The Inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST239007"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = February year = 1435 }
	offset = 15
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = February year = 1442 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME262005A" #The House of Anjou back to Naples
		trigger = {
			NAP = { flag = [Angevin] }
		}
		command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = { vassal = { country = NAP country = PRO } 
				}
			type = vassal which = NAP 
		}
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = 25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 25 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME262005B" #The Aragonese established in Naples
		trigger = {
			NAP = { flag = [Aragonese] }
		}
		command = { type = relation which = NAP value = -250 }
		command = { type = relation which = ARG value = -100 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = NAP value = 85 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = ARG value = 85 }
	}
}


EVENTS.CSV ENTRIES:


TO BE ADDED

ACTIONNAME262005A;The House of Anjou back to Naples;X
ACTIONNAME262005B;The Aragonese established in Naples;X


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

N.B. Here is the problem, the new coding allows one event only to be used, but maybe a triggered event (ARG_111011) is still preferable instead of a double choice event with offset...


CURRENT 1.58 EVENTS:

ARAGON EVENTS ACCORDING TO NAP_239007

to be removed event ARG_3555 and merged into a single event ARG_111011

Code:
#(1435) The Angevins established in Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 111011 #triggered by NAP_239007
	random = no
	country = ARG
	name = "EVENTNAME111011" #The Angevins established in Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3363A" #This means war!
		command = { type = relation which = NAP value = -250 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRO value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -75 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -75 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = NAP value = 85 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = PRO value = 85 }
	}
}

#(1435) The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 3555
	trigger = {
		NOT = { vassal = { country = NAP country = ARG } }
		event = 3660 #NAP: The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
	}
	random = no
	country = ARG
	name = "EVENTNAME3555" #The House of Trastamara in Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST3660"
	#-#

	date = { day = 2 month = February year = 1435 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3555A" #Rule it as an independent Kingdom
		command = { type = vassal which = NAP }
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 }
	}
}

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


1st SUGGESTION: BOTH EVENTS TWEAKED:
Code:
#(1435) The Angevins established in Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 111011 #triggered by NAP_239007 [COLOR=Yellow]A[/COLOR] 
	random = no
	country = ARG
	name = "EVENTNAME111011" #The Angevins established in Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST[COLOR=Yellow]239007[/COLOR]"
	#-#

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3363A" #This means war!
		command = { type = relation which = NAP value = -250 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRO value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -75 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -75 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = NAP value = 85 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = PRO value = 85 }
	}
}

#(1435) The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 3555
	trigger = {
		[COLOR=Red]NOT = { vassal = { country = NAP country = ARG } }
		event = 3660 #NAP: The Aragonese Inheritance of Naples[/COLOR]
		[COLOR=Yellow]event = 239007 #NAP: The Inheritance of Naples[/COLOR]
	}
	random = no
	country = ARG
	name = "EVENTNAME3555" #The House of Trastamara in Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST[COLOR=Yellow]239007[/COLOR]"
	#-#

	date = { day = 2 month = February year = 1435 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME3555A" #Rule it as an independent Kingdom
		[COLOR=Yellow]command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = { vassal = { country = ARG country = NAP } 
				}
			type = vassal which = NAP 
		}[/COLOR]
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 }
	}
}


#----------------------------------------------------------------------------


2ND SUGGESTION: the new merged event:
Code:
#(1435-1442) The Inheritance of Naples 
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 111011 #testing NAP_239007
	random = no
	country = ARG
	name = "EVENTNAME239007" #The Inheritance of Naples
	desc = "EVENTHIST239007"
	#-#

	date = { day = 1 month = February year = 1435 }
	offset = 20
	deathdate = { day = 1 month = February year = 1442 }


	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME111011A" #The Angevins established in Naples
		trigger = {
			NAP = { flag = [Angevin] }
		}
		command = { type = relation which = NAP value = -250 }
		command = { type = relation which = PRO value = -100 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -75 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -75 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = NAP value = 85 }
		command = { type = casusbelli which = PRO value = 85 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME111011B" #The House of Trastamara in Naples
		trigger = {
			NAP = { flag = [Aragonese] }
		}
		command = { 
			trigger = {
				NOT = { vassal = { country = NAP country = ARG } 
				}
			type = vassal which = NAP
		}
		command = { type = relation which = TOS value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = VEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = GEN value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = DAU value = -50 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -50 }
	}
}


The "complete" sequence of the Inheritance of Naples (1419-1442) is still WIP.
 
Here are some modifications to the sequence in which Milan becomes part of Spain.

Since I don't know if the old add/removecore command works with the new add/removecore_national command, I would the suggest to modify all add/removecore commands in Specific Spain event file into add/removecore_national when dealing with 389 Lombardia.


MILAN 1519

Code:
#(1519-1522) The Question of Milan (MLO [COLOR=Red]can[/COLOR] [COLOR=Yellow]could not[/COLOR] exist)
#by Bordic
event = {
	id = 179026
	trigger = {
		OR = {
			emperor = yes
			AND = {
				event = 285221 #SPA: The Question of Milan
				emperor = no
			}
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = HAB
	name = "EVENTNAME179026" #The Question of Milan
	desc = "EVENTHIST285221"
	#-#

	date = { day = 15 month = January year = 1519 }
	offset = 10
	deathdate = { day = 26 month = April year = 1522 }

	action_a = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179026A" #Our Spanish line will rule over Milan
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SPA value = 389 } #Lombardia
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = SPA value = 402 } #Emilia
		command = { type = DIP which = -2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = ADM which = 2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -25 }
		command = { type = relation which = SPA value = 50 }
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = 25 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "ACTIONNAME179026B" #Acknowledge the imperial status of Milan
		command = { type = independence which = MLO }
		command = { type = DIP which = 2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = ADM which = -2 value = 12 }
		command = { type = relation which = FRA value = -15 }
		command = { type = relation which = HEL value = 15 }
		#in case Milan is already independent
		command = { type = [COLOR=Red]se[/COLOR]cedeprovince which = MLO value = 402 } #Emilia
		command = { type = relation which = MLO value = 20 }
	}
}

Should the a decision have Milan province leave the HRE already at that time with the new command?

command = { type = hre which = x value = yes / no }
Adds or removes province x as a part of the Holy Roman Empire.
 
Should the a decision have Milan province leave the HRE already at that time with the new command?

command = { type = hre which = x value = yes / no }
Adds or removes province x as a part of the Holy Roman Empire.

IMO it would be better to use this command in SPA_285222 or in SPA_285108. That is after 1535.
 
IMO it would be better to use this command in SPA_285222 or in SPA_285108. That is after 1535.

O.k. later is better in this case.
 
As my sequence in post #32 was submitted should I continue to revise the complete sequence.

An alternative project which I had in mind was to consolidate the sequence of the succession in Lorraine-Provence (1431-1482). It works good but is a long chain of events.
 
Why don't you make the revision separately. Beta 3 will be out in a few hours.
Don't worry. I am just planning to do it as it isn't for now. I still have to re-learn the scripting code as I have almost forgotten it now.

However those revised events won't change current gameplay, just event merging.
 
@Garbon

About post #32 I said that there could be references to NAP_239007 and ARG_3660 somewhere. Have you checked?
ARG3660 is in the history log of 1520 and 1648 scenarios but it shouldn't as it was the ahistorical path.
historical path was old event 239007. Now with one event only (239007 action A) we could add it and remove 3660 definitively.

My opinion is just adding an event of ARG getting historically Naples in 1442. This event is ARG_111014.

EDIT: please remove references to 3555 in events.csv and in the history log of 1520 and 1648 scenarios
 
Last edited: