• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Of Bastards & Berbers

With the conquest of Salerno, the Duchy of Apulia and Calabria was greatly enriched. The city of Salerno was a rich port from which trade flowed from the surviving Spanish Christians and the Franks across the Mediterranean. Salerno also providing rich recruiting grounds, and Duke Robert was sure that within a few years, he could call up better than a thousand men from the province. The wealth and manpower of Salerno now belonged to the Hautevilles.

Salerno brought with her another gift for the Hautevilles, though perhaps one less welcome. A year after the fall of Salerno, a child was delivered to Robert – a bastard child, the obvious outcome of some of Duke Robert’s trysts during the siege of Salerno. Roger, in many ways Robert’s closest brother, was quick to advise Robert to keep the child. A bastard can be useful in many ways, particularly to an aggressive, expansive power. Later historians would state, with some evidence, that Roger sought to adopt the child as his own. A son that his wife simply could not provide. Robert, who often followed his brother’s wise counsel, brought the child under his roof, and christened him Godfrey.

ASM-Face-Boy.gif

Godfrey de Hauteville, Robert’s bastard

Meanwhile, in Apulia itself, Duke Robert’s brother William, the chancellor, and his wife Judith, who acted as Robert’s steward, engaged in a large-scale building program. Fisheries and forestry’s were built the length of the Apulian coast, as well as Salerno and Messina. William was well-aware of the campaign’s Robert had planned for not only the subjugation of Sicily, but of Capua as well.

With William maintaining the state of the Duchy, Duke Robert now felt free to focus his attentions on Sicily. Ten years ago, in 1059, the Pope Nicholas had attempted to divert the Norman’s attentions from Italy and had declared Robert the ruler of Sicily – if he could but conquer it from the Moslems that controlled it. In 1061, Robert had taken Messina, and had promised the Duchy of Sicily to his younger brother, Roger, when they conquered the island.

Outside of Messina, Sicily was controlled by a series of vassals, who owed their fealty to Murtaza Koury, the King of the Zirids. The Zirids were a fearsome tribe of Berber’s that ruled over what would later be called Algiers, but which they called Ifriqiyah. Murtaza was a great soldier, one of the pre-eminent Moslem soldiers of the day, cunning and cruel. Even Robert’s headstrong nature was checked by his caution in tackling this foe.

ASM-Face-KingZirid.gif

Murtaza Khoury, King of the Zirids

For there could be little doubt that any conquest of Sicily would involve battle with Murtaza. Fiercely protective of his Sicilian possessions, and well aware of the Norman’s interest in Sicily, Murtaza would brook no aggression in the region, and had placed himself at the heart of a powerful alliance consisting of the Zirids, the Fatimids of Egypt and the Emirate of Cordoba. He was well aware that the Christians would prove a dangerous foe, maybe even an impossible one, especially under the command of Robert ‘Guiscard’, and his brother, Roger ‘the Cold’.

For several years, Duke Robert looked to the west, seeking the opportune moment. Murtaza refused to extend himself against the weaker kingdoms surrounding him, nor to attempt to throw back the Normans from Sicily. It had became a stale-mate, neither side willing to make nor able to afford, the first move.

ASM-Map-Zirid-1072.gif

The Realm of the Zirids, 1072

ASM-Legend-Cyrenica.gif
Emirate of Cyrenica
ASM-Legend-Tunisia.gif
Kingdom of Tunisia
ASM-Legend-Apulia.gif
Duchy of Apulia & Calabria
ASM-Legend-Zirid.gif
Kingdom of the Zirids


It was in 1071 that fortune was to smile on Robert Guiscard once again, and the alliance that Murtaza had formed would create the opportunity Robert had so long desired. The Fatimids of Egypt, eager to extend their influence, had sought to eliminate the Orthodox Nubians to their south. It would prove a fierce campaign, and in December of 1071, she called upon her allies to aid her. Murtaza was forced to lead his Zirid’s east, to Egypt, hoping that his remaining forces would be enough to deter a Norman invasion.

They were not.

It was the moment Robert had been waiting for. Summoning Roger, he demanded a grand mobilisation – every troop that he could call up from his own estates, every man his vassals could call – they would all be needed, every one. A swift march bought most of his troops to Salerno in March of 1072, from whence they set sail – not to Sicily, mere miles away, but to Algiers – the home of the Zirids.

Marshall Roger’s plan was simple – to eliminate the Zirids ability to mount a force capable of defending against a future Norman assault on Sicily. Roger was well aware that if the Normans could conquer the Zirid’s homeland, the Berber’s will to fight would be severely tested. He also hoped that Murtaza would be forced to overthrow one of his vassals, which would severely test the loyalties of the others. This, Roger hoped, would precipitate an internal conflict amongst the Zirids – further weakening their ability to stand against the Normans. The vassals, Roger hoped, would then seek separate peaces with the Normans, in an effort to forestall Norman aggression.

They could not.

That had been Roger’s plan. But as military commanders throughout the ages have discovered, no plan survives contact with the enemy. On the day before the fleet left Salerno, William’s spies informed him that the Fatimids had reached an accord with the Nubians, and peace had been achieved. Far from being involved in a war in a distant land, the Zirid’s were returning home.

Hearing this news, Marshall Roger urged caution, but Robert’s passions again overtook him – the fleets would sail, he declared. It would be a race across the Mediterranean to see whom would reach Tunis first.

The War for Algiers had begun.
 
Good update, I await to see the war unfold...

There's only one minor quibble I have about this update :D I quote you:

"But as military commanders throughout the ages have discovered, no plan survives contact with the enemy."

If I had one penny for everytime I saw a version of this... Bill Gates would be a nobody. :D I kinda hate that quote, God help me I don't post it in my aar in a moment of weakness. :D (shudders violently) Kiddin, just kiddin, it happens to be true so it works...hehehehe, it only makes me smile everytime I see it used. It's the seminal quote of tactics so to say, anyway where's my penny? ;)
 
Shaytana said:
Good update, I await to see the war unfold...

There's only one minor quibble I have about this update :D I quote you:

"But as military commanders throughout the ages have discovered, no plan survives contact with the enemy."

If I had one penny for everytime I saw a version of this... Bill Gates would be a nobody. :D I kinda hate that quote, God help me I don't post it in my aar in a moment of weakness. :D (shudders violently) Kiddin, just kiddin, it happens to be true so it works...hehehehe, it only makes me smile everytime I see it used. It's the seminal quote of tactics so to say, anyway where's my penny? ;)

It is a rather plain quote. I was trying to think of a way of saying 'It all went pear-shaped', and that phrase does sum it up beautifully. Be thankful, one of my other efforts ended up as the painful "Plans do not always go according to plan." Gah!
 
Excellent! I do hope that there were no recalcitrant vassals who refused the call to arms. As for plans, who needs plans?
 
VPeric said:
Oooh, dramatic! :D Great update. I can't wait to see how this war turns out. BTW, how many troops do you have?

Well, my notes are not to hand - but I believe I had a little over 4000 at the start of the war.

And none of my vassals complained. Im their daddy :)
 
Heh. No plan survives contact, indeed. That happened to me in my last war, actually: I felt all proud of myself for hitting them while they were gone, and then...they came back. Oy.

Great update, Mike. Here's hoping you smack those Zirids back across the desert.
 
Unfortunately, the next update will be delayed until midweek. I was hoping to have it up tonight, but a nasty accident on the old mountain bike has led to me being wrapped in bandages :) The War will continue on Wednesday night, most likely.

Sorry. I have not entirely ruled out that the Zirids have attempted to 'off' me in RL so as to prevent me eliminating them in-game...
 
Here's to a speedy recovery. One trusts the Zirids will be suitably chastised?
 
Of Cities & Sons

In April of 1072, Robert ‘Guiscard’ landed at Tunis, several miles south of the city. The War for Algiers had begun in earnest. Shortly after his arrival, his troops broke into two equal detachments of just under two-thousand men each. One detachment he took command of himself, and led them north to lay siege to the city of Tunis itself.

The second detachment was given to his vassal, Guido Farnese, the Bishop of Reggio. Troops called up from the Bishops lands represented the majority of this second detachment, but actual command of the troops was granted to Bohemond de Hauteville, Robert’s discarded son from his first marriage.

ASM-FullFace-Bohemund.gif

Bohemund de Hauteville, Son of Robert 'Guiscard'

Bohemond, like his brothers Roger Borsa and Godfrey, had undergone martial training from a young age. Four years older than Roger Borsa, and eleven years older than Godfrey, he showed incredible promise. Only fifteen at the time of his command, he would swiftly prove himself a brilliant strategist. He would be defeated in only one engagement during the war, by Murtaza the Cruel himself.

Taking command of the Bishop’s troops, he led them south to Mahdia where he began a second siege. Mahdia’s position on the end of a promontory, with walls over ten meters thick would prove a difficult city to take. Robert had no doubt however that his son was the equal of the task.

The Normans now awaited the arrival of the Zirids, returning from Egypt, and braced themselves for combat. However, combat was not to come as reports began to arrive stating that Murtaza had landed instead at Messina, where he had lain siege to the city. Messina was lightly defended, the majority of her troops having joined Robert’s army.

Both Robert and his marshal, Roger, were now faced with a decision. They were well aware what cruelties Murtaza would inflict upon the Christian populace of Messina, should he capture the city. Should they then lift the siege of Tunis, sail east and attempt to break Murtaza’s siege of Messina? Or should they remain in Tunis, and focus on capturing the Zirid capital?

Both men were well aware that it was unlikely that the Zirids would leave their lands this undefended again. God had granted them an opportunity to strike a blow against the infidels, and He was not to be denied. In the end, both men agreed to continue the siege. For all intents and purposes, Messina had been abandoned by the Normans.

Thus, when Murtaza captured Messina a few months later, he spared no effort in slaughtering the Christian populace. The Zirid Massacre, as it came to be known, was relentless in its application and legendary in its cruelty. Murtaza had the Christian populace brutally tortured before hanging them, still alive in many cases, from the walls facing the Italian mainland. It would later be said that the dying cries of his victims could be heard across the straight in Reggio itself.

In response to this atrocity, both Robert’s forces in Tunis, and Bohemond’s troops in Mahdia redoubled their efforts, and both cities swiftly fell to the Normans. Robert sacked the city of Tunis, and literally decimated the male populace – one in every ten males was killed in retribution for Messina. Marshall Roger had pleaded with his brother for calm, but the Guiscard’s passions had taken control, and he ordered the decimation with pleasure. To the south, Bohemond maintained control of his troops, who despite engaging in the traditional three days of looting, did not massacre the local populace.

With the fall of the cities, Murtaza found himself in a dangerous position. Whilst he had gained control of Messina, he had lost both Tunis and Mahdia to the Normans. Bizerte remained free, but with Robert ‘Guiscard’ marching on it it would not remain so for long. Murtaza had considered crossing the straight to Reggio, and laying siege to the Normans there, but the prospect of losing Bizerte was too much. He would have to defeat the Normans on his own soil before he could reclaim his lands. Then Robert ‘Guiscard’ would learn why he was called the Cruel.

In early 1073, Murtaza set sail for his homelands. The first clash between the Normans and the Zirids would not be far off.

ASM-Map-1073.gif

The progress of War, 1073


ASM-Legend-Cyrenica.gif
Emirate of Cyrenica
ASM-Legend-Tunisia.gif
Kingdom of Tunisia
ASM-Legend-Apulia.gif
Duchy of Apulia & Calabria
ASM-Legend-Zirid.gif
Kingdom of the Zirids
 
Excellent update. I hope this means you're better? You certainaly do have a way to build up the story.
 
stnylan: Yes, fully recovered. My only reasons for delaying now is the damned Novell Certification Im studying for right now. As to the story, Im wondering - I have to work on my method of telling the war portions of the story, otherwise it'll take forever :)

Solmyr: Indeed! Ive been playing around with jobens DNA Maker because I couldnt stand Roger Borsa' old man look. Now the two brothers actually look similar too. Hurrah!
 
The End of the Zirids

The first clash of arms between the Normans and the Zirids came in the early hours of 27th February, 1073. Murtaza the Cruel had landed in Mahdia with better than three-thousand men, and had caught Bohemond de Hauteville unawares. Bohemond fielded just over half Murtaza’s men, but had the advantage of terrain behind him.

The Bishop of Reggio urged Bohemond to retreat north toward Tunis, where Bohemond’s father, Robert, had another two-thousand men. Bohemond, who had yet to face a serious foe, refused. He was eager to test himself against Murtaza, who despite his vicious reputation was a canny commander.

As the sun reached its zenith, the two forces came together and the Battle of Mahdia began. Murtaza held back a portion of his forces, so as to keep fresh units at hand for later in the day – but he was unprepared for the skilled opposition he was to face. Bohemond personally led his troops, throwing himself into the thick of battle irregardless of personal risk. Time and again, his example steadied men on the urge of breaking, and for a time it seemed as if the Berber’s would break before the Normans.

But eventually Murtaza’s numerical advantage became overwhelming. His fresh units began to push back the weary Norman’s, until Bohemond was forced to concede defeat. Personally leading a furious rear-guard action, the Normans were able to escape the battlefield, retreating deeper into the province.

Despite the loss, Bohemond’s reputation was made. His brave and valorous example had won the loyalty of his men, and the respect of his foes. The Zirid soldiers called him ‘the Young Lion’, and even Murtaza was forced to give respect to this fifteen year old who fought with a skill beyond his years.

Having forced Bohemond to retreat, Murtaza decided to head north and engage Bohemond’s father rather than invest Mahdia itself, or chase Bohemond down and eliminate his troops. It was to prove a costly mistake however. The day after his troops had marched north, Bohemond loaded his troops aboard the Norman fleet and sailed east – to Messina.

In the north, Robert had reached Bizerte, and lain siege to the city. Runners had swiftly reached him with news of Bohemond’s defeat, and he knew that Murtaza would now seek a battle with him. It would prove difficult to maintain the siege whilst fending off Murtaza, but he was confident of victory. He was easily Murtaza’s superior in strategy, and with his brother Roger there as well his position was all but unassailable.

His confidence was well-founded as his troops managed to withstand two assaults as Murtaza, increasingly desperate, sought to dislodge the Normans. It was to no avail, and after a furious battle in August of 1073 that saw Murtaza flee with barely a thousand men the city was finally captured. The lands of the Berber’s were now fully under Norman control.

ASM-Map-1074-Tunisia.gif

Norman Tunisia, 1074

ASM-Legend-Cyrenica.gif
Emirate of Cyrenica
ASM-Legend-Tunisia.gif
Kingdom of Tunisia
ASM-Legend-Apulia.gif
Duchy of Apulia & Calabria


Leaving Roger in charge of his forces, Robert took a fast ship to join Bohemond in Messina, personally taking charge of the siege. The city fell a month later, and Robert reclaimed Messina as his own.

In the west, Murtaza had been forced to sail to Trapani, where he hoped to rouse his Sicilian vassals against the Normans. Terrified of the Guiscard’s bloody retribution, and of the Young Lions skill, the Emirs refused to aid Murtaza futher. They demanded he surrender to the Normans, and accept his defeat. Enraged, Murtaza had the Emir of Trapani ritually strangled, and he claimed the lands of Trapani as his own. In light of this, his Sicilian vassals deserted him, justly fearing for their lives. Murtaza now stood alone as the Normans approached Trapani.

The Normans arrived in February of 1074, and swiftly demanded Murtaza’s surrender. They were content to leave him with Trapani, if he would accept the loss of Messina as well as the Zirid’s lands in Tunisia. Murtaza refused. There can be no doubt that he knew he was defeated – he had barely defeated the Young Lion when he had a decisive numerical advantage. Now the numerical advantage was held by the Normans, and he faced not just Bohemond, but Robert himself. But still he refused.

With the refusal of their peace terms, the Normans laid siege to the city. With better than two-thousand men, facing a foe with little better than seven hundred troops, the city was sure to fall swiftly. Seeing defeat was imminent, Murtaza gathered his men and led a charge to break through the Normans.

Of the seven hundred men who rode out of Trapani, scarcely a hundred would survive the day. Murtaza himself was hacked down, having repeatedly refused calls to yield. Perhaps he was determined to die, rather than suffer the ignominy of defeat. The end result was the same – the Kingdom of the Zirids was no more.

With the loss of the Zirid kingdom, the Moslem populace of Sicily was bereft of protection. For a time, Mustafa al-Ibrahim, the Emir of Sicily, attempted to weld the other lords into a new kingdom, but the remaining Emirs fell to squabbling amongst themselves, and nothing was done.

It was to prove a monumental mistake, as now Sicily lay open to the Normans. Within a decade, Sicily would become a Norman Duchy.

ASM-Map-1074-Sicily.gif

The Emirates of Sicily, 1074

ASM-Legend-Apulia.gif
Duchy of Apulia & Calabria
ASM-Legend-Sicily.gif
Emirate of Sicily
ASM-Legend-Malta.gif
Emirate of Malta
ASM-Legend-Siracusa.gif
Emirate of Siracusa
 
Last edited:
Excellent news. Good luck with the certification.
 
Too cool for school. Don't gobble up those last muslims too soon though, wait until the Crusades start so you get some piety too.

Unless, of course, it looks like someone else is going to grab them.

Bohemund is quite a leader, too bad he's 'illegitimate'. He's earned a Duchy title though (once you get a crown for yourself, of course).