• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
FAL said:
That was an old idea of mine that worked too.

Well, I would like to hear the opinion of more people first then. I am still busy with the scenario anyway :)

If we go with a classique country distribution, I gladly accept Johns order to do it.
John, give me Ottoman Empire!!!!

Awesome.

First order of business! I will take Sweden!... j/k, but not really ;) (but seriously, I would never use such power to my own benefit*very serious expression*).


I would appreciate it if everyone PM'd their preferences to me, to make it easier to sort out, should we decide on a classique distribution.
 
FAL said:
For example: BOTH Aladar and Wonko seem to want England BADLY. So if I am just going to pick a country for one of them, I at least have one annoyed player.

Just kick those who whines about setup and country. They tend to quit anyway sooner or later.

FAL said:
Also: I get accused a LOT that a player setup I created, was made to favour my own position in the game.

Ban them too :)
Your only mistake was rookie Austria at Gotterducking, but i think reasonable people understood it was mistake and not intention.

FAL said:
But fine, if there are more people against the bidding, I will scrap it and try to make a traditional setup based on preferences.
But then I demand everyone lists 3 countries and no less. Too much requests like 'I want only to play X'.

i suppose KJ got a point too. Too much chances to get weird setup, where someone can bid unresponsible enough and mess up the country more after that. So good setup from GM is welcome..

If someone will complain, tell them i`ll ban their IP from stats and they won`t get random leaders :p

Please clarify, we`ll get playing Bavaria, Palatinat, Austria, Brandenburg, Poland ?
 
besides FAL, clarify about addional random leaders for certain countries.

It is same thing as scenario, only after that most players preferences (top3) are possible.

You need to tell country and years for plus random leaders.
Then you need to choose method of generating:
1. Generating all them before the first session.
2. Generating when the time comes (like NL in 1700).
Personally i prefer 1.

Then you need to choose stats of generation.
My propose is Linear system for everything:
Movement 1-6, 3.5
Fire 1-6, 3.5
Shock 1-6, 3.5
Siege 0-3, 1.2
Life period - 10-60, 25
Max difference between maneuver, fire and shock - 4
Max difference between fire and shock - 3
 
FAL said:
Because I truly, truly am tired of the mass whining of players not liking the country of their choice OR whining because they want a specific country.
For example: BOTH Aladar and Wonko seem to want England BADLY. So if I am just going to pick a country for one of them, I at least have one annoyed player.

Actualy, FAL, I've been very happy with your rosterchoices in the past and while I do want England badly, hihi, I am confident that we can find a solution here. :) I have likewise explored alternative choices already and contacted Aladar. I won't be annoyed anyway except if you put me in Oman. :p
 
Nagel said:
Unfortunately the time setup means I can't promise to be present as a perm all the time FAL. Bah :( . And knowing myself, I prefer a reliable sub then an unreliable perm in a MP game :( .

Hmm. Nagel, if it would help I would be willing to create a Tag-Team with you. How about it? You'd have one hell of an evil guy to do all the controversial stuff while you would be the shining angel & PR Dude. :D

Anyway....I'm in if you want. :)
 
Ok, we drop the whole bidding thing then :)

Tonioz said:
Please clarify, we`ll get playing Bavaria, Palatinat, Austria, Brandenburg, Poland ?

If enough turn up we will get all those nations + Genoa.

John will distribute nations, he knows the strength and weaknesses of everyone here well enough too to do that. PM him 3-4 nations you want to play.

John, can you present me the setup no later than next week thursday?

These countries are up for playing.

  1. Austria
  2. Bavaria
  3. Brandenburg
  4. Denmark
  5. England
  6. France
  7. Genoa
  8. Ottoman Empire
  9. Palatinat
  10. Poland
  11. Portugal
  12. Russia
  13. Venice
  14. Spain
  15. Sweden

Player list
  1. FAL
  2. Miozozny
  3. Tonioz
  4. El Greco
  5. smn
  6. Sterkarm
  7. Seen
  8. Wonko (+Nagel?)
  9. Aladar
  10. Robertus
  11. King John
  12. EarendilHE
  13. Daniel A.
  14. Rezag
  15. Drake
  16. PJL

Miozozny plays the Netherlands.

Genoa+Bavaria+Palatinat will get a starting CC that will be removed if they get annexed.
 
Rokka said:
Still tho, Id like to play in another game and decided to try my luck that if the starting time isnt set in stone, and there is more room, Id like to join. :)

Well, we already have 16 players :)

But if the game proceeds some will have quit and your own game might have ended, so please contact me then and you could take over a country.
 
Sure Fal



Everyone, remember to PM your preferences to me.
 
Tonio: stats would be:

Movement 1-6, 4
Fire 1-6, 3.5
Shock 1-6, 3.5
Siege 0-3, 1.2
Life period - 10-50, 25
Max difference between maneuver, fire and shock - 3
Max difference between fire and shock - 2

average: 4 leaders for each 100 years.
Bavaria, Palatinat, Pfalz 3 generals, 1 admiral averga per 100 years.
NL and POR should have 3 admirals, 1 general average per 100 years.
Others 2 generals, 2 admirals.
 
Last edited:
damn, didn`t reduce number of leaders for Portugal
gonna regenerate them
 
Last edited:
FAL said:
Extra leaders for:

Bavaria, Palatinat, Genoa, Venice, Brandenburg : WHOLE GAME
Portugal: After 1600
Spain: After 1650
Poland, Denmark, Netherlands: After 1700

Getting confused, i didn`t notice Brandenburg first ?!?!
Shouldn`t it be like pre-1600 times ?
 
hmm,generation 6 is corrupted - no generals were done for Denmark
that must be linked with "general"->"monarch" thingie
 
Save with 4 generations uploaded to stats.