I've only recently started using Antagonize but it seems pretty useful. If you have high intrigue you can get a claim for 500 Gold when you are feudal. I don't know if it's cheaper when you are tribal,
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I mainly use it to deliberately create rivals (for duels), or to add a tiny push to plots/invites (the negative general/vassal opinion modifiers can be just enough to make someone accept an "invite to court/plot" offer).
My main annoyance is that stopping antagonising (and swaying) removes the person from the list in the outliner, even if they were starred before you started. I tend to use the outliner list as a kind of long-term to-do list, so it's rather annoying if someone disappears from the list before they're "done".
My main annoyance is that stopping antagonising (and swaying) removes the person from the list in the outliner, even if they were starred before you started. I tend to use the outliner list as a kind of long-term to-do list, so it's rather annoying if someone disappears from the list before they're "done".
No, antagonizing someone does not supply Tribals (of count and count+ tier) with claims at all. Nor seems to affect Fabricate Claim by any means.
Yes, it allows Tribals to claim-duel someone on few very rare occasions where without antagonizing you can't claim-duel the target at all (or so it feels).
And yes, the target still can reject the duel at a cost of Prestige hit.
Yes, it allows Tribals to claim-duel someone on few very rare occasions where without antagonizing you can't claim-duel the target at all (or so it feels).
And yes, the target still can reject the duel at a cost of Prestige hit.