• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

Nikolai II

A bunny with a hat
131 Badges
Nov 18, 2001
9.784
2.284
www.giantitp.com
  • Hearts of Iron II: Beta
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Age of Wonders II
  • 200k Club
  • 500k Club
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • BATTLETECH - Backer
  • War of the Roses
  • Lead and Gold
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Magicka
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Imperator: Rome
  • Penumbra - Black Plague
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • For The Glory
  • Shadowrun: Hong Kong
Starting Napoleons Ambition displayed 'The HRE has elected Austria of Austria as emperor', so there might be a %n error of some sort?

Might be a scenario error too, since there probably was an emperor already elected in 1795?
 
Upvote 0
The only scenarios with pre-defined Emperors are 1419 and 1700; the others have to work it all out for themselves.

The relevant code in text.csv appears to be:
Code:
EMPEROR_SETUP;When a new emperor has been elected;;;;;;;;;;5623
EMPEROR_HEADER;Our Governor reports%s;;;;;;;;;;5624
EMPEROR_1;New Emperor elected;;;;;;;;;;5625
EMPEROR_2;%t, the electorates of the Holy Roman Empire have elected;;;;;;;;;;5626
EMPEROR_3;%s;;;;;;;;;;5627
EMPEROR_4;of;;;;;;;;;;5628
EMPEROR_5;%s;;;;;;;;;;5629
EMPEROR_6;as emperor.;;;;;;;;;;5630

EMPEROR_LOG;The Holy Roman Empire has elected %s of %s as emperor..;;;;;;;;;;5631
EMPEROR_BTN1;OK;;;;;;;;;;5632
EMPEROR_BTN2;Goto;;;;;;;;;;5633

So my guess is the first set of lines are used in a normal election, and work because the two "%s" variables are on different lines. The second set are perhaps used when there is no Emperor and as there is "%s" twice in one line obviously the same value appears in both.

Unless less someone here knows a lot more about these variables than me we'll probably need to go to the code to work out what it should be. Meanwhile a pretty good fix would be to define the Emperor at the start of each other scenario; if anyone wants to research that be my guest!
 
1492: Frederick III of Austria
1617: Matthias of Austria
1773: Francis I of Lorraine
1792: Francis II of Tuscany

Hope this helps. :)
 
It does, assuming it's the same HRE in 1795 as 1792. Thanks!