Is it just me or are aristocrats hardly worth the effort to maintain within the borders of your nation?
I know they give a pop-sized production bonus on certain RGO's (fish, grain, cattle and something else), but I don't find this bonus significant enough to keep them around. As far as I am aware, all rich POPs gain their income according to the following formula;
base_income = 4.0 * poor_base_income * ( pop_size / 100,000 )
and
income = base_income + export_income
So is the assumption true that if your nation has a large population of aristocrats that it influences (slows down the rate) the income accumulation of your capitalists? It seems that if I play a European nation without aristocrats (Germany, France, Russia and Austria are the only ones I tried this with) and a healthy amount of capitalist, my economy seems to develop at a faster rate than usual. Also, the early game cash gain of taxing them to death is quite nice.
I know they give a pop-sized production bonus on certain RGO's (fish, grain, cattle and something else), but I don't find this bonus significant enough to keep them around. As far as I am aware, all rich POPs gain their income according to the following formula;
base_income = 4.0 * poor_base_income * ( pop_size / 100,000 )
and
income = base_income + export_income
So is the assumption true that if your nation has a large population of aristocrats that it influences (slows down the rate) the income accumulation of your capitalists? It seems that if I play a European nation without aristocrats (Germany, France, Russia and Austria are the only ones I tried this with) and a healthy amount of capitalist, my economy seems to develop at a faster rate than usual. Also, the early game cash gain of taxing them to death is quite nice.
Last edited: