I'm wondering how people generally organize their armies. It seems that anything over 5 units in a flank (not incl reserves) gives you a frontage penalty. As a result even in my biggest armies I generally try to keep just 5 units per flank with the rest of the forces in reserve. While this does seem to be effective in battles, keeping this formation at its most effective can be a lot of work, especially in MP where pausing isn't an option. Basically after heavy battles the front line units in the flank naturally soak up a lot of casualities. This then means that I need to spend time reorganizing, manually pulling fresh brigades from the reserves to strengthen the battered flanks. I also greatly dislike doomstacks - thus I keep my armies in Corps of between 20-40k, with the occasional strong force of 50-70k. Rarely if ever do I go over 70k in a single stack unless generals are in particularly short supply in comparison to my available manpower. This results in a great deal of army management as I find myself going through all my corps after battles/campaigns sending depleted units to the reserves and replacing them with relatively fresh brigades.
What I'm wondering is, am I causing myself an unneccesary amount of work, or is it really worth it to keep on top of things like this? And is it really a good idea to have just 5 units per flank? Those brigades take so much damage, assigning more units to each flank may give a frontage penalty, but seems to have the advantage of spreading the damage over a wider range, thus maintaining the combat efficiency of each individual brigade. I also often find after heavy battles/campaigns that many of my front line units have taken severe damage and no longer count when working out which tactics can be used or not - thus sometimes the tactic I've chosen is disabled due to too much damage on one or more units. On SP its not such a problem, but on MP where pausing isn't viable and you're stuck in a gruelling war with plenty of battles and maneuvering it saps precious micro time and can be downright dangerous at times to concentrate on reorganization as you can't see whats going on!
So, is it a good or bad idea to keep ~5 units per flank? Has anyone done any extensive testing with different setups? What are your thoughts on combat efficiency over micro management (Particularly in regard to MP)?
What I'm wondering is, am I causing myself an unneccesary amount of work, or is it really worth it to keep on top of things like this? And is it really a good idea to have just 5 units per flank? Those brigades take so much damage, assigning more units to each flank may give a frontage penalty, but seems to have the advantage of spreading the damage over a wider range, thus maintaining the combat efficiency of each individual brigade. I also often find after heavy battles/campaigns that many of my front line units have taken severe damage and no longer count when working out which tactics can be used or not - thus sometimes the tactic I've chosen is disabled due to too much damage on one or more units. On SP its not such a problem, but on MP where pausing isn't viable and you're stuck in a gruelling war with plenty of battles and maneuvering it saps precious micro time and can be downright dangerous at times to concentrate on reorganization as you can't see whats going on!
So, is it a good or bad idea to keep ~5 units per flank? Has anyone done any extensive testing with different setups? What are your thoughts on combat efficiency over micro management (Particularly in regard to MP)?