Originally posted by Txini
Or your Heirless Brother, giving you his throne![]()
Again, though, in most instances where a brother or son felt strongly enough that he should rule instead of you, it meant war, not assassination.
Even in questionable cases like the death of William II Rufus, nothing is proven. Assuming it wasnt an accident and that Henry I had paid for it, it still doesnt fit here. Like Beckett's death, it was a murder by a non-assassin "unit". Thats why it might work as a game option in certain cases (I pay a corrupt knight to kill a king the people, barons, Pope, and other kings hate anyway and with good reason), but not as a "I build an assassin unit this round and try to kill my brother with it the next."