• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The starting transport technology has a maximum of 10 transports per invasion (separate locations included). So, my understanding is that with the default four battalions and no support, you can invade with 5 divisions. Since 5 battalions is already 2.5 weight, if you add anything, be it another battalion or just ENG, you're down to 4 divisions. IMO it's worth it to drop down to 4 to get some support. Still another option is dropping down to 3 divisions of 3.33 weight. The mind reels.

A little correction: the limit is actually number of divisions and the weight of divisions does NOT matter. So if your limit is 50 you can add 50 divisions, no matter if its 4 battalion marines or 10 battalion armour. Of course you still need to have required number of transports, so more weight=more transports needed.
 
They get large attack bonuses in marshes, on rivers,
Useful post. I'm considering swapping a single battalion in infantry division from INF to MAR for the river attack bonus. But not sure about trading DEF & HP vs ORG. anyone have tried (or theorised) about this?
 
Don't forget the bonus is 'avaraged out' so with a 10 battalion division you end up with a 3.5% bonus. What i am wondering is how a 5 marines + 5 mounties division would do, yeah some lower hp but an almost 20% attack boost in all 'difficult' terrain situations where you mostly end up fighting anyway.
 
Useful post. I'm considering swapping a single battalion in infantry division from INF to MAR for the river attack bonus. But not sure about trading DEF & HP vs ORG. anyone have tried (or theorised) about this?

I've considered a 7x INF, 1x MAR, 1x SP-ART (19 combat width I know) just because in this case the 1x MAR perfectly cancels out the -4% attack on river crossings from the SP-ART. I haven't actually done it because it's pretty insignificant and the benefit doesn't outweigh the downsides. However, there might be some configuration that would be better. Maybe using ARM instead to get that even 20.
 
A little correction: the limit is actually number of divisions and the weight of divisions does NOT matter. So if your limit is 50 you can add 50 divisions, no matter if its 4 battalion marines or 10 battalion armour. Of course you still need to have required number of transports, so more weight=more transports needed.

Thanks. That's a big difference! I'll go work on editing my post on marines.
 
Yeah that is why I have used 10 divisions of 10 Marines each early on. Gave me a lot of men to throw at the beaches within the cap. They had engineers and artillery for support early on and later I added field hospitals and anti-tank support. I suppose I could give them one division of armor instead of Marines for more breakthrough but they did fine as is.
 
Thanks for the guide, a few questions:

1) What is "IC cost"? You mention it several times (e.g., "low SA per IC cost"), but it isn't in your list of abbreviations and I can't think of what it is :).
It doesn't seem to be any resource (at least, I don't see any with the initials 'ic'), and it isn't manpower... help?
EDIT: After much googling I found a terminology guide for HOI3 and it explained that IC is Industrial Capacity.
I think you should definitely put this in your abbreviations though.

2) You may want to add ORG to your abbreviation list. I know what it is (organization), but some others might not.

3) Same with MP (e.g., you say "MP losses") -- some might not know this is manpower.

4) Division design notes #5: You say 'ARM' but I think you mean 'ART' in the last sentence.

5) Sample divisions--Armored Spearhead, you reference 'ARM'--do you mean any of the LARM, MARM, or HARM?
Same question for Assault Gun & Mixed Armor divisions.


Thanks!
 
  • 1
Reactions:
One thing i think is important is to make sure you have a basic infantry template. As Italy, I'm kicking myself because I upgraded my infantry a lot amd now my home defence have super high support brigades.

If you forsee having different types, build a "base template" and then duplicate from there.

Yeah, I ran into this problem too.

As Italy, I accidentally upgraded my entire Infantry force to LARM Divisions with MOTs.

That left we with a hand full of Mountaineers and Marines as my infantry force for a while.
 
Last edited:
I am late, so I'll keep this short: Here is a brief guide where I try to explain all units and what they are useful for.
[SPOILERS]
Abbreviations:
DEF - Defence - Used to deflect attacks when defending.
BRK - Breakthrough - Used to deflect attacks when attacking.
SA - Soft Attack - Used to attack soft targets.
HA - Hard Attack - Used to attack hard targets.
HARD - Hardness - Used to define how many % of the SA and HA of an enemy will actually be used against this division.
ARM - Armor - Average thickness of the armor for the division. If enemy can't pierce you deal extra damage and take less.
PIER - Pierce - Used to penetrate Armor, if you can't pierce your enemy, he will suffer less damage and he will deal more
SPD - Speed - Determines how fast the unit can move. High Speed gives a bonus to reinforce chance in combat.
MP - Manpower - How many men you need.
SUP - Supression - Used to keep partisan resistance in check.
REC - Recon - Used to determine which side has the initative, which gives a better chance to pick a good tactic.

- - - - - - - - -

Infantry (INF) - Your basic combat unit. High DEF, but low stats otherwise - Use as main body for your army.

Mountaineer (MTN) - Slightly better BRK than INF, but also much more costly - Use these for mountain warfare.

Paratroopers (PAR) - Weak stats and limited in terms of design options - Use them to snatch provinces to delay an enemy or cut him off.

Artillery (ART) - Very high SA, decent BRK, excellent firepower per frontage - Use them to increase your division's SA and offensive capacity.

Anti-Tank (AT) - High HA and PRC - Use them to counter enemy tank divisions.

Anti-Air (AA) - High Air Attack, decent HA, minor PRC - Use them to shoot down enemy air units that attack in combat and get a bit of extra HA against enemy tanks, particularly LARM.

Rocket Artillery (R-ART) - High SA, decent BRK, excellent firepower per frontage. Almost the same as ART, but slightly better at offense - Use them to increase your division's SA and offensive capacity.

Cavalry (CAV) - Good SPD, high SUP, subpar stats - Weak and more costly version of INF that's faster and better at garrision duty - Use them to supress partisans.

Motorized (MOT) - High SPD- Faster version of INF - Use them to provide ORG for your tanks or for fast encirclement moves.

Mechanized (MECH) - High Hardness, good stats, high HA. Much stronger stats than MOT, but also way more costly and much slower - Use them to provide ORG for your MARM and HARM or to create semi-armored attack divisions.

Light Armor (LARM) - High SPD, high hardness, good BRK, low DEF, ARM, HA and PIER. Very low ORG. Weak against enemy armor - Use them for fast exploit divisions, to add BRK and a bit of ARM to your combat units or as breakthrough units against inferiour enemies.

Medium Armor (MARM) - Good SPD, High hardness, good ARM and PIER, balanced DEF/BRK and SA/HA, but low SA per IC cost. Very low ORG - Use them as Breakthrough units and to counter other LARM and MARM.

Heavy Armor (HARM) - Very high hardness, ARM, PIER and HA. Low SA per IC cost. Rather low SPD. Very low ORG - Use these to counter enemy tanks if you have too much IC for some reason.

Super Heavy Armor (SHARM) - Extreme Hardness, ARM, PIER and HA. Low SPD. Very low ORG. Insane IC cost - Use these if you are a maniac for whom HARM wouldn't drain enough ressources.

Self Propelled Artillery (SP-ART) - Extreme SA, terrible HA, bad BRK, okay DEF, lower hardness, ARM and PIER. Trade stats for SA. Excellent firepower per frontage - Use these to give your tank divisions a big boost against soft targets.

Tank Destroyer (TD) - Good HA and PIER, terrible SA, bad BRK, okay DEF. Trade stats for HA and PIER. Rather low HA difference to regular armor - Use these to counter enemy tanks of a higher class (LARM -> MARM, MARM -> HARM) or better tech level.

Self Propelled Anti-Air (SP-AA) - Mediocre AA. Bad DEF, BRK, ARM, HARD, SA, HA. Trades stats for AA - Don't use them - they are terrible.

Self Propelled Rocket Artillery (SP-R-ART) - High SPD and SA, decent BRK, excellent firepower per frontage. Lower ARM and HARD than SPART, but slightly cheaper - Use them as a lot-tech replacement for SP-ART.

Engineer (ENG) - Better dig-in, better SPD and defence for some terrain, better attack for invasions. Later models increase dig-in significantly and give minor benefits for fort, river and urban combat - Use these to make your units significantly stronger at defence, particularly when defending a river.

Recon (REC) - Better SPD in difficult terrain. Provides REC. Later models provide more REC - Use them to make your units a bit faster and pick better tactics slightly more often. Seems more important when your leaders are inferior (or just on par) to the enemy.

Military Policy (MP) - Improves SUP. Later models improve SUP bonus - Use these to supress partisans more efficiently.

Maintenance (MAIN) - Improved Reliability. Reduces equipment losses (including attrition and training). Later models increase reliability - Use these with your most costly divisions to reduce equipment losses.

Field Hospital (HOS) - Grants trickleback (returns some MP losses to your pool) and lower XP loss from combat losses. Later models improve trickleback and XP loss reduction - Use these to preserve precious manpower and boost XP gain from combat.

Logistics (LOG) - Reduces Supply Usage - Later models reduce usage further - Use these to reduce your supply weight and field more units inside a supply region.

Signal (SIG) - Increases Iniative, which givs a better chance to reinforce in comabt and improves planning speed. Later models gran more iniative - Use these to speed up your Battle Plans and to reinforce faster in combat.

- - - - - - - - -
[/SPOILERS]

Division Design Notes:

(1) Always aim for a width of 5, 10 or 20. The regular frontage in combat is 80 + 40 per extra attack vector (from a different province). Exceeding frontge gives you signfiicant combat penalties. Design with width 11 or 22 if you plan to attach the unit to a leader with Offensive trait (-10% unit frontage).

(2) Support brigades don't increase frontage, so it's a good idea to add ART (and maybe AT, AA) to all your designs. They don't affect speed or hardness of a divsion, but do lower ARM and PIER.

(3) This means that a base design with 10/11 width has higher firepower per frontage than 20/22 (because you can squeeze in more support ART), but it also costs more equipment and Land XP to design (since most nations start with 8+ INF in their main template).

(4) Do not use pure Armor divisions. Armor has extremely low ORG and should be teamed up with MOT or MECH. Even when using the Blitzkrieg Doctrine Tree a pure Armor division will be barely more than a breakthrough unit that can't sustain combat for more than a few days.

(5) SP-ART has, by far, the highest SA per frontage (followed by ART). It also needs far less equipment per brigade, so you actually pay ~30 less for it than for a regular ARM brigade, even if production cost per unit are the same.

(6) Related to that: Support ART, AT, AA and R-ART need less equipment than Frontline variants (but also provide less stats). LARM, MARM and HARM also have different equipment numbers (60, 50, 40), so while '41 costs are 10/13/27 IC less per equipment, the total IC cost per brigade is 60 * 10 = 600 vs. 50 * 13 = 650 vs 27 * 40 = 1080.

(7) Remember you can use the DUPLICATE function to create new templates. Since every change to a template costs 5 XP per unit removed, exchanged or added (10 for support brigades), the duplicate function can save you a lot of Land XP. For example, if you want to have both LARM and MARM divisions with a few extra MOT, first finish your LARM template, then duplicate it and replace all LARM with MARM. That way you don't have to add the MOT units to both templates.

(8) Any unit can capture territory, regardless of size. So if you want you can build single brigade MOT divisions to swarm out and capture territory. Just pray you aren't stopped by a "real" division.

(9) ORG, ARM and PIER are calculated as an average (with some additional weights in it) of all your existing brigades. This means that adding a low ORG unit will lower your division's ORG, while adding a high ORG unit will slightly improve it (same for ARM / PIER).

(10) ENG combines extremely well with a Defensive trait leader (+30% digin), even more so when the country also has Grand Battleplan (+10 dig-in) or Mass Assault Doctrine (+5 dig-in). France in particular can pull off some amazing dig-in values if they manage to grab the '39 model before the outbreak of the war - I have seen values up to 59% (just don't ask me HOW it is calculated).

(11) When more comes to mind (or if there are some good questions in this thread), I'll add it here.

- - - - - - - - -

Example Division Designs:
(Keep in mind these are just SUGGESTIONS to demonstrate how the system works, not necesarily the BEST DESIGNS). Support brigads are listed in [brackets].

Basic Main Combat Infantry:
10xINF [+ ART/ENG] (20 width)
Cheap and affordable, but not much else. Good on defence. Useful for poor minors.

Intermediate Main Combat Infantry:
7xINF + 2xART [+ ART/AT/EN] (20 width)
Same as above, but much better when attacking. Good for minors.

Deluxe Main Combat Infantry Division:
7xINF + 2xART [+ ART/AT/AA/ENG/LOG] (20 width)
Good all-around division that can fend off tanks on it's own and even inflict minor losses to air units. LOG means you can squeeze in more divisions per Supply Region (great for GER / SOV / USA), ENG gives a good advantage when defending. Good for majors.

XL Deluxe Main Combat Infantry Division:
8xINF + 2xART [+ ART/AT/AA/ENG/LOG] (22 width)
Same as above, just with an extra INF to get to 22 frontage. Good for majors with an Offensive leader.

Mass Assault Division:
10xINF + 2xART [+ART/AT/R-ART/ENG/LOG]
Adjusted template that adds a few extra INF divisions to make use of the -0.4 frontage reduction from the Mass Assault Doctrine tree.

Artillery Division:
4xINF + 4xART [+ ART/R-ART/LOG] (20 width)
Has lower ORG than regular Infantry, but more firepower per frontage. Good for breakthroughs.

Anti-Tank Division:
4xINF + 2xAT [+ AT/ENG] (10 width)
Great balance between SA, HA and cost. Keep them in reserve and use them in large stacks (8+) to halt enemy armored spearheads.

Anti-Air Division:
2xINF + 6xAA [+ AA/ENG] (10 width)
Low ORG, but high AA. Keep them as a reserve in the rear and strat redeploy them into important battles where the enemy airforce is harassing you.

Armored Spearhead:
2xSP-ART + 3xARM + 4xMOT [+ ART/AT/MAIN/LOG] (20 width)
Has great SA, good HA and decent ORG. A good spearhead and breakthrough division that can hold against counter-attacks.

Assault Gun Division:
4xSP-ART + 2xARM + 2xMOT [+ART] (20 width)
Incredible SA that rips through enemy Infantry, with (barely) acceptable ORG value.

Mixed Armor Division:
2xSP-ART + 3xARM + 1xTD + 3xMECH (20 width)
Mixed armor division that can deal with any situation.

Motorized Division:
7xMOT + 2xSP-ART [+ART/REC/ENG]
A fast division with decent speed modifiers. Even rivers won't stop these guys.

Security Division:
5xCAV [+MP]
Partisan supression unit

Garrison Division:
4xINF + 2xAA [+ENG/AA]
A defensive unit designed for island garrison duty where enemy air power is more threatening than tanks.

What are your thoughts on mixing Armor (LARM/MARM/HARM) into Infantry Divisions?

Why did you suggest adding AT support companies to Armored Divisions and not to MOT Divisions?

Since Recon give attack bonuses over terrain, wouldn't a good Division be:

8xMARINE + 1xLARM + SP-ART [ENG/REC/AT/SIG/LOG] ?
 
I feel like AA Support is not really necessary at all. As most major powers, you should be able to stockpile enough fighters to maintain at least a semblance of parity in the air war. The ORG hit just doesn't feel worth it to me. I found that 7x infantry with 2x Artillery is amazingly effective. Using that against the Russians as Germany, my infantry were able to win almost every attack they launched.

The armor and mech divisions you provided are good. I'm going to try them out playing as fascist America invading Mexico. Screw Trump's wall, I'll just annex the damn country.
 
I feel like AA Support is not really necessary at all. As most major powers, you should be able to stockpile enough fighters to maintain at least a semblance of parity in the air war. The ORG hit just doesn't feel worth it to me. I found that 7x infantry with 2x Artillery is amazingly effective. Using that against the Russians as Germany, my infantry were able to win almost every attack they launched.

The armor and mech divisions you provided are good. I'm going to try them out playing as fascist America invading Mexico. Screw Trump's wall, I'll just annex the damn country.

What support companies did you use on your Infantry/Artillery Division?
 
What are your thoughts on mixing Armor (LARM/MARM/HARM) into Infantry Divisions?

Why did you suggest adding AT support companies to Armored Divisions and not to MOT Divisions?

Since Recon give attack bonuses over terrain, wouldn't a good Division be:

8xMARINE + 1xLARM + SP-ART [ENG/REC/AT/SIG/LOG] ?
(1) I don't think mixing INF and ARM is a good idea. LARM's biggest advantage is speed, so they work best with MOT. You pay a premium price to get that armor/hardness on MARM/HARM and it gets watered down almost completely by the INF. I'd rather build proper armor divisions that might end up unpierced by enemy INF divisions with only support AT.
If you really want to mix INF and ARM, I'd suggest to use (medium or heavy) TDs - lots of armor/HA/pierce and much lower cost than regular ARM bridages.

(2) The MOT divisions were meant for the exploit after a breakthrough, so the idea is that you shouldn't face serious opposition anymore. If you have the IC, it's not a bad idea to add AT.

(3) REC grants a movement bonus, not a combat bonus.

I feel like AA Support is not really necessary at all. As most major powers, you should be able to stockpile enough fighters to maintain at least a semblance of parity in the air war. [...]
AA is actually rather weak against enemy air units (only seems to take out CAS reliably) and, true, as a major nation FGT are usually a more versatile option. But minors are certainly better off with AA and AAA - and it is a versatile hybrid support unit because it provides some extra HA and pierce. Since you can only use one support AT per division, getting a bit of extra HA/pierce without frontage can be great to counter enemy MARM divisions (particularly once variants with armor bonuses are used). I have yet to test, however, if dedicated AA divisions (e.g. 2xINF + 6xAA) are a good counter to bombers.
 
What can you guys recommend for ART doctrine? Using very greedy 15 Inf + 10 Art + full 5 sups. I destroy everything without a chance, but its obviously not very efficient. What kind of divisions better?
 
Superior Firepower benefits from small templates with a higher % of ART, so something like:
2xINF + 2xART (10 width) or 4xINF + 4xART (20 width) works pretty well if (you have the IC for it).
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I'd got with [ART/AT/R-ART/ENG/LOG], but keep an eye on your max ORG (I haven't played Superior Firepower in quite a while).
 
  • 1
Reactions:
I'd got with [ART/AT/R-ART/ENG/LOG], but keep an eye on your max ORG (I haven't played Superior Firepower in quite a while).

As Italy, I just redesigned all my templates according to your guidance.

I had some pretty badly designed templates.

That said, I still like maxing the support companies.

For instance:
AT/ART/ENG/MED/LOG

On armoured and mechanized units, I go with;

AT/ENG/MAINT/MED/LOG

I switch things up a bit depending on other factors, adding ART or forgoing Hospitals (MED), depending.

I also try to avoid using non scaling support with larger 40 weight units while using a mix of scaling and non scaling with 20 weight units.

With 10 weight divisions I only use ENG and non scaling support, so ENG/AT/ART/AA, etc.

Are there any major downsides to these types of 5-support designs?

What support units should I avoid using?

What support is useful with which unit types, missions, and compositions?
 
I'd got with [ART/AT/R-ART/ENG/LOG], but keep an eye on your max ORG (I haven't played Superior Firepower in quite a while).
That's what I ended up with, except maybe swapping at for recon as I virtually never come across enemy armour.