Bohemia has a strange role in Abe: it starts off as a strong country, but is destined for destruction very early on with the Hussite events. The story goes something like this, by the looks of it:
1. The Hussites reject Sigmund of Luxembourg and take over the country.
2. Bavaria, Poland and Hungary crusade to crush the heretics, and in Hungary's case also because Sigmund considers himself king.
So far, so good. But here are some of the thing I can't get my head round:
3. Bavaria and Poland get cores on the periphery of Bohemia as part of a 'crusade' to defeat the Hussites. This means if they snatch a couple of provinces but don't force Bohemia back to Catholicism, they lose their CB. Even sillier, the cores stay even if Bohemia goes back to Catholic. So Bavaria and Poland get to keep 'crusading' cores against a Catholic Bohemia.
4. As a result of the events, Hungary gets a core on Styria. What have the Styrians got to do with it?
5. Despite Hungary horribly crushing Bohemia, the default is for Bavaria and Hungary to share out the cores. So Sigmund goes from being King of Bohemia to saying 'actually, I'll give half the country to Bavaria'.
6. Bavaria can go further and claim the whole country, something which is not endorsed by Hungary. On what basis? Do the Wittelsbachs reckon that the Luxembourg claim is dodgy, and if so, why do they have a better one? Is the rest of the world really going to calmly accept an announcement that Bohemia is now Wittelsbach turf?
Unless I'm just very confused, the whole epo_hus file needs major surgery. There are two approaches we can take:
A - stick to the sensible part of the storyline, but adjust the rest to fit, ie: no land-grabbing for Bavaria and Poland, a proper rapprochement after the defeat of the Hussites, and Hungary is trying to put Sigmund on the throne of an intact Bohemia, not rip it to shreds.
B - change the storyline. For example, what if Hungary didn't have any claim to the Bohemian throne? How about some other power, or even no power at all? Maybe Bohemia should be a potential major in its own right.
1. The Hussites reject Sigmund of Luxembourg and take over the country.
2. Bavaria, Poland and Hungary crusade to crush the heretics, and in Hungary's case also because Sigmund considers himself king.
So far, so good. But here are some of the thing I can't get my head round:
3. Bavaria and Poland get cores on the periphery of Bohemia as part of a 'crusade' to defeat the Hussites. This means if they snatch a couple of provinces but don't force Bohemia back to Catholicism, they lose their CB. Even sillier, the cores stay even if Bohemia goes back to Catholic. So Bavaria and Poland get to keep 'crusading' cores against a Catholic Bohemia.
4. As a result of the events, Hungary gets a core on Styria. What have the Styrians got to do with it?
5. Despite Hungary horribly crushing Bohemia, the default is for Bavaria and Hungary to share out the cores. So Sigmund goes from being King of Bohemia to saying 'actually, I'll give half the country to Bavaria'.
6. Bavaria can go further and claim the whole country, something which is not endorsed by Hungary. On what basis? Do the Wittelsbachs reckon that the Luxembourg claim is dodgy, and if so, why do they have a better one? Is the rest of the world really going to calmly accept an announcement that Bohemia is now Wittelsbach turf?
Unless I'm just very confused, the whole epo_hus file needs major surgery. There are two approaches we can take:
A - stick to the sensible part of the storyline, but adjust the rest to fit, ie: no land-grabbing for Bavaria and Poland, a proper rapprochement after the defeat of the Hussites, and Hungary is trying to put Sigmund on the throne of an intact Bohemia, not rip it to shreds.
B - change the storyline. For example, what if Hungary didn't have any claim to the Bohemian throne? How about some other power, or even no power at all? Maybe Bohemia should be a potential major in its own right.