CK II - Various broken dynasties in 936

[Lewa263]

One line summary of your issue
Various broken dynasties in 936

Game Version
3.2.1

What expansions do you have installed?
All of the above

Do you have mods enabled?
No

Please explain your issue is in as much detail as possible.
I found some dynasties that do not display correctly in the dynasty trees, and I have in each case identified why. A few of them impact inheritance in obviously unintended ways. Here's a list:

The Barzikani dynasty (1062496) has unrelated Turks and Kurds. The two Kurds are probably supposed to be father and son, but the child does not have a father in the kurdish.txt history file.

The Kalbid dynasty (12240) has a landed Bedouin ruler Al-Hasan with no father in 936 but several Berber members of the same dynasty in his court. One of the Berbers appears to be the historical Al-Hassan (his sons have the right names and he has the right death year), who should probably replace this Bedouin impostor.

Another Berber-Bedouin issue comes up with dynasty number 1062442. This same number is used twice in a row for two unrelated dynasties (one Bedouin, one Berber) in the dynasties.txt file, so one of them needs a new number.

The dynasty number 1062594 is also used twice, once for a Lombard count in 867, and once for a Persian family in 936. Again, one of these needs a new number.

The Bedouin Hizzanid dynasty (1062475) has two members (one deceased) in the dynasty tree in 936 who have no scripted relationship. I think they're intended to be father and son based on the dates.

The Lawik dynasty (1062597) has two living members in 936. One is scripted in the afghan.txt history file as the child of somebody of a different dynasty halfway across the map, one is an unrelated landed adult. I think these are also intended to be father and son.

I'll post in this thread again if I find more. These are all easy fixes to 00_dynasties.txt and some character history files (I've already fixed them all for my own little mod), so hopefully it'll get taken care of in a future patch.

Steps to reproduce the issue.


Upload Attachment

 

[Lewa263]

I found one more: The Ethiopian Fethee dynasty (1062461) has three members in 936 (two living, one deceased). None of them have scripted relationships. Based on birth and death dates, I think it should be a grandfather, mother, and son.

 

[Lewa263]

Inspired by this other bug report (https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/index.php?threads/ck-ii-3-2-1-azce-the-coa-of-house-gájka-not-displaying-properly-in-the-936-bookmark.1196010/), I looked at the Finnish region and found a couple more issues.

The Sami Gájka dynasty has a duplicate of itself. The dynasty numbers 1045004 and 1062229 are both named Gájka and have only one scripted dynasty member each. Additionally, the character Asa (261170) is a Norse Germanic woman who is incorrectly in the 1062229 Gájka dynasty instead of the af Herjadalr dynasty (1062228), even though she has male family members in the af Herjadalr dynasty.

The Finnish Korhonen dynasty (100382) is broken in a confusing way. There are two living members in 936, an uncle and nephew. Both of them have fathers from the Savolainen dynasty (100390). So that means that a Savolainen man had two sons, one in each dynasty. Then the one with the Savolainen dynasty has two sons, again of these two different dynasties. Plus, the Korhonen dynasty has a chain of previous dead members who appear completely unrelated to the two who are alive in 936. EDIT: I looked farther on in time and this just keeps happening. Although the Korhonen dynasty is normal up until 867, almost every Korhonen afterward is actually the child of a Savolainen.

The Estonian Saremaa dynasty (1062372) is also used for an apparently unrelated Lettigallian family in 936. Because the dynasty is scripted to be Estonian and Suomenusko, I think the Romuva Lettigallians deserve their own dynasty. That would fix both dynasty trees.