• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Not a bad review.

Seems to be pretty happy with the game overall while snidly commenting that it isn't a huge leap from EU2.

That makes it sound good for me since I loved EU2 and could have lived without Victoria :D
 
Duuk said:
Not a bad review.

Seems to be pretty happy with the game overall while snidly commenting that it isn't a huge leap from EU2.

That makes it sound good for me since I loved EU2 and could have lived without Victoria :D

"Progress but not revolution"

My answer: If it's not broken, don't fix it.
 
Fair preview. Not a whole lot of specifics, reads like a summary of the what is already written up on the paradox site. Good to see it getting some press anyway...
 
Duuk said:
Not a bad review.

Seems to be pretty happy with the game overall while snidly commenting that it isn't a huge leap from EU2.

That makes it sound good for me since I loved EU2 and could have lived without Victoria :D

I second that. I don't care if it's similar to EU2: I like EU2 even 2 years after it's release. Victoria and HoI had a lot of new stuff and was pretty different from EU2 - and I didn't like that. So I won't complain. :)
 
Hive said:
I second that. I don't care if it's similar to EU2: I like EU2 even 2 years after it's release. Victoria and HoI had a lot of new stuff and was pretty different from EU2 - and I didn't like that. So I won't complain. :)
In my very important opinion, Victoria is the best game so far and you are just lazy bums who dont want to try to play a new game. :p
Of course, i wont complain if CK resembles EU in some way, it would be very good anyway.
 
I also thought Vic was the best. And hope this one is more complex at a lower level, IE, ruling smaller realm, but with more options...