• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Mon-Thur from 1915 CET for me, as long as before time bonuses are dropped.
 
Mulliman said:
That would suck :).

Well there's certainly enough interest for two campaigns I think. Of course it would have to be 50% oversubscribed to guarentee that we had enough people show up for each one.
 
We ought to look for ways to curb the immense wealth available in WATk3. I really don't like the idea of another game where all the frontrunners max out techs by 1650. How bout if we edit in inflation for everybody, 2 percent every session or maybe 20 percent every 100 years?

At the least, I insist on a 1492. 1453 is dead, it's been given overkill already. We really should just leave it alone now, and we'll all be better off that way.
 
King John said:
At the least, I insist on a 1492. 1453 is dead, it's been given overkill already. We really should just leave it alone now, and we'll all be better off that way.
Agree. By a bazillion points.

Also, I would really like to stress that an early start is advantageous :).
 
FAL said:
You mean you can't make it 19:15 CET as well? or?

I can make it for 1915, but only just. Certainly not 10 minutes before every time.
 
King John said:
We ought to look for ways to curb the immense wealth available in WATk3. I really don't like the idea of another game where all the frontrunners max out techs by 1650. How bout if we edit in inflation for everybody, 2 percent every session or maybe 20 percent every 100 years?

At the least, I insist on a 1492. 1453 is dead, it's been given overkill already. We really should just leave it alone now, and we'll all be better off that way.

Well, why not stick with vanilla then? Actually wouldn't mind playing 1568 with Hive's mod again.
 
Amp, missed your ICQ the other night. PM me when you get a chance. I tried PMing you but it said your inbox was full. ;)

EDIT: I'm on ICQ now btw.
 
Last edited:
Mulliman said:
The case went like Ego described it, and I take full blame from it. However, in the game I played just before that, I was the most reliable player, being on time and available every session, or arranging a sub the few times I had to be absent. When I'm comitted to a campaign, its 100%.

Also, available days are tuesday, thursday, saturday (day) and sunday (day).

That's all I need to hear. Welcome aboard. :)
 
Ulschmidt said:
We could split the campaign in two groups.

Not really an option, methinks. Imo it is a good thing we seem to have such a vast interest at present. Still something always comes up and hence it is better to be prepared by numbers. ;)
 
admiral drake said:
land sliders should just be locked at 5

and vassal rule should give us more time to annex 10year is rather short unles your really big vs a really small ai mayby give us 30years atleast
and a period at start so ai can be annexed

Hmm. We already have a period at start to annex the ai. Remember that this vassal-rule only applies once you have more than 50 MP.

Then again I would have naught against extending the vassalization period for bit, say, 5 years. 30 however seems to be a bit extreme to me.

What does the rest think?
 
Miozozny said:
I am interested in joining, but I can only play on sunday, monday, wednesday or thursday. And sunday is the only day I can play before 19:00 CET.

Most people seem to be able to play on tuesdays. Would you be able to make it then too? I would love to have you aboard but we have to go with the date that works for the majority. :)
 
Ampoliros said:
Hmm. We already have a period at start to annex the ai. Remember that this vassal-rule only applies once you have more than 50 MP.

Then again I would have naught against extending the vassalization period for bit, say, 5 years. 30 however seems to be a bit extreme to me.

What does the rest think?


what about 20years and we can keep vassals first 50years of the game, some people start with 50mp, wich isn't really much in watk
 
King John said:
We ought to look for ways to curb the immense wealth available in WATk3. I really don't like the idea of another game where all the frontrunners max out techs by 1650. How bout if we edit in inflation for everybody, 2 percent every session or maybe 20 percent every 100 years?

Interesting idea. I fear it would further weaken those nations that are not performing to best standards though and hence lead to people losing interest and quitting.

King John said:
At the least, I insist on a 1492. 1453 is dead, it's been given overkill already. We really should just leave it alone now, and we'll all be better off that way.

Definetly 1492. :)
 
Aladar said:
I'm interested for sure too.

Venice if you please.

Tuesday - thursdays are good, anything after 18.00 CET.

Welcome. Nice to see you again, Aladar. :)
 
admiral drake said:
what about 20years and we can keep vassals first 50years of the game, some people start with 50mp, wich isn't really much in watk

Sounds like a viable compromise to me. Is the rest ok with this?
 
PJL said:
Mon-Thur from 1915 CET for me, as long as before time bonuses are dropped.

On Time Bonuses will most definetly not be dropped. Sorry, PJL, but I have had to endure too much nervekilling torture waiting for some latecomers in V-net. It kills the fun of all that are ontime and leads to a vicious circle where noone deems it worthwhile to turn up punctualy anymore.
 
All: Tuesday seems to be the day that, at present at least, works for most players. Is there anyone who can absolutely not play on tuesdays? Please say so now.