-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I was just wondering-what files do i have to modify in order to add new events and leaders (stolen from MDS)? Is it something to do with those Russian files I can't open?
Hey i know this is sort of nitpicking--but none of Italy's tech teams have biology as a speciality.
Digoo said:
Why? Carriers have been very important in modern warfare, the 2003 Iraqi Invasion is a good example. I can't understand why you'd take this ability away.
All countries will have regular random leader in next version. Many countries will be with new ministers. As also - I always need help with ministers... Or I may generate them at randomloki1232 said:
I don't make everything in project. Maybe, developer had his own reasons?loki1232 said:
You may use carrires. You can't make only two missions. You can't bomb land by CAGs even in vanilla, and port & bases are not important in TNW as i think.maxhomer said:
After playing for a bit I'd say every nation's IC is way, way too low. Do they all have the same as the vanilla? A good way to calculate IC would be to somehow make it proportional to modern GDP, which you can see here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)
GDP has nothing to do with the capabilities of a countries industry, although I agree that it should be changed(modified)
No, I use only industry rating of GDP for IC calculation. After it - my subjective peacetime modifers and effecs of technologies.maxhomer said:
I don't think IC is too low, some countries really almost have no heavy industry.
I can agree with small minor changes, but i will use my concept in whole.Mihail said:
If that is how it's ment to be, do not change it, I merely think a few states should have a bit higher or lower, but they are about where I would like to seem them, after all, we are not exactly talking about a war time industry, that the great war.
I think it's ok...the thing I'm worried about is can russia, chc, prk, etc. support that IC at full war settings, more often than not they are all set except 4 1 resource (usually energy) then...boom! They have less IC than austria. Still very impressive set up you have, the only issues I've seen so far have already been stated (no ministers/leaders, every1's isolationistic, AI not willing 2 retake captured provinces from guerilla's, events, etc.) but something caught my eye...why do subs have such low org (16 4 LA class)? At those levels it'd be tantamount to suicide in sending them out, subs might have vulnerabilities but this doesn't look right. Anyway...need help?
1. Russia, China have peacetime modifers, but they are low. Also techs affect this modifier too.jose1357 said:
2. I create startup initial trade treates between important countries. Now AI can survive, he has -5..-20 in some resource. I will continue work in this direction.
3. We are working with ministers. ENG, USA, RUS, JAP, GER, Fra, BRA... (LAT, KAZ...) already have them or are in progress. But ministers are own headache
:wacko:
4. All countries will have random regular leaders in next version.
5. Isolationism is all right. It is feature. This project implies quite long peacetime development through (alt-)history & dynamic random events.
6. AI... No one from our team is good with AI. I and my team comrade tried to create +/- workable static silly AI for 1996
7. Events! I have billions ideas about events =) But i think events must be the last phase in MOD. I am working with some events now
8. I wanted to make SS with low org like in HSR, maybe a bit more. They shouldn't have large period of fighting. I will look at subs for carefully soon, you are not the first who is angry with them.
9. Yes! We always need help! What can you do?
(P.S. i will leave online for a week today, but we really need help!)
if you need any research done, contact me. I've got no real experience w/ modding, but worst case scenario I can fiddle around w/ Hoi2 events & change them 4 modern times. Speaking of ministers, have u gotten the go ahead from mds2 to use theirs? Granted they're only good from c.2000 on but... as for the subs, since they can't carry nukes (never got this, kinda defeats the purpose of having them), maybe you can just make the ICBM's have longer range (mds2 icbms have 9000mi) so that if ww3 happens we have the ability 2 hit 'em hard
I have only early version of MDS, there is no much ministers there. If you can send me minister's files from MDS with pictures from your latest version - it will be great!jose1357 said:if you need any research done, contact me. I've got no real experience w/ modding, but worst case scenario I can fiddle around w/ Hoi2 events & change them 4 modern times. Speaking of ministers, have u gotten the go ahead from mds2 to use theirs? Granted they're only good from c.2000 on but... as for the subs, since they can't carry nukes (never got this, kinda defeats the purpose of having them), maybe you can just make the ICBM's have longer range (mds2 icbms have 9000mi) so that if ww3 happens we have the ability 2 hit 'em hard
I don't like idea about range... Maybe i will even reduce it
And what researches would you like to do? Today we need information about ministers :wacko: only. And event writers will be necessary, but only always in touch writer - for deep events discussion.
In my early tests I have no problems with AI building units by default AI-schemejose1357 said: