• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Kind of feels like the Chinese flood events should be made a once per campaign thing, if not removed entirely. It's just getting silly at this point.
Either that or make a similar and less punishing event for every major river in the world (Danube, Rhine, Nile, Euphrates, Ganges, Mississippi, Amazon, Volga, etc.). I think that the idea behind it, the Yellow River Flood weakening your mandate as a sign of disapproval from Heaven is realistic, but can be a bit too punishing. Perhaps it might be a good idea to have the penalties scale with positive and negative stability (where the higher your stability is, the less punishing it is; while the lower it is, the more punishing).
 
  • 2Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
Thanks for the patch!

I don't know if it is intented - though I do not see it in the changelog - but it seems that apanages now count in the war participation (they get a share with war payments for example).
 
I can confirm with @sebsam02 Provonce doesn't get annexed.

Also something i have already posted. France losses the Strong duchies estate from the nobility when you remove "french strong duchies" they don't have access to both of them after to complete the related mission.

 
Aragon is still the only Iberian country that has no access to the 'refined tercios' trait for their unique unit, as both required missions ('Assemble the Tercios' and 'Refine the Tercios') are not integrated in the Spanish mission tree if formed by Aragon. They should be removed from 'Universal Monarchy' mission branch and shifted to the shared mission tree.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
  • 1
Reactions:
I don't play EU4 much since CK3 came out, but on the Yellow River flood question: AFAIK the lower Rhine (Netherlands) is the only other place in the early modern world where a river was both so prone to flooding if man-made defences were neglected and so devastating if it did flood. And a lot of the Dutch problems were due to the sea, not really the Rhine. So the Yellow River floods should be catastrophic and really hurt the player.

And if your dev is below 15 your flood defences probably aren't in a great shape because the local authorities lack the people and money to maintain them.
 
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
I was hoping to play the new DLC now but judging by comments it appears I should still wait.... After Leviathan I would've expected a lot stricter polishing for expansions but it appears I was mistaken. Waiting a month for the game and expansion to be fixed is ridiculous. Please just make EU V and/or stop touching EU IV. Tinto is swinging one for four so far, I have serious doubts about the stability of the game for the upcoming Middle Eastern expansion. The game turns 10 this year, just leave it alone at this point.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2
  • 1
Reactions:
I was hoping to play the new DLC now but judging by comments it appears I should still wait.... After Leviathan I would've expected a lot stricter polishing for expansions but it appears I was mistaken. Waiting a month for the game and expansion to be fixed is ridiculous. Please just make EU V and/or stop touching EU IV. Tinto is swinging one for four so far, I have serious doubts about the stability of the game for the upcoming Middle Eastern expansion. The game turns 10 this year, just leave it alone at this point.
In addition to what's been said in the other comments I think it's worth mentioning that the daimyo and japan mission trees seem to logically conflict and imply the preferred route is to conquer all of Japan and conquer all of Korea and parts of China + colonize Siberia, the New World, and Taiwan before you form Japan because you lose all of your expansion missions except for getting the "Conquer China" cb after you form Japan. The mission trees also have you doubling up on doing the same things. Honestly would have made more sense to make the daimyo tree a tree that can become the new Japan tree rather than the new Japan tree completely replacing the daimyo tree.
 
  • 10
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I don't play EU4 much since CK3 came out, but on the Yellow River flood question: AFAIK the lower Rhine (Netherlands) is the only other place in the early modern world where a river was both so prone to flooding if man-made defences were neglected and so devastating if it did flood. And a lot of the Dutch problems were due to the sea, not really the Rhine. So the Yellow River floods should be catastrophic and really hurt the player.

And if your dev is below 15 your flood defences probably aren't in a great shape because the local authorities lack the people and money to maintain them.

I agree that the flood event should really hurt the player. But, the problem was that the earliest version hurt too much, and the flood wasn't really manageable. One can argue about the seriousness of the flood events and whether they should be nerfed. But, I believe the devs have made changes based on their judgement of the issue, and based on the overall comment of the community.

Therefore, they nerfed them a bit, which are like -10 mandate instead of -20 and -2 stability instead of 3? The devastation and development hit remain the same. So, I think your arguement based on Dutch river isn't really valid. Because the economic hit wasn't nerfed, they nerfted only stability and mandate, which are more related to broad mechanism and playthrough experience and AI ability to handle EoC and etc.

Regardless, the plan of the devs was that player/AI can use a mission called "Tame China's Sorrow" to tarckle the problem. However, they forgot to cover yangtze river flood in that event. Thus, people complained and devs made a change.

Moreover, the purpose of 1.35.3 is just, fix a bug.

The code for the floods was meant to be something like:

every_owned_province = {
limit = {
"provinces near yangtze river, which are getting flooded"
}
"reduce some development for all those qualified provinces"
}

But, they wrote:

limit = {
"every province you owned right now"
}

So, if you play Ming and conquer like Inida or Mongol in 1.35.2, India and Mongol will get flooded, which is surely a bug and would really impact on Ming and surrounding playthroughs. For example, if you play manchu and japan, you will still be stunded by this event and even if you don't take mandate you will still get every province you took from Ming devastated. So, it is serious and need fixing. Thus, we have 1.35.3.

So, in my opinion, flood related content in 1.35.2 and .3 aren't about flood not being punishing enough. It's just normal twicks that happen after every DLC releases.
 
  • 2
  • 1Like
  • 1
  • 1
Reactions:
I'm curious if this is WAD or a bug or oversight but are other nations meant to lose huge amounts of crown land to the eunuch estate when they spawn after taking the mandate?

I recently went from a stable 35% crown land to 5% from just the eunuch estate spawning when I took the mandate as Dai Viet.
 
  • 2
Reactions:
"Eyalets now count as your border, meaning you can core provinces next to them."with only my eyalets border another nation, the CB ottoman invasion doesn't work, is it bug to be fixed or is intended to be so?
 
I feel like the developers bit off more than they could chew in 1.35. They reworked half the world, but it comes along with too many new bugs to fix. It's a fabulous update, but there are bound to be many bugs with such a large scope.
 
  • 5
Reactions:
I feel like the developers bit off more than they could chew in 1.35. They reworked half the world, but it comes along with too many new bugs to fix. It's a fabulous update, but there are bound to be many bugs with such a large scope.
I agreed as well, perhaps this patch and DLC should be delay for another half a year to provide the best experience but alas what's done is done. I hope that in next patches, they can be polished.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions:
"Eyalets now count as your border, meaning you can core provinces next to them."with only my eyalets border another nation, the CB ottoman invasion doesn't work, is it bug to be fixed or is intended to be so?
I believe it only counts as your border as in the statement, nothing more, nothing less. Eyalets are pretty broken as is, but justifying invasions left and right without a direct land border would be a whole another level of brokenness.

Got a message about my .2 save might not working properly with.3, is that true? Would hate to not get accomplishments in my England game.
Worked for me just fine, but if you want to be extra safe, just make a copy of save before loading it.