• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

etranger01

Sphinx of the Tuileries
92 Badges
Aug 18, 2010
1.125
86
  • 500k Club
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • For The Glory
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • March of the Eagles
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Surviving Mars: Digital Deluxe Edition
  • Tyranny: Gold Edition
  • Victoria 2
Hello and welcome to World in Revolution: 1836 Mk. III. This game is a (somewhat) new entry in the series originally created by Frymonmon. Though it uses the timeframe from a previous WiR game (that never quite got off the ground), this isn’t a continuation, but instead something of a reboot. I’m etranger01 and I’m the Game Moderator for 1836 Mk. III, serving as both arbiter and final authority for all in-game actions, as well as maintaining and establishing the world in which you, the players, play your nations. Stormbringer will be assisting me as the resident stats guru; he’s in charge of all those complex number things that make the game run smoothly.

Nation Applications are: Open/CLOSED
12/12 Nations Selected

The premise of the game is fairly simple: You represent a nation in the year 1836, entrusted with the guidance of your state and its people through a period of incredible change and progress. In the coming year, Queen Victoria will inherit the throne of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland; historically, her leadership of the world’s largest empire left such a mark on world events that the period is now known as the Victorian era by many historians. However, as of January 1st, 1836, all bets are off, because while events will remain influenced by historical factors and forces, you and the decisions you make will be the single largest determinant of your country’s future direction. Will you take a great nation and steer it successfully through an era of unprecedented chaos and strife, or will you let it be engulfed by the rising tides of ideology and nationalism? Will you assume control of a lesser state and from humble beginnings achieve true global renown, or will you languish in obscurity and poverty? It’s all up to you and the fickle whims of Fate, as embodied by me.

Rules and Procedures
The game is broken up into turns, each representing a single year from January to December, starting with the year 1836. Between the end of one turn and the beginning of another, there will be a yearly update, which will cover the events of the previous turn, whether player-driven, historical, or GM-invented. During the course of the turn, there may also be periodic crisis updates, which cover new developments on the international scene. As GM, I will be responsible for producing both the yearly and crisis updates.

Between updates, players are encouraged to make in-character posts, representing either public announcements from their national government or events and historical entries from an academic perspective. These posts may also narrate events going on within your country that aren’t covered by the updates, but all narratives must be cleared with the GM before they’re posted. In-character posts, or IC, are crucial to ensuring that your nation’s positions are publicly known, and are increasingly crucial as you ascend in the national rankings. IC may have tangible effects depending on its quality and content, ranging from a change in public opinion to a one-turn bonus on an order relating to your IC.

I’ll keep the rules on player behavior to a minimum, beyond “don’t be a jerk,” but I do ask that all players keep the out-of-character chatter out of the thread if at all possible. Any questions, comments, or concerns should be sent to me either via forum PM or over PM on IRC. Any inter-player OOC should be conducted in PMs or on IRC. Do not notify me of a PM in-thread if I haven’t responded to it, do not air your issues with an update or a ruling in public, and keep things civil even outside the thread. I won’t hesitate to boot a player because they’re being disruptive, so keep that in mind.

Orders
Every turn, players will be required to submit a set of orders to me via forum private message, representing the primary events in their nation for the year. The number and type of orders permitted vary depending on the player’s nation, but should generally be a substantial paragraph including research and justification for whatever's being carried out. At present, there are only two types of orders, which will be enumerated below. Further order types may become available as the game progresses.

General Orders are the main type of order and can be used for virtually anything, but are generally allocated toward either improving the nation, addressing a national issue, or interacting with another nation. Increasing industrialization, improving trade, reforming the army or the navy, recruiting soldiers, building ships, laying down railroads, signing treaties, and expanding a colony are just a few of the possible uses for a General Order. If you’re not sure if your idea falls within the scope of a General Order, feel free to ask, but chances are that it does. General Orders can include actions performed by non-governmental sources or historical events that you want to have an in-game effect on your nation or its stats.

An example General Order from the United Kingdom in 1846:

“Repeal the Importation Act of 1815, also known as the Corn Laws, to remove trade barriers and permit the importation of cheap staple foods from foreign countries. This will stimulate trade and reduce food prices, encouraging a migration of workers from rural farms to urban factories.”

War Orders are limited-scope orders only available to nations that are in conflict with another nation or a rebel movement. They pertain to the various actions that can be taken while at war or dealing with conflict, such as the movement of soldiers or ships, the mobilization of reserves, and other military endeavors.

An example War Order from the Kingdom of Prussia in 1866:

“Following the victory at Gitschin, pursue the Austrian army further into northern Bohemia and concentrate all nearby forces on the area to force a decisive battle. Hit them from multiple sides with smaller individual forces and prevent them from concentrating at any one point.”

As in life, nothing in your orders is a sure thing, and the possibility of failure is very real. Two factors in your orders will play a role in mitigating the chance of failure: their possibility and their plausibility. When I get your orders, I will evaluate them to determine how possible and how plausible the order is given the resources of your nation, the national mood, and the context in which they’re presented. An order that lacks either plausibility or possibility is prone to failure, while orders that are both implausible and impossible may result in not just failure but backlash. If you’re concerned that an order is implausible or impossible, just ask, though bear in mind that I won’t pre-approve your entire set of orders or give you any indications on their actual chances of success or failure.

A Great Power is entitled to three General Orders and two War Orders, while a Secondary Power is entitled to two General Orders and one War Order.

Justifications
The Victorian Era is the Golden Age of Hypocrisy. There’s a lot of moralizing going on, both on a personal and national level, while actual morals are fairly scarce. Subjugation, persecution, violence, and greed are all rampant, concealed behind facades of perfect rectitude and upright behavior. Unlike later results-driven eras, the ends do not justify the means; the reality of what you’re doing is often secondary to the reason why you’re doing it and, perhaps more importantly, how it and you are perceived in the process.

Therefore, in 1836 Mk. II, I will be placing significant value on the justification provided for national actions, whether in the form of orders, diplomacy, or in-character statements. Justified orders, as enumerated previously regarding possibility and plausibility, have a much higher chance of success. An order that’s the subject of an in-character statement providing a socially acceptable and moral rationale for its existence is far more plausible than naked aggression or lust for power in the Victorian sensibility.

Additionally, I have implemented a Casus Belli system in 1836 Mk. II, representing the common Victorian belief that a conflict must be fully justified prior to being initiated and that a hallmark of civilized behavior is that of honorable conduct in all things. Prior to a nation’s initial declaration of war, it must possess a Casus Belli relevant to the country it is attacking, or else substantial penalties will be levied against that nation, representing outrage and dissent both inside and outside the government. A Casus Belli can either result naturally from events, whether from an update or another nation’s in-character statement, or it can be manufactured through an order or an in-character statement. In order to use a Casus Belli, there must be a formal and public in-character declaration of war against the appropriate party, citing the relevant grievances.

IRC Channel
The WiR community meets for OOC discussion on Internet Relay Chat, and there is quite a lot that goes on there, including informal negotiations and random chatting. Though all of the in-character business of the game should be conducted in the thread, the IRC channel is a great resource if you have questions, comments, or concerns. If I’m online, chances are that I’m on IRC, and I recommend that you join the channel to contact me or other players. It’s also a fun place to be!

Link: www.coldfront.net
Channel: #WiR_Main
Instructions:
1) Go to www.coldfront.net.
2) Choose the Flash app or the Java app.
3) Create a screen name; it’s recommended that you use your forum name, if available.
4) Close the #coldfront channel that opens automatically.
5) In the command box, type “/join #WiR_Main” without the quotation marks.
6) You’re in the chat! Welcome!
 
Last edited:
Current Game Roster (as of 1838)

The Great Powers
The Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland: Frymonmon
The Kingdom of France: Spectre17
The Russian Empire: jacob-Lundgren
The Austrian Empire: Haresus
The Kingdom of Prussia: Matth34
The Ottoman Empire: Noco19

The Secondary Powers
The Kingdom of Spain: nachopontmercy
The Kingdom of Sardinia: Riccardo93
The Kingdom of the Netherlands: Bonecracker(NL)
The Kingdom of Belgium: Groogy
The Kingdom of Sweden: Firelordsky
The Eyalet of Egypt: LatinKaiser
 
Last edited:
The News of the World - January-December 1835

The Great Powers
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
The United Kingdom stands at the apex of its strength, a truly global empire whose reach extends to every habitable continent, enforcing its dominance through the twin pillars of finance and naval might. The dawning Industrial Revolution has its roots in British innovation and the methods of British industry are now emulated by other, lesser powers. The United Kingdom is powerful, it is prosperous, and it is at peace with the world, safe and secure behind its wooden wall.

However, the task of maintaining and expanding imperial hegemony on a global scale is not an easy one, especially given the rising tides of liberalism and nationalism that have become known on the world stage. There is a popular movement growing within Britain that seeks greater equality and greater freedoms for the working man, one that is demanding an end to governmental corruption and aristocratic domination with an increasingly strident tone. The ongoing unrest in the Americas imperils British interests, particularly the unresolved border with the United States, while the threat of an Ottoman collapse is an ever-present concern and the lucrative opium trade to the Far East has made Britain few friends among the native rulers.

These are just a few of the many problems confronting the United Kingdom, at a time in which strong royal leadership is not forthcoming from a gravely ill King William IV, nor is much expected from his successor, a virtually unknown young woman with no political experience whatsoever. The coming era will be one of great change and turmoil; will Britain survive and thrive in this new time of possibility, or will the sun finally set on the British Empire, once and for all?

The Kingdom of France
Though one of Europe’s oldest and most established states, the Kingdom of France has seen nothing but turmoil and strife since the dawn of the century. Only five years previous, the deeply unpopular Bourbon Restoration was brought to an abrupt end by the July Revolution, leading to the subsequent ascension of the Orleanist King Louis Philippe. Choosing to reign as King of the French in recognition of his popular mandate, he proclaimed the necessity of “a just middle, equally distant from the excesses of popular power and the abuses of royal power”.

While Louis Philippe’s dream of a centrist regime still lives, it is precariously balanced between numerous sides of a deeply divided French public and burdened by foreign entanglements inherited from his Bourbon cousins. The disputes between Republicans, Legitimists, and Ultra-royalists are growing increasingly acrimonious, with the King forced to mediate between them to avoid outright violence. In the wake of a Republican assassination attempt against the King and his heirs, new laws have streamlined the process of conviction and restricted freedom of the press, further inflaming the radical left. Meanwhile, across the Mediterranean from this domestic drama, the bloody occupation of Algeria grinds on toward its sixth year, resisted bitterly by the natives and their chieftains.

With France divided into ideological camps and its armies mired in a continuous struggle against Algerian tribesmen, can the July Monarchy heal the deep wounds left by the Houses of Bourbon and Bonaparte, or will the internal tensions of the nation rend it asunder, paving the way for yet another new regime?

The Russian Empire​
Though the world has moved on since the age of Napoleon, Russia has largely remained as it was: a sprawling Eurasian empire whose Romanov dynasty embodies the concept of the absolute monarch, with easily Europe’s largest army and substantial fleets in the Baltic and Black Seas. The sheer number of men Russia can call upon to defend itself is staggering, and the unparalleled width and depth of Russia’s territory was arguably the greatest contributing factor to the downfall of the previously undefeatable Napoleon.

Though reforms began as early as Peter the Great, the new Emperor, Nicholas I, responded to a wave of uprisings early in his reign by embracing a wholly reactionary ideology of Autocracy, Orthodoxy, and Nationality in an effort to achieve stability, no matter what the cost. Unfortunately, this has stalled any and all forward movement for the country, with many of its people still toiling in virtual slavery. The Russian economy is backward and its governance inefficient and corrupt, leaving most of its vast natural resources untapped. To maintain Russia’s image of imperial dominance and unparalleled strength, the Empire has been forced to go into substantial debt, leaving it in a precarious and unsustainable position.

With ardent Slavophiles arguing against the adoption of Western ideals and a thoroughly reactionary Emperor on the throne, Russia seems impervious to the winds of change. However, such outward strength conceals an inner brittleness, and there is a great deal in store for the Russian Empire in the coming era. Though Nicholas’ Autocratic, Orthodox, and Nationalist beliefs may seem to be a return to the past, they mark a new era in national ideology for Russia, and with them has come improvements to Russian schools as they adapt to teach these new concepts. Change is coming to Russia; what remains to be seen is whether it will create a stronger, more vibrant nation or herald the collapse of a great empire.

The Kingdom of Prussia​
Famously described by Voltaire as “an army with a nation”, the Kingdom of Prussia is in many ways defined by its military tradition, stretching back to the Great Elector and extending to Frederick the Great. Relying on the reforms made by Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, Prussia remains one of the few European nations to engage in the practice of universal service and its highly professional officer corps mark it as one of the few nations to have truly internalized the military consequences of the Napoleonic Wars. Industry is on the rise within Prussia, particularly in its coal-rich Rheinish provinces, and it is poised to reap great benefits from the Industrial Revolution.

Despite its military power and industrial promise, Prussia is not without its own problems. There is a growing trend of republicanism and liberalism in Germany, one which stands opposed to the absolutist principles of the Prussian kingdom. The Congress of Vienna included the formation of a German Confederation with the Austrian Empire at its head, forcing the Hohenzollern rulers of Prussia to acknowledge their Habsburg rivals as “first among equals”. And though the Partitions of Poland divided up the Polish lands between Prussia, Russia, and Austria, the Polish people still dream of independence from German or Russian rule.

Now, at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, Prussia stands at a crossroads. The rise of nationalism as a force during the Napoleonic Wars has influenced many Prussian liberals toward the idea of German pan-nationalism, but their concept of a democratic, constitutional Germany is at odds with Prussian ideals of autocracy and order. With the rise of Prussian industry will come the rise of unlanded capitalists to compete with the Junkers for control over the direction of the state. Can the House of Hohenzollern navigate the treacherous political currents and retain their hold over their hard-won kingdom, or will it all slip away in the rising tide of ideology and nationalism?

The Austrian Empire​
Once the undisputed rulers of the Holy Roman Empire and arguably the most widespread and influential ruling house in Europe, the House of Habsburg still retains much of its power through its massive empire, centered around its ancestral Austrian lands. As “first among equals” in the German Confederation, it exercises great influence over the German states and is widely recognized as the pre-eminent German nation. Though its influence in the Confederation is occasionally challenged by the upstart Hohenzollern Kings of Prussia, they are not considered a serious opponent by most learned observers.

As with other large empires, a display of outward strength and influence masks pervasive internal weaknesses. Emperor Ferdinand of Austria is incapable of ruling in his own right, crippled by near-constant seizures, and an informal regency council handles the affairs of state on his behalf. Nationalist forces are constantly moving beneath the empire’s surface, threatening its continued existence with the threat of revolution. The Austrian leadership is deeply conservative and opposes conciliation toward liberals or any attempts toward progress. It remains to be seen whether an empire divided by ideology and ethnicity can long survive in this new age of industry and nationalism.

With a dominant diplomatic position within Germany and extensive lands with great potential for development, Austria has significant promise if it can somehow overcome its manifold ethnic problems and reforge the disparate pieces of the empire into a single cohesive whole. However, the liberals cannot be ignored forever, and the House of Habsburg may well need to descend from its lofty tower to address its subjects’ needs, lest the empire’s foundation be undermined from below.

The Ottoman Empire​
A Great Power largely by courtesy, the Ottoman Empire has experienced a steady, inexorable decline since the turn of the century, with the Serbian and Greek revolutions creating further cracks in an already shaky foundation. The Empire has largely stagnated since its glory days, with widespread corruption and little technological progress to match the great advances of the West. The governor of Egypt, Muhammad Ali, rules as a sovereign in all but name and currently occupies vast swathes of Syria and the Levant in defiance of the Ottoman Sultan’s will. As nationalism rears its head and Ottoman weakness grows with each passing year, the House of Osman faces a crucial choice: attempt reforms to an archaic system and risk it all collapsing at once, or let the entire empire slowly slip out of their grasp forever.

Unfortunately for the Sultan, the choice may not be entirely his. The July Monarchy of France has a vested interest in seeing Muhammad Ali succeed in his ambition to rule the whole of the Empire, while Britain and Austria see the potential disintegration of the Ottomans as a source of great concern. Even should those three powers refrain from intervention, the ever-present threat of Russia from the north is a constant source of concern and fear. The Eastern Question is a complex one, with a multiplicity of internal factors and external interests in play. Will the Ottomans resolve it in a sustainable fashion, or will the Sick Man of Europe succumb to his wasting disease and be destroyed from within?


The Secondary Powers
The Kingdom of Spain​
Times are tough for what used to be the world’s largest and most powerful empire. Once encompassing the majority of two continents with a substantial presence in two more, the Spanish colonial empire has declined to little more than islands in the Caribbean and the East Indies, along with a few isolated trading posts in Africa. The treasure fleets are long gone, with the remnants of the once-vaunted Spanish Armada reduced to anti-piracy patrols and coastal defense. Meanwhile, the Spanish homeland stagnates, rendered backward and undeveloped due to the overwhelming power of the Catholic clergy and the regional nobility. All of these would be significant problems in their own right, but they are further aggrieved by one final issue: the succession crisis.

Prior to King Ferdinand II’s death, he issued the Pragmatic Sanction, allowing his daughter Isabella to succeed him and shifting his brother, Carlos, out of the line of succession. This point of royal intrigue quickly grew to encompass many of the internal problems facing Spain, including regional autonomy, the role of the Church, and the growing rift between the liberals and the conservatives. Now in its second year, the Carlist War has left Spain deeply divided, and the only hope for Isabella’s liberal, centralized regime is a victory on the battlefield against the forces of absolutism and reaction.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands
Formed as the United Kingdom of the Netherlands following the Congress of Vienna, the Dutch state reached the height of its European territorial extent in the fifteen years following the fall of Napoleon, with undisputed control over the rich Southern Netherlands as well as extensive holdings in the East Indies. The southern provinces contributed greatly to the Dutch economy, with their growing industry unmatched outside of Great Britain, in sharp contrast to the almost wholly unindustrialized north. The Dutch government used the subsequent revenue to establish a remarkable new educational system across both halves of the nation, establishing more than 1,500 state schools.

Unfortunately, the divide between north and south was not limited to industrialization. The French-speaking noblemen of the Southern Netherlands bitterly resented King William’s attempts to establish Dutch as the language of Flanders, while the Catholic clergy opposed his Protestant state schools and suppression of Catholic authority in the south. The resulting dissent culminated in the Belgian revolution of 1830, in which the southern provinces threw off Dutch rule and proclaimed Leopold of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld as their new sovereign. The Netherlands does not recognize the independence of its southern territories despite their inability to enforce their claim, leaving a great unhealed wound in the Low Countries.

The Kingdom of Sardinia​
Also known as Sardinia-Piedmont, the Kingdom of Sardinia is the smaller of the two major Italian states, but its relevance is secured through two principal areas of effort: its military and its industry. Unlike Naples to the south, the House of Savoy has encouraged the development of a large, professional army, somewhat out of proportion to the size of its lands or population, as a legacy of its harsh experiences in the Napoleonic Wars. Moreover, the Sardinian state is one of the few nations of Europe to have begun the process of industrialization, with its factories largely concentrated in Piedmont itself.

The dawn of the Victorian era brings with it a new era of Italian nationalism, with patriots across the peninsula seeking to acknowledge their cultural and linguistic relations and unify beneath a single government, for the greater glory of Italy. However, should the House of Savoy take on this fledgling movement, there are substantial obstacles, including its own monarchy’s harsh reactionary bent. More troubling is the continued domination of the Austrian Empire in Lombardy and Venetia, perhaps some of the wealthiest and most populated areas of Italy. If the Kingdom of Sardinia seeks to unify the Italian lands, something about the current equation must change and it must change substantially if they are to have a reasonable chance of success.

The Kingdom of Sweden​
Officially known as the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway, to reflect the personal union binding Norway to the Swedish king, the truth is that Sweden remains by far the dominant partner in the arrangement. Having seized and forcibly imposed the personal union in the final years of the Napoleonic Wars, the resulting subjugation was met with Norwegian discontent that persists to this day. Regardless, the union has proved durable and the result is that Sweden possesses one of the largest land areas in Europe, with a population that has nearly doubled in the last century. Widely considered the foremost Scandinavian power, Sweden is in a strong position due to its extensive iron mines, its size, and the relative popularity of the House of Bernadotte for its adherence to a constitutional form of monarchy.

Unfortunately, the dominance that Sweden once displayed in Northern Europe prior to Napoleon has disappeared entirely, due to a general technological stagnation and lack of ambition by its monarchs and prime ministers. Despite its fully functional parliament, the Riksdag, Sweden itself is deeply conservative and far more so than its ostensible union partner, Norway, leading to inevitable friction between the two. The crisis Sweden faces is not one of pressing danger or disunion, but rather that of impending obsolescence. Will the core of the once-great Swedish Empire be content to watch the rest of Europe pass it by, to ignore the trends of industry and commerce sweeping the civilized world, or will it exert itself once more and achieve greatness?

The Kingdom of Belgium​
Having won its independence five years previously, the Kingdom of Belgium remains a new feature on the European landscape, unforeseen by the Congress of Vienna and its existence is thus very much an unsettled issue. Created as a union of French-speaking Wallonian southerners and Dutch-speaking Flemish northerners, Belgium lacks a unifying cultural identity in the manner of many other nations and has instead come together in direct opposition to the heavy-handed Protestantism of the Dutch royal family.

For Belgium, there is only one issue of importance at the moment: securing permanent, internationally recognized independence from its former Dutch masters. Everything else is secondary.

The Eyalet of Egypt​
Unbeknownst to most of the civilized world, Muhammad Ali of Egypt has consolidated his hold on a substantial portion of the Ottoman Empire and transformed Egypt from a backward province into a powerful, semi-modern state. European-style industry has been built in Cairo, managed by expatriate French experts, and a series of canals now irrigate cotton farms down the length of the Nile.

With substantial economic might and a modern military built along the post-Napoleonic model, the upstart provincial governor has a strong base from which to launch his campaign for the Ottoman throne and, in so doing, shake the very foundations of European society.


The Americas​
In the wake of the national revolutions at the beginning of the century, which have concluded only recently, European influence in continental North and South America is on the wane. Britain maintains British Canada, as well as its island colonies and a small chunk of Central America called Belize, while Guyana is divided up among the British, French, and Dutch. Beyond that, European control is restricted to island colonies in the Caribbean and Atlantic. The remainder of the territory in the Americas is now occupied by post-colonial nations or those tribes which have (perhaps temporarily) escaped subjugation. The United States of America is the pre-eminent post-colonial nation in the Americas, but its decentralized government and lack of ability to project power limit its relevance outside those nations who directly neighbor the republic. The Republic of Mexico is the other major North American power, though its lack of authority is perhaps obvious when considering the fierce struggle it's currently waging against upstart American settlers in its Texas province. Central America is united under one banner for the moment, but many of that nation's constituent states agitate for independence and freedom from Guatemalan hegemony, making long-term stability unlikely.

In South America, nationalism has manifested in numerous and sometimes contradictory forms. The Empire of Brazil is the largest and most powerful of the post-colonial nations in South America, as well as the sole Lusophone nation, leaving it both threatening and isolated among the sea of Spanish-speaking nations while it wages war against the separatist Piratini Republic in its southern provinces. From the dissolution of Gran Colombia five years previous comes three new nations: New Granada, Venezuela, and Ecuador, while in the south the nations of Peru and Bolivia have established a loose federation to combine their economic and military might on the world stage. The Argentine Federation exists, albeit in a somewhat shaky fashion, united by the Governor of Buenos Aires wielding the power of all three branches of government to combat corruption and instability. South America is engulfed in a time of rapid change, in which the only common thread is hostility to European subjugation.


Asia
To the nations of Europe, the Asian continent is flush with riches and backward in nature, making it perfect for their ongoing commercial efforts. The British have extensive holdings and subjects in the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia while maintaining commercial interests in China, while the French still maintain their island colonies as part of their own Asian commercial network. The Dutch are perhaps the second-largest colonial power in Asia with the Dutch East Indies, while Portugal still maintains outposts in India, China, and the East Indies. The two major nations of Asia, Qing China and Tokugawa Japan, have both attempted to limit foreign influence with varying degrees of success. If the door to Asia cannot be opened with gifts and promises, perhaps it will need to be forced open instead...

Africa
The continent of Africa, outside the mostly-civilized northern African nations and a few more substantial British and Portuguese colonies in southern Africa, is a sea of darkness and uncertainty in European eyes. While several nations have created trading posts and forts along the coastline and down coastal rivers in central Africa, there has been little exploration or exploitation beyond that. While Africa may yet become an issue for the ever-expanding imperial nations, at the moment most sensible concerns are directed toward the riches of Asia and the chaos of the Americas.
 
Last edited:
Countries of the World, 1836

United Kingdom
Tier: Tea Power
Government: Constitutional Monarchy
Ideology: Liberal (free trade, laissez faire, anti-military)
Population: 25.715 m.
Economy: £ 50,327 m. (recession)
Industry: £ 2,713 m.
Trade: £ 9,965 m. (35% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Good (0/5)
Administration: Adequate (3/5)
Education: Adequate (1/5)
Income: £ 7,810 m. (23% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 5,742 m. (£ 2,068 m. surplus)
Treasury: £ -42,778 m. (3.90% interest)
Plurality: 0.30
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: Minimal (4/5)
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
18 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Good (3/5)
64 ships of the line
50 frigates
Manpower: 0.066 m.
Technology: Industry (8), Commerce (9), Culture (5), Army (5), Navy* (8)
Player:

Canada
Population: 1.462 m.
Economy: £ 1,599 m.
Income: £ 30 m.
Military garrison: 3 local regiments
Naval squadron: 2 ships of the line and 9 frigates

Caribbean
Population: 1.033 m.
Economy: £ 641 m.
Income: £ 18 m.
Military garrison:
Naval squadron:

South Africa
Population: 0.496 m.
Economy: £ 259 m.
Income: £ 5 m.
Military garrison: 3 European regiments
Naval squadron: 1 frigates

India
Population: 103.537 m.
Economy: £ 55,198 m.
Income: £ 1,096 m.
Military garrison: 3 European regiments and 27 local regiments
Naval squadron:

Australia
Population: 0.448 m.
Economy: £ 445 m.
Income: £ 9 m.
Military garrison: 3 European regiments
Naval squadron:

Malta
Military garrison:
Naval squadron: 6 ships of the line and 16 frigates

Valparaiso
Military garrison:
Naval squadron: 4 frigates

Macau
Military garrison:
Naval squadron: 3 frigates

France
Tier: Frog Power
Government: Constitutional Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, laissez faire, anti-military)
Population: 32.811 m.
Economy: £ 43,015 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 1,026 m.
Trade: £ 5,735 m. (20% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Adequate (3/5)
Administration: Adequate (3/5)
Education: Adequate (2/5)
Income: £ 4,238 m. (21% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 2,482 m. (£ 1,756 m. surplus)
Treasury: £ -6,452 m. (3.96% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (4/5)
26 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Good (0/5)
33 ships of the line
30 frigates
Manpower: 0.263 m.
Technology: Industry (7), Commerce (8), Culture* (6), Army (5), Navy (7)
Player:

Belgium
Tier: Waffle Power
Government: Constitutional Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionsim, anti-military)
Population: 4.662 m.
Economy: £ 6,928 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 171 m.
Trade: £ 577 m. (32% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Good (2/5)
Administration: Adequate (4/5)
Education: Adequate (2/5)
Income: £ 536 m. (20% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 646 m. (£ 109 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -173 m. (4.15% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: Minimal (3/5)
Army quality: Adequate (2/5)
13 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Poor (3/5)
No ships of the line
No frigates
Manpower: 0.007 m.
Technology: Industry (6), Commerce (5), Culture (5), Army (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Netherlands
Tier: Land of Clogs
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, pro-military)
Population: 2.532 m.
Economy: £ 5,481 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 95 m.
Trade: £ 658 m. (35% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Adequate (4/5)
Administration: Adequate (3/5)
Education: Adequate (4/5)
Income: £ 498 m. (21% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 728 m. (£ 230 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -5,755 m. (4.10% interest)
Plurality: 0.30
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
12 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Adequate (4/5)
2 ships of the line
8 frigates
Manpower: 0.000 m.
Technology: Industry (4), Commerce (6), Culture (5), Army (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Prussia
Tier: Future Nazi
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, jingoism)
Population: 16.799 m.
Economy: £ 18,665 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 310 m.
Trade: £ 1,555 m. (30% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Adequate (2/5)
Administration: Adequate (4/5)
Education: Good (1/5)
Income: £ 1,307 m. (18% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 1,665 m. (£ 358 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ 233 m.
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: Minimal (1/5)
Army quality: Good (0/5)
50 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Poor (0/5)
No ships of the line
No frigates
Manpower: 0.170 m.
Technology: Industry (6), Commerce (5), Culture (6), Army* (6), Navy (5)
Player:

Austria
Tier: Little Country in the Alps
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, pro-military)
Population: 31.583 m.
Economy: £ 30,734 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 281 m.
Trade: £ 2,561 m. (25% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Poor (3/5)
Administration: Poor (2/5)
Education: Poor (1/5)
Income: £ 1,565 m. (19% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 1,260 m. (£ 305 m. surplus)
Treasury: £ -384 m. (4.40% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (2/5)
33 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Poor (0/5)
No ships of the line
No frigates
Manpower: 0.292 m.
Technology: Industry (5), Commerce (5), Culture (5), Army* (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Sardinia
Tier: Pasta Power
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Reactionry (protectionism, state capitalism, pro-military)
Population: 5.093 m.
Economy: £ 6,398 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 55 m.
Trade: £ 533 m. (32% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Adequate (0/5)
Administration: Adequate (0/5)
Education: Adequate (0/5)
Income: £ 400 m. (19% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 474 m. (£ 74 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -1,152 m. (4.28% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
11 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Adequate (0/5)
No ships of the line
4 frigates
Manpower: 0.018 m.
Technology: Industry (4), Commerce (5), Culture (5), Army* (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Sweden
Tier: Stinky Fish Power
Government: Constitutional Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, state capitalism, jingoism)
Population: 3.042 m.
Economy: £ 2,777 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 17 m.
Trade: £ 231 m. (35% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Adequate (0/5)
Administration: Adequate (4/5)
Education: Good (3/5)
Income: £ 217 m. (20% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 288 m. (£ 71 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -222 m. (4.15% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
10 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Adequate (2/5)
4 ships of the line
4 frigates
Manpower: 0.000 m.
Technology: Industry* (4), Commerce (5), Culture (5), Army (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Spain
Tier: Most Former Glorious Power
Government: Constitutional Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, pro-military)
Population: 13.571 m.
Economy: £ 14,182 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 87 m.
Trade: £ 1,182 m. (38% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Poor (3/5)
Administration: Poor (2/5)
Education: Poor (0/5)
Income: £ 691 m. (17% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 890 m. (£ 199 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -6,382 m. (4.40% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
20 regular regiments
No irregulars
Navy quality: Adequate (2/5)
3 ships of the line
5 frigates
Manpower: 0.081 m.
Technology: Industry (4), Commerce (5), Culture (5), Army (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Russia
Tier: Drunk Power
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, jingoism)
Population: 60.043 m.
Economy: £ 45,680 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 167 m.
Trade: £ 2,436 m. (45% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Poor (0/5)
Administration: Poor (0/5)
Education: Minimal (4/5)
Income: £ 1,535 m. (16% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 2,398 m. (£ 863 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -11,420 m. (4.54% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Good (0/5)
57 regular regiments
30 irregular units
Navy quality: Good (0/5)
47 ships of the line
26 frigates
Manpower: 0.647 m.
Technology: Industry (4), Commerce (4), Culture* (5), Army (5), Navy (5)
Player:

Ottomans
Tier: Kebab Power
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Reactionary (protectionism, state capitalism, jingoism)
Population: 19.223 m.
Economy: £ 12,642 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 17 m.
Trade: £ 506 m. (39% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Poor (1/5)
Administration: Poor (1/5)
Education: Poor (0/5)
Income: £ 363 m. (15% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 929 m. (£ 566 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -4,425 m. (4.57% interest)
Plurality: 0.25
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Poor (3/5)
25 regular regiments
60 irregular units
Navy quality: Poor (2/5)
12 ships of the line
10 frigates
Manpower: 0.000 m.
Technology: Industry (2), Commerce (3), Culture (3), Army* (4), Navy (2)
Player:

Egypt
Tier: Sand Power
Government: Absolute Monarchy
Ideology: Conservative (protectionism, interventionism, pro-military)
Population: 11.980 m.
Economy: £ 7,314 m. (expansion)
Industry: £ 7 m.
Trade: £ 256 m. (35% tariffs)
Infrastructure: Minimal (4/5)
Administration: Poor (2/5)
Education: Minimal (3/5)
Income: £ 222 m. (15% average taxes)
Expenses: £ 256 m. (£ 34 m. deficit)
Treasury: £ -91 m. (4.53% interest)
Plurality: 0.05
Militancy: 1.00
Social reforms: None
Army quality: Adequate (0/5)
20 regular regiments
12 irregular units
Navy quality: Poor (3/5)
5 ships of the line
10 frigates
Manpower: 0.042 m.
Technology: Industry (2), Commerce (3), Culture (3), Army (5), Navy (3)
Player:


NOTES ON STATS:

It is important that players and GMs are on the same page regarding stats. To this end I will provide a brief explanation of what the stats mean and how they fit together.

Players are expected to role play their country. A Britain that is led by an anti-military Whig cabinet may not invade Somalia without a reason, while a jingoist Prussia may get away with it. In countries with elections governments change at election time, while in absolute monarchies and other similar countries it is up to the ruler to replace a government with a different one if the current one is not to his or her liking. Government attitudes towards trade, the economy, and the military have a small impact on stats as well, but mostly serve to guide and constrain what players can do.

Infrastructure and industrial technology combine together to determine how much industry there is in a country. You need both to run an industrial country. This means early on industry will be small since nobody has high industrial technology. The more industrial a country is the faster its economy grows, so it is up to you to decide if the small boost you get from keeping infrastructure high in the beginning is worth it in the long run.

Administration and commerce technology combine to determine how effective the government is at doing its job. Again you need both to really have an efficient government, and so you will have to judge when it is worthwhile to start investing in the administration. An efficient government is better at collecting revenue and spends less on its expenses due to lower corruption and higher efficiency. Higher commerce technology also means more trade.

Education, culture technology, and plurality combine to determine technological progress. Every country will get 0-3 new techs per year, though at the beginning most countries will not have high enough education and culture technology to get 3. The number is random, determined by the combination of education and culture technology. Which technology a country gets, if it gets one, is random, though some countries have a focus on one area marked with an asterisk and these technologies are more likely to be the ones chosen. You can of course change the focus. This all means that technological progress will happen even if a player does nothing about it, but you can influence it either directly by ordering a tech researched (short-term), or by supporting education and culture technology (long-term).

Plurality is a measure of how involved the people are in the political process. It is raised by culture technology since the people become more demanding of their governments over the course of the game. It is lowered by political freedoms (such as switching from an absolute to a constitutional regime) and by social reforms that provide what the people want. If plurality is high and people have no say in the government it will lead to high militancy, though other things like nationalism can lead to it as well.

Army quality and army technology and same for navy determine how good the army and navy are at fighting. Manpower is a measure of how many more men the army and navy could accommodate without running into logistical problems. It starts low as most European militaries were small in the immediate post-Napoleonic period. Higher army quality and higher army tech will lead to much larger numbers for manpower as the doctrines change.

A note of caution: infrastructure, administration, education, social reforms, army and navy quality all have ongoing costs. It may not be the best idea for a small and poor country to try to reach a high level of infrastructure unless industrialization is really the focus of the entire plan. No country can afford the best quality of everything, so you will have to pick and choose and prioritize.

Most important of all: have fun!
 
Last edited:
GM: 1835 update posted. You may now post in-character statements. The order deadline for 1836 is 11:59 PM EST on Sunday, November 2nd.
 


Regno di Sardegna

FERT FERT FERT
Inno Sardo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGKqd65hpPQ

Considering the needs of the Sardinian military, the desire and want of a mobile force for the use of skirmishing, screening, and the like, whilst also considering the budgetary status of the Kingdom, His Majesty Carlo Alberto, hereby commissions General Alessandro la Marmora to establish three battalions of marksmen to fulfil such a role for the Kingdom of Sardinia. General la Marmora, entrusted as he is with this task, is expected to present these bersaglieri before His Majesty before the year’s end.

His Majesty, seeing the advantages of the railroad, particularly notable in the United Kingdom, commissions the development of such a railway connecting the capital in Turin to the port city of Genoa, with the hope of completing such a line in the safest and fasted ways possible. Furthermore, His Majesty continues to believe that this policy of industrialisation, for the good of the Italian people, will continue to propel the Kingdom of Sardinia forward and with it, the ideal of Italian union; to this end, in the following years, His Majesty has made it clear to all industrialists living in Italy that the Kingdom of Sardinia, the most advanced, liberal, and free of the Italian states, will provide for you the provisions and support necessary to further advance the cause of progress and union.
 
Last edited:
500px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png

The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland


THE Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland seeks, at a time concurrent with the present, to continue the progress made towards the abolition of Slavery. The vial institution has since been abolished within the borders of the United Kingdom due to the Slavery Abolition Act 1833. The recent treaties in previous months conducted between the Kingdom of France and the Kingdom of Denmark, which actively seek the abolition of the slave trade, have been considered hallmarks of the progress that the United Kingdom now commits herself fully towards.

It remains then, that Portugal, a firm ally of the United Kingdom, and to whom is party to the 1818 Treaty between the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Portugal, still has the remnants of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. We seek and are hopeful that the Kingdom of Portugal shall remain upon the designated time period, within the course of the Year of Our Lord Eighteen Hundred and Thirty Six, to finalise the destruction of this evil system. We look towards the Treaty with the Kingdom of Spain in the recent months as inspiration for any future agreement between the United Kingdom and Portugal upon this issue. With the Right of Search having been granted by the Government of the Kingdom of Spain, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland requests that the same right be conceded by the Kingdom of Portugal in order to fulfill the obligations taken up in the 1818 Treaty.

In concluding this communique, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland is open to seeking mutual agreement with both European and American nations over the issues still remaining in the Slave Trade. The United Kingdom seeks the same out of these nations as many have already conceded to it; the Right of Search being foremost of these requests. This goal is a shining example of the high and righteous intentions set forth by this Government, which has only been affirmed by the actions of other governments. It is with the utmost urgency that this country shall accept new agreements, and we shall never cease until our goal has been fulfilled.

 
tSEP1Hp.png


إيالة مصر
Egypt Eyalet


Diplomatic tour

I have the honour to head a delegation that will raise awareness for the Egyptian situation and for its ruler's numerous qualities among Europe. I have been tasked by the honourable Muhammad Ali to bring the words to Europe that on the other side of the Mediterranean Egypt wakes from its slumber. Egypt is arguably the birthplace of all civilization and we are rising as a modern and civilized land.

The economic situation in Egypt drastically improved over the past few years, under the benevolent and wise leadership of Muhammad Ali, and economic and diplomatic opportunities are plenty. Egypt and Europe can only benefit if they get closer together, and if our cotton can be used by the mighty British enterprises or by the French whom we feel close to, it would be a pleasure for us.

Lastly, daring and gifted individuals are welcome to Egypt, to help it modernize all over the board. We wish to enter talks with france for a broader partnership, but each and every adventuring European who has competences that could benefit Egypt is welcome and shall find out that the great Muhammad Ali knows how to reward his servants.

Boghos Bey Yusufian, on behalf on Muhammad Ali, for Egypt
 
Last edited:
320px-Flag_of_France.svg.png

Royaume de France
Kingdom of France

The Kingdom of France is fully supportive of the efforts of His Britannic Majesty to end the barbaric practices undertaken by merchants between Africa and the Americas. As such His Majesty has ordered the Marine Royale to undertake operations to assist in ending the practice on French ships in cooperation with the Royal Navy. In addition to these measures the Kingdom of France believes that continued cooperation with Britain is necessary to address the continued troubles in the Ottoman Empire which threaten the stability of the Balkans, Black Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean in addition to the continuing Belgian question.

As regards the recent announcement from Nubar Pasha His Majesty has expressed his firm interest in continued ties with Egypt and would be honored to welcome the representative of Muhammed Ali to the Kingdom of France in order to continue discussions on Franco-Egyptian ties and continued trade and military assistance between our two lands. In similar matters His Majesty encourages both the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to quickly and peacefully resolve their dispute over Dutch recognition of the Kingdom of Belgium so that peace may return to the Low Countries.

~His Excellency, Victor de Broglie, Duc de Broglie and Prime Minister of the Kingdom of France acting on behalf of His Majesty, Louis-Philippe I, King of the French
 
500px-Union_Jack_of_Sweden_and_Norway_%281844-1905%29.svg.png

Förenade konungarikena Sverige och Norge
De forenede Kongeriger Norge og Sverige
United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway

It is to our utmost shame that we admit the true nature of the state of affairs of this Union. No honeyed words or eloquent promises can soften the damage to our pride that our negligence has forced the people of Sweden and Norway to undertake, for a review of the Union's development during the past years of my reign has brought to my attention that the Union is stagnant in all sectors. The subjects of Sweden are now disdainful of new technologies and are content to just live their lives as they always have been, having no taste for ambition or ingenuity almost akin to the very cows that we slaughter each day for our food. Shall we simply be content with living like animals or plants?

Our Swedish subjects, tell me, what happened to Sweden's glorious ingenuity? Were it not Swedish armies that all of Northern Europe were in awe of even though they was outnumbered massively by our rivals? Despite what others may state, our successes then were not caused by sticking with our traditions and old administrative systems. No, our success was bought by Swedish inventiveness and our creativity. Was it not reforms to our drafting system that allowed us to effectively reinforce our armies? Now Sweden is content to wallow in its own outdated laurels, but this cannot continue. We are shaming those who fought for Swedish dominance of the Baltic through our current actions. Will you allow Sweden to sink into obscurity and lose our status as the premier power of Scandinavia? I shall pray that you do not.

As for our Norwegian subjects, what say you about the current state of the Kingdom of Norway? Was it not your ancestors who courageously sailed west and founded the first European colonies in the Americas? Was it not your Viking ancestors who were feared across all of Europe for their martial abilities? Did the Norse not conquer as far south as the hinterlands of Southern Italy? Were they not the terror of Northern Europe? Do you not feel the need to reclaim your former glory? Are you seeking to allow yourself to aid in the process of entering Norway into the annals of obscurity?

For those of you who do wish to reclaim the glory that Sweden and Norway once possessed, then all of us must do so as brothers! Sweden by itself cannot reclaim its prestige, and such is also true for the people of Norway! The path to reclamation must be walked with Swedes and Norwegians marching side-by-side. Soon, the names of Swedish and Norwegian inventions and products shall be know all over the world. Starting this very day, we walk forward, not as master and servant, but as comrades, brethren, and compatriots! March unto the future, unrelentingly, my people!

Folkets kärlek min belöning.

320px-Autograf%2C_Carl_Johan%2C_Nordisk_familjebok.png
 
Last edited:
LYehzc4.png

Royaume de Belgique
"L'union fait la force"

I want to express that I share the same desire as our French neighbors a wish to end the bloodshed and that the Dutch King, William I, buries the battleaxe and acknowledges the sovereignty of the Belgian Kingdom as was discussed six years ago. As King of the Belgians, my responsibility is to do what is the best for the people living under the Belgian state, however I can not accomplish my task without the cooperation of His Majesty of the United Kingdom of Netherlands. Do not turn a blind eye for my people's pleas for independence yet again and drag this struggle on for several more years.


Signed by Léopold Georges Chrétien Frédéric of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, His Majesty The King of the Belgians
Wh7rSoI.png
 
500px-Flag_of_the_Habsburg_Monarchy.svg.png

Kaiserthum Österreich
Austrian Empire​

It is good to see that peace continues to reign supreme in Europe following the new order established by the Congress of Vienna and it is our hope that we shall see the maintaining of this splendid trend far into the bright future. We are most pleased with the early reign of Kaiser Ferdinand I and have high expectations for his future achievements, where we imagine that stability and order will be guaranteed through the wise and understanding nature of His Imperial Royal Apostolic Majesty. With a watchful eye, we look to the east and south unto the Ottoman Empire and its recent troubles as a source of worry, yet we are confident that the wise leaders of Europe will be able to steer this region closer to the long-term security that we prefer and have grown accustomed to.

In the Empire of Austria and all of its Kingdoms we wish to see steady progress forward, without allowing overly enthusiastic elements to perform drastic and dangerous changes that could harm the lives of people. We shall not be enchanted by enticing but hollow promises of unprecedented wealth, because we know that wealth only comes from hard and honest labour. There are no shortcuts to prosperity, and the proper way for the state to help is to relieve the farmers, craftsmen and aristocrats of these lands from unexpected upheavals and economic instability to aid long-term growth. Our experience tells us that responsible policies will ensure an unwavering growth over time and we are convinced that the core population agree with this sentiment.

We also hope to see the German Confederation prosper and bloom together with the Austrian Empire, as we believe that greater cooperation with our fellow Germans will be another sagacious step towards strength and security. Through unity we shall be able to clear out disputes with fair settlements that leave all sides content and avoid further complications. For example, we believe that the Zollverein adequately solves some inherent problems in the German Confederation and over time we look forward to further Austrian integration into this organisation, in such a way as to not endanger the Austrian farmer's livelihood.

His Serene Highness, Prince Klemens Wenzel von Metternich, State Chancellor of the Austrian Empire​
 
320px-Flag_of_the_Ottoman_Empire_%281517-1844%29.svg.png

Ottoman Empire
Devlet-i ʿAliyye-yi ʿOsmâniyye

Our Empire is destined by the Will of Allah and the guidance of Our Sultan to continue along the path of Progress to modernize and revitalize the Ottoman State; Our future lies in the restructuring and reforming of Ottoman bureaucracy, law, and administration. With wisdom, His Imperial Majesty embarks upon the righteous duty of restoring Ottoman power through internal means, creating a foundation strong enough from which the Empire may stand high alongside the Powers of Europe. This noble ambition lies within the very heart of His Imperial Majesty as he pledges to embrace such a goal of reformation within the coming years, for the betterment of every Ottoman subject.

This desire for stability seems to mirror that of the European Powers that look towards the Ottoman Empire with wary eye. This must be addressed: It is with understanding that His Imperial Majesty concurs with the Powers of Europe, wishing peace and prosperity to reign supreme within the Empire. The integrity of the Ottoman Empire is one of paramount importance, for it is We who find Ourselves an integral crossroad between Europe, Asia, and Africa, it is We who find Ourselves home to a multitude of peoples, and it is We who find Ourselves hosting peoples of various faiths, beliefs, and cultures. Yet they are all subjects of the House of Osman, and as such, His Imperial Majesty pledges to defend and uphold the safety of the various peoples of the Empire, from Christians to Muslims. This, Our Sultan promises to the Powers of Europe as he pledges to address the status of all Ottoman subjects within the upcoming years.

Thusly, His Imperial Majesty opens his arms to the Powers of Europe, to embrace as kindred spirits and affirm cooperation and ensure stability. Many concerns are shared between Our Realms, and much good can be done through working as partners. The government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland has spoken of slavery, and of this concern, Our Sultan shares the same. Through firman, Our Sultan has taken action to free those slaves such as the Greeks and Circassian slave children. We must strive to concentrate on the bonds We share and not the differences We possess.

- Grand Vizier Mehmed Emin Rauf Pasha for Sultan Mahmud II
 
320px-Flag_of_France.svg.png

Royaume de France
Kingdom of France


Speech from the Throne


Delegates of the Assembly! We come before you today to detail the program of the Prime Minister for the following year and present the various projects of the Government for the coming period in order to continue to expand the power of France both at home and abroad. The broad strategy of the government will, as with those that have preceded it, consist of the continued application of the Charter of 1830 and the continued defense of French interests across Europe and, indeed, the world.

Since the Napoleonic Wars the French Military as a whole has seen very little improvement despite the rapid advance of weapons and methods, both on land and at sea. As such, following advice from various high-ranking military officers, including the Duc de Dalmatie, the Minister of Marine Admiral Duperré and the Minister of War, Marquis Maison, We and the Prime Minister have both agreed on the necessity of an improvement in training and equipment for both branches of the French Military to ensure France may continue to project her strength across Europe and ensure that she may protect herself against all foreign threats.

While we must safeguard and increase our military strength we must also grow the economy in order to ensure France remains a force on the World Stage, as such it has been deemed necessary to begin the construction of rail connections between Paris and the major mining areas around Lille and Nancy as well as the major cities of Lyon and the vital port of Marseille. In addition we will encourage private development of such railroads as well as continued expansion of mining across the North and East of France. This combined effort will further increase economic growth throughout France for the benefit of all Frenchmen.

In Algeria it has been decided that General Bugeaud will be sent with additional reinforcements to reinforce the current army in the area with orders to destroy the revolt led by Abdul Kader. Land will also be granted to those Frenchmen who would wish to cross the Mediterranean and begin working the fertile lands of Algeria so the poor and miserable of France may create for themselves a new life on the other side of the sea. With support from our glorious arms these men and women will bring civilization to a harsh and uncivilized land which is now a part of the Kingdom of France.

The continued troubles between Muhammed Ali Pasha in Egypt and the Ottoman Empire remains of particular concern to the Kingdom of France and Admiral Roussin has been dispatched to the Eastern Mediterranean with a portion of the Mediterranean Fleet to continue to monitor the situation and ensure French nationals and interests are respected. Talks will also continue with Nubar Pasha, representative of the Wali of Egypt in order to promote continued trade with Egypt and open new opportunities for French merchants throughout the Eastern Mediterranean.

Closer to home the continued disagreement between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of the Netherlands remains concerning and France will give it's full diplomatic support to the Kingdom of Belgium in order to assist in securing Dutch recognition of the Kingdom's independence. In addition France pledges that, in the event of a Dutch invasion, French troops will march north and assist the Belgian forces in defending their hard won independence. To the south the continued instability in the Kingdom of Spain remains of concern to France and as such an Army of Observation will be formed under the command of Jean-de-Dieu Soult, Duc de Dalmatie and Marshal of France with orders to observe the events across the Pyrenées and prevent any side in the conflict from entering French territory. The Kingdom of France will however offer full diplomatic support to Her Majesty Queen Isabella II with the possibility of further assistance being considered.

The combined effect of these various projects will reinforce the strength and wealth of France and ensure the complete defence of French interests in Northern Europe and the Mediterranean region. This will allow the Kingdom of France to continue to project it's strength and ensure that the French people will remain prosperous and powerful well into the future.

~His Majesty, Louis Philippe I, King of the French
 
Speech from the Throne by King William

445px-William_I_of_the_Netherlands.jpg


Noble and Mighty Lords!

After overlooking the time passed since Thine youngest session, I count it as a special privilege to open this assembly with the recognition that once again many blessings have poured over the fatherland.

The birth of a Prince to my beloved second son has filled My House and Relations with joy. My relations with the foreign powers progress on the same foot of friendship.

The permanent care, steered by Myself, to ensure the reasonable, fair and careful handling of all issues in our foreign affairs have given fruit.

It remains out of my reach to realise a permanent deal in the case of Belgium. It is difficult to say how much the attitude of some parts of Europe have contributed to this. From the announcements which, for my part, shall be brought to Thine Assembly, Thy Noble, Mighty Lords shall know that I shall remain actively seized on this issue, which weighs itself heavily with the well-being of The Netherlands.

Internal governance is working as scheduled.

The sea and landforces still respond adequately to her tasks.

It is a pleasure for me to inform Thy Noble, Mighty Lords that the orders have been given to dismiss the National Militia's draft of 1827, as well as the indefinite furlough of both the ordinary and extraordinary drafts of 1831.

Through the general competition and efforts in many branches of our industries, it is encouraging to say that the Netherlands progresses. Trade and shipping increase. Our factories develop and this keeps confirming itself more and more.

Through the improvements of prices of some produce and the bountiful harvest of others, there is also a more profitable return for our agriculture.

The state of our fisheries is satisfactory.

Satisfying are, in general, the outcomes of the different parts of national education. The arts and sciences are diligently practiced.

For the dykes and sea defenses the last year was not unfortunate. The improvement of canals and roads remains object to attention.

In our overseas possessions calm and good order reign. Measures taken in response to earlier breaches of calm on Sumatra promise good result.

The new internal divisions that have been put into service in the Netherlands Indies continue to have the desired effects.

The Realm's monetary assets keep answering to the foresights, given to Thy Noble, Mighty Lords beforehand. The openings, which for my part shall be done in this session, can provide evidence that the public trust, the possession of which we enjoy, is founded on close principles.

Current income clearly dovers the expensis and puts me in a state to, in spite of the state in which we, as a result of the Belgian uprising, continue to live in, lower the burden of my beloved subjects step by step.

The laws of the budget, to be presented to Thy Noble, Mighty Lords, shall see to it, that no new measures need to be taken, but that on the contrary they taxes can be lowered. I find the hope that the time nears in which regular income shall be enough to see to the regular needs of the realm.

The Commission of the Redaction of Dutch Legislation arduously continues the revision of the Book of Civil Law. The designs of the laws, relative to that revision, shall probably be presented to the considerations of Thy Noble, Mighty Lords in time.

After the ascertainment of that Book of Law and of a law for temporary complement to the provisions surrounding the single, criminal bankruptcy shall, all established parts of Dutch legislation be able to be implemented; as measures have been taken to complete them through a Penal Code.

Noble, Mighty Lords! The Providence of the Netherlands strengthens the consciousness of duty, and calls for a grateful use of it and to, under the watch of the Almighty, with the use of all strength, to confirm and solidify it. And to this, I count on your cooperation. Reciprocally they trust the soul of our national consultationand the salvation of our beloved Fatherland; the subject of our labour!
 
Bandera-de-Espa%25C3%25B1a-Carlos-III.png



REINO DE ESPAÑA



People of Spain! I will not deny that our country is living harsh times. The Carlist insurrection, that seeks to divide our people and to negate the decision of the Spanish Parliament, has ravaged our country all over, but our will to defeat those who poison their brothers with foul and reactionary words will end soon. Our recent victory in Bilbao has relieved such city from the siege of the enemy, and it is only the first step to the defeat of the rebels and the recovery of our country.

Likely, there are lot of discussions about the need to re-enact the 1812 Constitution, but I call both Moderados and Progresistas to join the Crown in a new constitutional pact, that will find common positions so all Spanish are represented in this text. Together, we will show the unity of our people, and our country will be able to move forward from this darl times.

PLUS ULTRA​

Isabel II por la Gracia de Dios, Reina de Castilla, de León, de Aragón, de las Dos Sicilias, de Jerusalén, de Navarra, de Granada, de Toledo, de Valencia, de Galicia, de Mallorca, de Sevilla, de Cerdeña, de Córdoba, de Córcega, de Murcia, de Menorca, de Jaén, de los Algarbes, de Algeciras, de Gibraltar, de las Islas Canarias, de las Indias Orientales y Occidentales, Islas y Tierra firme del mar Océano; Archiduquesa de Austria; Duquesa de Borgoña, de Brabante y de Milan; Condesa de Aspurg, Flandes, Tirol y Barcelona; Señora de Vizcaya y de Molina
 
320px-Flag_of_France.svg.png
320px-Flag_of_Muhammad_Ali.svg.png

Treaty of Alexandria


Article I: Trade and Economic Agreements


I. The Wali of Egypt will make efforts to decrease the price of trading with the Province of Egypt for merchants of the Kingdom of France by lowering custom duties and decreasing the time required to secure entry for French goods into Egypt.
II. The Kingdom of France will make efforts to decrease the price of trading with the Kingdom of France for Egyptian merchants by lowering custom duties and decreasing the time required to secure entry for Egyptian goods into France.
III. The Kingdom of France will allow the Wali of Egypt to open a Consulate in Paris to encourage skilled Frenchmen to travel to Egypt and assist in improving the Egyptian economy.
IV. The Wali of Egypt will allow the Kingdom of France to open a Consulate in Cairo to represent French interests in Egypt.

Article II: Military Cooperation and Support


I. The Kingdom of France will send a delegation of French military officers headed by General Horace Sébastiani to Egypt to assist in training the Egyptian Army and it's Officer Corps.
II. The Kingdom of France will send shipments of weapons and ammunition including artillery pieces to Egypt in order to assist in arming and equipping the Egyptian Army in addition to other supplies for the Egyptian military.

[X] His Excellency Louis-Mathieu Molé, Foreign Minister of the Kingdom of France acting on behalf of His Majesty, Louis-Philippe I, King of the French

[X] Boghos Bey Yusufian, on behalf on Muhammad Ali, for Egypt
 
Last edited:
tSEP1Hp.png


إيالة مصر
Egypt Eyalet


Treaty of Alexandria

Egypt and France share tight bonds as the wise Bonaparte freed us from the Mamluk yoke and enabled our beloved Muhammad Ali to rule and to take us from the pits of despair centuries of Ottoman domination had let us in, to prosperity and might. Muhammad Ali is the man who benefited Egypt the most since Salah ad-Din, and just like him he enabled Egypt and Shams to be united. Frenchmen, it is an incomparable pleasure to serve under such a benevolent ruler, and I believe you also knew this felicity when the armies of the Emperor flew the Tricolore on every corner of Europe. Your King will certainly maintain France's rank and power and cooperation between Egypt and France will make us all stronger.

The Wali has seen fit to gift you with certain treasures found in our country, as a proof of our strong friendship and of the culture of Egypt. I would be delighted if you could learn more about our past, and find interest in our future. The French can taste the delightful fruit of liberty but Egypt is only free because of Muhammad Ali and if we want to ensure his legacy is lasting, changes will have to occur. I know we will be able to count on French support when the time comes, and I thank you for that.

The Consulate and myself will organize exhibitions to show you the gifts we brought; and we will also try to motivate daring Frenchmen who desire to come to Egypt to help us modernize this beautiful country.

Vive l'Egypte et vive la France!

Boghos Bey Yusufian, on behalf on Muhammad Ali, for Egypt


[X] Treaty
 
225px-Flag_of_Russia.svg.png

It has been years since our great triumph over the destructive forces of Napoleon. The Russian Empire continues to stand tall in the world as a beacon of order and stability. We will be sure that we continue the role required of us as guardians of orders alongside those of our friends and allies to keep down the radical forces that sought to plunge the world into decades of war and decay. Regarding the recent treaty between the French and the Egyptians, this seems a potential hazard and concern. The Egyptians have proven recently to be very aggressive and potentially radical. The situation must be monitored to see how far it goes.



Nicholas I ~ Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias
 
NOTE: Stats are up. Colonial stats are not yet done, though this should affect most countries only in a minor way. The exceptions are the UK, which has a large colonial empire to finance, the Netherlands which makes a lot of money from the DEI which is not yet shown, and France which has a large army in North Africa that is not yet accounted for.

For this first turn, and this turn only, all of you are invited to include a note with your orders about any historical mistakes in the stats. For example, if Sweden is actually ruled by free trade liberals at this time while I have it down as protectionist conservatives this is the chance to let me know. After this turn any mistakes are permanent.

Also, any of you with Constitutional Monarchies have to include a note in your orders for how often elections happen in your country and when the next ones are due. In the case of the UK, for example, if I remember right it is every six years at this time, but elections can be called early.

Cheers and good luck.