• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
DgYF75L.png


Deutsches Reich - Reichsmarine
German Reich - Reichsmarine

Deutschlandlied

Reduction of the fleet size in accordance with the Treaty of Versailles

The Reichsmarine, as per the Treaty of Versailles, has to reduce its capacities. In order to fight the current deficit and respecting our legal obligations, I hereby announce that two battleships, eight light cruisers, forty-two destroyers, fifty torpedo boasts and the remnants of our submarine fleet will be sent to the Portsmouth Royal Dockyard.

The remaining ships that the Reichsmarine needs to part with in order to meet its quotas will be sold. The Kingdom of Sweden shall acquire four light cruisers and twenty destroyers, the Argentine republic shall acquire ten destroyers, and the Empire of Japan shall acquire seven light cruisers and thirty-six destroyers. These nations shall respectively pay 1264 million dollars, 360 million dollars and 2248 million dollars.

[X] Sweden
[X] Argentina
[X] Japan

These cuts should enable the German government to reduce the ongoing deficit and to meet its treaty obligations.

Adolf von Trotha, Oberbefehlshaber der Reichsmarine
Dem Deutschen Volke


((Using stats dollars, of course))
 
Last edited:
[X] For the Kingdom of Sweden, Johannes Hellner, Minister for Foreign Affairs.

The Kingdom of Sweden will continue to recognise Mátyás III as King of Hungary.
 
Last edited:
OOC: Shynka taking his role seriously? Truly these are the end times (I approve though).

Working, slowly and surely, on a mobile IC on recent Bulgarian history. I'll get it out by tomorrow.
 
[x] Hipolito Yrigoyen, Presidented dela Republica Argentina
 
jtcP0rU.png



Citizens of the Argentine republic, the year 1919 was a year that will live in infamy. The Anarchist revolution and then the repression of it which admittedly went out of hand, will forever remain as a stain of what i have hoped to achieve, and of our history but we must continue to walk forward.


This year your government will beginning the long planned and awaited primary education reform in the biggest cities of Argentina. This will be done by building more schools to help our overwhelmed institutions and the creation of a new curriculum for the children, reflecting the modern realities of our nation. In the upcoming years the program will be expanded to the rural areas and secondary level of education for our children are the future of our beloved nation and education the way for them to achieve the destiny of our republic!.

A double approach project to follow in the footsteps of the founders of the modern argentina, the generation of the 80’s, will start to be enacted from this year on. We must continue with the idea that for our nation to be strong and a modern republic, industrialization is a must. To obtain this goal the government will support the private sector on this endeavour of national interest. With this in mind the state will begin offering tax breaks and loans for the continue grow of the heavy goods industry in our country and the increased production of agricultural tools and tractors locally. This will fuel a reduction of cost in agriculture production and development, helping our priced agricultural sector and at the same time continue our path to modernity and development.

With this i leave you fellow Argentines, your government is working for Argentina to achieve its destiny in the stars, work hard for your dreams, for this is the era of the Argentine Dream!

Presidente : Hipólito Yrigoyen



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The Argentine Republic express its deeply concern for the situation which has developed in the european continent. Millions have died in the great war and yet only a few years after its end, new conflicts threaten to arise and engulf the world once more on death, fire and blood.

We in the Argentine Republic are increasingly disturbed by the action of the french government upon the german soil. We understand the terror that anarchists and communist revolts brings BUT the german state was more than capable of ending it. The blatant breach of the Versailles agreement and the sovereignty of the defeated nation is unacceptable. For this we must condemn the french government other nations which has expressed same thoughts.

With respect of the blatant illegal occupation of hungary by the Romanian kingdom and their continue pressure for extra demands upon the Kingdom of Hungary, we express utmost distate as such demands have come after the treaty of trianon was signed. This show us and the world that the Kingdom of Romania has no intention of behaving like its civilized peers, and its willing to use arms to get what they want from a defeated and crumbling nation. The demands of the abdication and the illegal arrest of admiral Horthy by romanian forces will not be accepted by the republic of Argentina and as such we continue recognizing Mátyás III and Miklos Horthy as the leaders of the Hungarian Kingdom and its people. The actions of the Romanian Kingdom are a stain upon the world and we hope the League of Nations will soon enter in action.

Presidente de La República Argentina: Hipólito Yrigoyen
 
Last edited:
Poincare_larger.jpg

On the Success of the Ruhr Campaign and other Foreign Affairs​

Given the complete annihilation of all Bolshevik forces, unity, leadership and support in Germany, the French Government must call this campaign a unmitigated success. As such, the French Government keeps to it's word and returns it's forces from the Ruhr Valley to the zone defined by the Treaty of Versailles as the French Occupational Zone.

The destruction of the red threat is a victory for all of Europe. A cancer born in Russia, all of the pieces must be destroyed to found a free world in which to build true democracies on. I wish to congratulate all French soldiers who participated in the campaign.

We have high hopes that the British will continue cooperation concerning both the necessary reparations from the German Government and the fate of the Ottoman Empire.


 

432px-Coat_of_arms_of_the_Russian_Federation_%281992-1993%29.svg.png

The Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic

Once again there are many issues that must addressed and bourgeois lies correct. In particular, I must address the situations regarding the War with Poland, Hungary, Germany, Japan, and clarify our relations with the Baltic States and Finland.

First, I shall address the War with Poland. Unfortunately many have fallen for the lies of this Polish Scum. It was not RSFSR that began the border dispute that resulted in this war, nor the RSFSR that has continuously expanded the scope of this war, but it was the Poles themselves. Furthermore, the very oppressor of the worker is claiming that the RSFSR, a state governed by the worker, seeks to harm the worker whilst its own workers toil to feed the desires and egos of their leaders. However, as a sign of the peaceful intentions of the RSFSR, we offer Poland the borders established by the Curzon Line A and that it desist in its attempts to incite rebellion within the RSFSR. Otherwise, the RSFSR shall fight to protect its territory and integrity that the Polish leadership have sought to attack through force of arms.

To-the-Polish-front-1920.jpg

To the Polish Front!

Next I shall turn to the Hungarian situation. The actions of Romania, as well as, the tacit support of France are shockingly naked power grab against a recognized state that had acquiesced to the terms demanded of it following the war. That said treaty means little and that the victorious powers only seek to feast upon the bones of Hungary as a crow feasts upon carrion reveals their true intentions and desire only for the aggrandizement of power.

While in Germany, the proletariat has once come under attack by the bourgeois powers, though it is clear that German actions were motivated by the brutality of the French Regime. It is notable that a nation that claims to espouse democracy so, participates in the brutal subjugation of its fellow “democratic” neighbor. It is these actions that prove why the RSFSR must fight, to secure its independence and freedom for the proletariat. Never shall the people of the RSFSR be subjugated by the murderous bourgeois! And thus we must remain on our guard.

Be-on-Guard.jpg

Be on Guard!

Our agreement with Japan has secured Siberia and the Far East, will allow for some of the final pockets of White resistance to be put down and for the RSFSR to return to peace. We also hope that peaceful relations with our Asiatic will lead to fruitful cooperation in the future.

And lastly on the matter of the Baltic States. We offer Lithuania, another state under attack by the vile Polish, an alliance against this common threat. To the nation of Estonia and Finland, we desire to conclude our armistice with the Treaties of Tartu (1) (2). To Finland we offer the region around Petsamo for the return of Repola and Porajärvi to the RSFSR, along with land access rights through the Petsamo region to Norway, additionally the fortress of Ino and those fortresses of the Finnish Outer Islands are to be disarmed. While Estonia shall be granted independence.

Long Live the Revolution!

~People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs of the RSFSR, Leon Trotsky
 
Sarawak_Royal_Emblem.png

Letter from the White Rajah
To His Royal Majesty Administration

I want to personally make it known to His Majesty that even though this has not been stated in the terms of our Treaty of Protection, but I in my power as the ruler of Sarawak want to emphasis our full support of his Majesty's position in the recent events going on in Europe.

I want to stress how thankful I am to have the United Kingdom of Great Britain to guarantee the sovereignty of this Kingdom in the east, however not many other states have that luxury. As evident, the sovereignty of much more influential and important nations for world stability have had their hands tied to their back and now what has been guaranteed to them in the treaties following the great war is being in danger of becoming a broken promise.

I want to thank and emphasis how grateful I am to have His Royal Majesty and His administration with his wisdom and his empathy for the people suffering in Europe. The line of the White Rajah shall always support the house of Windsor and we have faith in that of His Majesty's actions in the ongoing crises.



Signed by His Higness, Charles Vyner de Windt Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak
nQaETAi.png
 
[X] - Uchida Kosai, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Greater Japanese Empire, on behalf of His Imperial Majesty the Emperor
 
The Soviet spread their own lies and claim we have intentions to take Lithuanian land and perhaps we did before but no longer. While it is not my place to discuss the Eastern Border to Lithuania I will leave that to my Belarusian friends whose western border is the one up for discussion. All I ask of the Lithuanian government is that they respect the rights of Poles living within Lithuania. Do that and hopefully we can be friends. The Soviets offer concessions they know we cannot accept. We made a promise in our reaty with the rightful Ukrainian and Belarusian governments to enter no negotiations with the Soviets without their approval or to accept any deal without their approval. Equaly I will not leave the Polish people of Lvov to endure the tortures of Communist oppression. While the Soviets claim to be governed by the working class it seem odd that their notional leader is a Russian Noble. Why would the so called workers state allow a Noble under the Russian Empire to hold the position of leadership.

In the Rest of Europe we urge Romania to withdraw from Hungary. Why fight your neighbours with the Communist bear on your doorstep. The Hungarians should no longer be your enemy the Bolsheviks should be however.
 
1903Nicholas-09.jpg

To His Excellency István Bethlen, President of the Kingdom of Hungary

I am most honored by the Parliament of the Kingdom of Hungary offering the Crown of St. Stephen to me, one of such a noble and great stature. It is with the greatest of humility that I accept such an offer; it is with a heavy heart that I realize however I would not be welcomed by your people at this time, thus I implore you to appoint a Regent on my behalf and allow him to exercise all my duties and functions, including the appointment of the Palatine of the Kingdom. It is my hope that I may see Budapest soon.

With kind regards,

His Royal Highness,
Nicolae de România​


BPkSNUl.png

Romanian Land Forces
Forţele Terestre Române

To His Excellency István Bethlen, President of the Kingdom of Hungary

With the fulfillment of our demands and relations between our two nations stabilizing in some form it is my pleasure to announce that it has been decided that the Romanian Land Forces in the Kingdom of Hungary will no longer be leaving in March of 1921, rather we will be withdrawing over the next few weeks, with the hopes that we shall fully be out of your territory within the month. Further, our forces have been instructed to hand out food and supply parcels to your people, as a means of repaying for what we had acquired during out stay. It is our hope that relations between our nations will continue to improve and that the scars, however deep they may be, will be healed with time, effort and care.

With regards,

250px-IoanRascanu.jpg


General Ioan Rășcanu,
Minister of War
on behalf of
Ferdinand I, King of the Romanians​
 
The Government of the Grand National Assembly continues to recognise Mátyás III as the legitimate Head of State of Hungary, with Admiral Miklós Horthy as his Palatine. As such, the Government of the Grand National Assembly will not strive towards establishing and strengthening diplomatic ties with Romania and their puppets that occupy Budapest. We call on the world to join us, beleaguered as we may be, in condemning Bucharest's vicious acts against a virtually defenceless nation and join our call to restore King Mátyás and Admiral Horthy to their rightful positions.

-Bekir Sami Kunduh, Foreign Minister.
 
gr-1828.gif
The Greek Kingdom wishes to condemn the nation of Romania and its actions in Hungary. Not only have they completly ravaged Hungary even after signing the treaty of Trianon, but they also now wish to establish a puppet monarch. As such, not only do we refuse to recognise the current king, Nicolae of Romania, but we also wish to make it known that the Greek Government, under the guidance both of King Alexander I and the Greek Parliament, recognises Mátyás III as King of Hungary and Miklos Horthy as Palatine of the Hungarian Kingdom.
 
GM Note: Orders are due TODAY. France, Yugoslavia, Romania, and South Africa do not have their orders in. They have one hour and ten minutes from the time of this post (a total of a one hour extension) before the penalties begin.
 
The Republic under duress:

The 1920 elections


H8bV898.jpg


Following the Kapp Putsch, the Republican leaders had to remain lenient to avoid a civil war. The SPD was moderate but some of the ones that listened to the general strike weren't. The French intervention forced many Germans to set their differences aside to support their government and country but after the crisis ended, not on terms favourable for Germany, that was deeply humiliated, the old disputes only came back stronger. The USPD-SPD fracture ran deep, as the USPD opposed the SPD revisionism and wanted to be uncompromising with the right-wingers who had initiated the putsch and triggered the intervention in the first place. Ebert couldn't punish the right too harshly as he needed the Freikorps in the Ruhr against the workers who had responded to his general strike call. The judiciary decision, that allowed most putschists to walk freely, was one of the measures he had to implement in order to meet the French delays, which was a failure. The various Weimar Coalition parties suffered from the crisis, and it seemed like the old coalition would be difficult to reconduct. The various compromises and betrayals, the Versailles Treaty, the French intervention, all of that made the Weimar parties less popular than before.

The right-wingers who had voted for the moderate parties during the revolution were turning to uncompromising parties, a part of the popular electorate was left unsatisfied with the SPD, and the revolutionary mood that had empowered the moderates seemed to be gone.

The SPD was the main party last time the German people voted, but a fringe of the workers refused to content themselves with the social model of Weimar and wanted more. They would for the USPD mainly, and the more the SPD compromised itself with the the rigjt, the further its electoral base eroded. Ebert and Noske defended their legacy, as they had built a more social state, and the republic. But the French intervention and the way the strike was ended in the Ruhr made the legacy of the SPD harder to defend, even though they could hardly have done better, given the circumstances. They appealed to the moderate working class, and pictured themselves as a force of stability.

The USPD's pacifism, desire to compromise with the French socialists, alienated a part of its electorate, but its leaders hoped to gain votes from old SPD voters that would demand more social rights. The inner dissensions of the USPD, tempted by an union with the KPD and the IIIrd International, weakened it as well, but millions of Germans who had believed in the revolution still hoped the USPD would represent them.

The Zentrum on the other hand, was facing unrest in its homelands of Baavria. The Bavarian party wing had broken away in 1919 over government participation, and it was the first menace the Catholic party was confronted with. Conservative Catholics felt more and more appealed by the real right, and the catholic workers by the USPD. The zentrum, a minority party, remained powerful but faced many threats. Bound to the legacy of the government, desiring to protect all classes and with no clear economic direction, the Zentrum was struggling to keep its electorate united.

The DDP, a liberal party that made the SPD accept the idea of a capitalist state, was challenged by Stressmann's right-wing politicians. Its social-liberal model was the basis of the Weimar state, but it had yet to show its effects an now facing a rival liberal party that was opposing the government's foreign policy, it remained to be seen how many moderates would cast their votes for the DDP.

The DVP was made of monarchist liberals, classical liberals and the ones opposed to he treaty. In favour of clear capitalism, and with contempt for the SPD, the DVP was the liberal alternative, for the middle class that opposed the Treaty, socialism and generally most things related to the French. Its monarchist stance was strong, but the DVP appeared to be willing to enter a government, making a right-wing coalition possible.

The DNVP was a true right-wing party, that was sidelined in 1919 and that hoped to make a comeback. Increasingly antisemitic, authoritarian, monarchist, weary of socialism and capitalism alike, it was the party of those who regreted the days of the Empire, as the party banner clearly showed. Supported by big businness, in favour of a sort of corporatism, backed by the Freikorps, it was the main opposition to the Weimar compromise.

The BVP, the Bavarian Party, was close to the DNVP in terms of policies, but opposed the Prussian Juncker character of the DNVP and was at the forefront of Bavarian particularism. Opposed to the Weimar compromise in particular, to Berlin in particular, it also gave funds to the most extremist movements of Germany, based in Bavaria, such as the NSDAP. A trend towards a more compromising stance was seen among the ranks of the BVp, that had split recently from the Zentrum, but it remained to be seen if this Bavarian nationalism would grow or come to and end.

The last important party was the KPD, but it wasn't expected to grow. Backed by old Spartcists, it was the arm of Moscow in Berlin.
 
Bulgaria, 1913—1920: After the Great War

The Tsardom of Bulgaria came out of the First Balkan War a strong nation; it stretched from Macedonia to the Black Sea and from Southern Dobruja to the Nothern shores of the Aegean. The Bulgarians had defeated the Ottomans, their masters for the better part of about four-hundred years, and had emerged as the strongest of the Southern Balkan nations. Despite this, Tsar Ferdinand I was not satisfied with the concessions to his nation; he also disputed Romanian control of parts of Northern Dobruja alongside the wishes for further territorial gains against the Serbians and Greeks. When war was declared and an offensive launched against the latter two in June 1913, after the signing of the Treaty of London, the Ottomans and Romanians took their chances to enforce their own claims: the former to reclaim their recently lost territory west of Constantinople, and the latter to establish their right to defend their claims to their territory as a sovereign nation. Bulgarian military defeats against their initial enemies led to a weakening of national resolve, and a renewed offensive by the Romanians would bring them dangerously close to the capital of Sofia. The Tsar's government asked for an armistice by late July.*

The subsequent peace talks resulted in the humiliating Treaty of Bucharest of August 10. The terms nearly completely reversed Bulgaria's gains from the First War: she lost her Macedonian possessions to the Serbs, Thessaloniki to the Greeks (though the city was never actually Bulgarian, having been occupied by the Greeks since the end of the First War; this left only Dedeagach as the only port on the Aegean), Edirne to the Ottomans, and Southern Dobruja to the Romanians (which they had controlled since independence in 1878). Bulgarian territorial "gains" were negligible at best.*

Bulgaria's pride and honor wounded, Ferdinand saw the following Balkan disturbances of mid-1914—and the July Crisis thus associated—as a way to once again return to Bulgaria what he perceived as her "rightful lands", particularly Macedonia, Thessaloniki, and Southern Dobruja (the latter two only if Greece and Romania joined in the Balkan Crisis). Despite this, Ferdinand did not wish to jeopardize Bulgaria's position by potentially throwing Greece or Romania into the court of the Allies due to another of Bulgaria's campaigns of expansion. Thus the Tsar declared a strict policy of neutrality. Despite this, both ambassadors from London, St. Petersburg and Paris and from Berlin and Vienna attempted to woo the Tsar and his ministers toward their side with promises of some of Ferdinand's much-wanted territory; this neutrality was further complicated by a secret pact of cooperative defense signed with the Sublime Porte in August of that year. *As the Russian and French diplomats offered to slice off Serbian lands claimed by Bulgaria on the condition that she join the war against Austria-Hungary (and, later on, to maintain neutrality), Serbia defied their allies in St. Petersburg, preferring to fight alone than to give land to the Bulgarians. At the same time, the Austro-Hungarian ambassador offered a significantly larger portion of Southern Serbia to Ferdinand, along with a return of Southern Dobruja and Thessaloniki in the event Romania and Greece joined the Allies. This tug-of-war between the Allies and Central Powers for Bulgaria's commitment to the conflict lasted into the summer of 1915. Though the Allies promised considerable territorial gains—particularly around Thrace and Constantinople, along with possibly the whole of the contested zone in Macedonia—the British and French could not secure the cooperation of the Greeks or Serbs in ceding this newly-acquired, hard-fought-for land. The Austro-Hungarian and German territorial guarantees, however, were far more concrete and readily agreeable, as the Serbs were to be mostly annexed by the Dual Monarchy anyway. This sent the Bulgarian Tsar and his ministers on the road to joining the Central Powers. In August 1915 Ferdinand dispatched a diplomat to the Wilhelmstraß to inquire to the terms and conditions of a military agreement; at the same time the Minister of War resigned and was replaced with a pro-German one. By early September, following several failed French-led conspiracies to keep Bulgaria neutral, Allied pressure finally forced the Serbian foreign minister to accept ceding part of Serbia's Macedonian territory on the condition of Bulgarian neutrality; however, it was too little too late. On September 6 a treaty finalized Bulgaria's entry into the war in support of Germany and her Central Power allies; a secret clause of the treaty guaranteed Bulgaria's claims of Serbian Macedonia and lands East of the Morava, including her claims to Greek and Romanian territory should they join the Allies, thereby guaranteeing a reversal of Bulgaria's losses due to the Treaty of Bucharest.*

The plans called for a joint German-Bulgarian offensive on Serbia in early October; the simultaneous Bulgarian mobilization was surprisingly efficient for having only recently been defeated in the Second Bulkan War, but regardless was not completed in time to attack the Serbs at the same time the Germans and Austro-Hungarians did. Serbian surprise at Bulgarian inactivity due to continued mobilization—mistaken for unpreparedness and disorganization amongst the Army staff—meant the Serbs could redeploy much needed troops from the Bulgarian border North. When the Bulgarians finally attacked on October 21,*they bore down on Macedonia with over 300,000 men. Initial Bulgarian attacks were great successes, pushing the outnumbered Serbs West while the Germans pushed South to link their lines together. This was achieved on November 5.*With the Serbian Army in supreme disorder, the Bulgarian high command decided to requisition troops to deal with the new French and British presence just North of Thessaloniki. Following battles where Bulgarian scouting units defeated French and British rear guards, the four Allied divisions (three French and one British) retreated to Thessaloniki. Their Bulgarian pursuers made it to the border before being ordered to halt, as Greece had not officially entered the war.*

With nearly all of Bulgaria's Macedonian claims now under occupation, Ferdinand sat tight until, suddenly and with Russian military support, Romania declared war on Austria-Hungary and invaded Transylvania in August 1916. Taken by surprise, the Austro-Hungarians were pushed as far back as Hungary, but with further reinforcements (including German reserve divisions), Field Marshal von Mackensen halted the Romanian offensive. On September 1 Bulgarian and Ottoman troops marched into Southern Dobruja under fierce fire from fanatic Romanian defenders. Russian reinforcements arrived to prevent the Bulgarians from cutting rail and supply lines between the capital, Bucharest, and Constanta. Here the fiercest fighting occurred, with counterattack responded with counterattack. The Allies' failure to launch a new offensive against Macedonia from Greece in the South put additional stress on Romanian forces. Despite this, due to determined resistance along the Danube, the Bulgarian and German offensive ground to a halt and allowed the Romanians to launch a counteroffensive, which too ground to a halt when logistics proved to be a serious problem and not enough units could be moved up to continue pushes against Central Power lines.*

Falkenhayn was placed in command of the whole theater (with Mackensen remaining in command of German and Bulgarian forces), who launched a new offensive on September 18.*The slow and brutal advance was met by many unsuccessful Romanian counterattacks, which caused them to suffer heavy casualties. A second offensive by Mackensen was launched on October 19, and in the subsequent second battle of Cobadin the city of Constanta fell to Bulgarian forces. Further Bulgarian and German advances through the mountains inflicted heavy casualties on the Romanians, and a particular German officer, Lieutenant Rommel, led his company in securing Mt. Lescului almost single-handedly. With their supply situation growing desperate the Romanians decided to launch a front-wide counterattack as enemy forces drew closer to Bucharest itself. However, they did so without Russian support; three days after its start on December 1*Mackensen brought forward reserve Bulgarian troops and Falkenhayn launched his own offensive. The Romanian army virtually disintegrated and Bucharest fell on December 6.*The Romanian and Russian high commands favored fortifying their forces in Moldova and Northeastern Romania; thus they ceded the rest of Dobruja to Bulgarian occupation, which pleased Ferdinand and Prime Minister Radoslavov to no end.*

Meanwhile in Macedonia, the Allies had continued to reinforce their positions with news divisions, but the Bulgarians (with German and Austro-Hungarian support) had established a stable line from Albania to Southeastern Greece by the time the latter joined the war. In May of 1918 the Greeks attacked and successfully took Skra di Legen, the first major Greek offensive of the war. General d'Esperey wished to launch a general offensive against the Bulgarians; however, he needed approval and cooperation from all other generals on the front, and he achieved this in September. Bulgarian morale, at least among the higher-ups, was certainly low; they could see that the war was lost with the failure of the Spring Offensive and the impending collapse of the Ottoman Empire.*

Initial success of the offensive drove the Bulgarians back—in rather good order, contrary to what the Allied generals initially believed—despite the successful Bulgarian holding action at Doiran on September 18. The people's support for a war was already low to begin with; the reception of the declaration of war in 1915 was hated by many. By now, this hatred had boiled into complete wrath, and public support for both the Tsar and Radoslavov was rapidly collapsing. On September 19 the Bulgarian high command received reports that troops were starting to surrender without a fight, and thus ordered a general withdrawal along the whole line. This only further angered the Bulgarian people, and on September 27 the Agrarian National Union declared the monarchy dissolved and the birth of the Republic of Bulgaria. Five-thousand Army deserters and rebels threatened occupation of Sofia; the Tsar asked for and received an armistice on the 29th. It was put into effect the next day, September 30 1918, bringing Bulgaria out of the war. With the war brought to a conclusion before the destruction of Bulgaria itself, the majority of the rebels dispersed; the few remaining were detained by police. On October 3, with pressure mounting against the Tsar that "lost Bulgaria twice", Ferdinand abdicated and went into exile. His twenty-four year old son, Boris III, succeeded to the throne. Similarly Radoslavov resigned and, fearing persecution, imprisonment and even death, fled to Germany.*

The Treaty that was set in stone during the post-war conferences was debated heavily among the Allied powers; and, like Versailles to Germany, was heavily protested by both members of the Bulgarian government and by the general populace, but they both were in no position to argue against the victorious Allied powers. Ceding Western Thrace to an Allied occupation (later given to Greece), several hundred square kilometers of land to the new Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, and (perhaps most humiliatingly) the cession, once again, of Southern Dobruja to Romania. Further, the army was shrunk down to just one division plus supporting units, amounting to just 20,000 men (a far cry from the 500,000 or more fielded during the Second Balkan War), and a reparations bill amounting to a staggering (for Bulgaria) £100 million, which would prove to be a very heavy burden both on the Bulgaria economy and diplomatic relations for years to come.*

The Tsardom of Bulgaria as it stands in 1920 is, as could be assumed, not nearly as prosperous as she was between wars. Bulgaria's few natural resources with the potential of bringing great wealth were as yet untapped. The military was now regarded a paper tiger (or a paper hare); the technology for mass-harvesting grain and other farm products was nearly non-existent. The Agrarian National Union continued calling for the overthrow of the monarchy, as did the newly-formed Communist Party. It would take years, if not decades, to successfully pay off the reparations to the Allies while simultaneously growing and expanding the economy with the flow of capital. Boris would need to institute new economic reforms, with the cooperation of his parliament, and join the League of Nations if she were ever to grow out of the pit she had been thrown into.*
 
626px-Regeringen_Ed%C3%A9n.jpg

Sweden in an Era of Political Reform​
The early 20th century was a time of major sociopolitical reform in Sweden, with a modern democracy emerging from a country that had relied upon a strong monarch for a long time. Indeed, the monarch held a significant position in the political system on paper. All executive power belonged to the monarch, as long as he agreed to consult with his advisors (the government) before making decisions. On paper this allowed almost unlimited power to His Majesty, but in reality he must respect the will of the Riksdag and government if he wants to keep his privileges and power, with the government making the decisions and the king simply agreeing to it and ensuring that the kingdom's stability would not be threatened. The Riksdag was necessary because it was in charge of the budget and state incomes and expenses, without which the country could not be governed for obvious reasons. This still allowed the monarch a significiant amount of power when it came to keeping undesirable individiuals and parties, such as the anti-monarchist Social Democrats, away from government, since the monarch was the one in charge of appointing the Prime Minister. However, as seen in the Edén Cabinet, where social democrats and liberals cooperated, the king was powerless to entirely block the emerging Social Democratic from power. Parliamentarism was finally starting to take hold in Sweden, replacing the autocratic model of the past.

The strong power of the monarch was not the only thing that made the Swedish political system during the 19th and 20th centuries unique. Until 1909 voting was limited and anything but universal or equal, even for men. In order to vote before the reforms in 1909, you had to be a man with a minimum income of 800 Riksdaler/Kronor, own property worth at least 1000 Riksdaler/Kronor or lends property worth 6000 Riksdaler/Kronor. In 1908 this meant that 500,000 men were allowed to vote, 700,000 were not allowed to vote and another 100,000 would have been allowed to vote if they did not have outstanding debt or because of other reasons. Women, numbering aproximately 1,400,000 in total, were not allowed to vote. Votes were also weighted to give rich voters more influence in municipal elections, however this did not affect the General Elections. The 1909 electoral reform, pushed for by the liberals and social democrats, granted another 500,000 men voting rights by eliminating most financial restrictions in the General Elections. As long as you were not bankrupt or in the poorhouse, had been conscripted and paid your taxes, you could vote. In 1911, the first elections with true universal male suffrage were held with the liberal Free-Minded National Association becoming the largest party in the Riksdag. In 1918 the weighted voting in the municipal elections were abolished, and it was not long before the liberals strongly pushed for universal suffrage. In 1919 the Riksdag voted yes, with the reform supposed to be in effect in 1921 due to the complications of changing the constitution. Due to this women were not allowed to vote in the upcoming 1920 elections.

The men, because they were men, who were vital to steer Sweden into this new era of democracy and equality can be found in the cabinet of Prime Minister Nils Edén that was gathered on the 19th of October, 1917. During the 1917 elections the Swedish Social Democratic Party gained 31.1% of the votes and became the largest party in the Riksdag, with the Free-Minded National Association coming second with 27.6%. The conservative right-party, the General Electoral League, made a poor showing and only gained 24.7% of the votes, a loss of 11.8 percentage units compared to the 1914 election. Two Agrarian Parties also existed, hoping to represent the farmers in a political climate that was heavily focused on the industries, industrialists and the proletarians. These two parties, the Farmers' League and the National Farmers' Association, gained 8.4% of the votes. Finally, a split in the Social Democratic Party had also led to the creation of the more radical Social Left Democratic Party of Sweden, consisting of the youth organisation of the Social Democratic Party, it preached a more radical pacifist and internationalist policy. This message had struck a tone among many in Sweden, and the party managed to catch 8% of the votes.

Even though the Social Democratic party had won the plurality of the votes, it was not seen as acceptable to have a Social Democrat Prime Minister in the political turmoil around the world during that time, and instead His Majesty Gustav V offered Nils Edén of the Free-Minded National Association the position of Prime Minister. He swiftly formed a government with the Social Democrats, even though the King and the Conservatives tried to stop this through various indirect manipulations, offering them ministerial positions in the Department of Education, Finance and Naval Affairs in exchange for their support. This was a strongly progressive and liberal force, with 148 of 230 of the votes in the Riksdag, in Sweden at the time that swiftly pushed for many of the electoral reforms that were mentioned earlier and ensured that Sweden joined the League of Nations. The conservatives and radical leftists both though that the League of Nations would be a danger to Swedish neutrality and opposed this, but they stood no chance against the majority that Liberals and Social Democrats presented together. It should be noted that the Russian Revolution and the fears of a Socialist uprising in Sweden helped to speed up the democratisation process in the country.

Moving forward into 1920, the Liberals and Social Democrats have succeeded in their common goal to reform Sweden into a democratic country based on parliamentarism. It is now to be seen whether this cooperation can continue to govern Sweden or if the parties will go their separate ways from now on. On economic issues, the two parties are radically different and cooperation may prove difficult in the long-term, and perhaps the conservatives will once again retake their strong standing in politics. The elections of 1920 will be able to tell us more on how Sweden will be transformed in the future, but it should not be forgotten that women will not be able to vote in the 1920 elections, which will make the 1923 elections another exciting moment for Swedish politics. Will the one million new votes from women have a significant effect on the outcome of the 1923 elections or not?
 
Last edited:
[center
Treaty of Rapallo
[/center]


[X] - Peter I Representative from the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes

(OOC: Signing this now, even if it doesn't get counted for this turn.)