As the title says. The 3rd level carrier also shows up together with the 5 and 6, while the CVL seems to be in wrong order.
Upvote
0
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Is that a question?
I am talking about researching up to, i think, basic carrier (highest without the better engine and basic radar). That gives me something (CV-2) and De Grasse-Klasse (CV-4).
When i research IMproved i get class cv-3, cv-4 and cv-5.
Seems to be wrong.
They are, i been redoing the naval techs for Japaneses, so far doing good. Yes i removed those carrier models from battlecruiser sections. But this mod is for The Pacific, wont be messing with germany at the moment. So much work to do 
He's saying that if you look in the BC tech column then when you develop (I think) BC-4 you can also build CV-3. While the CV tree goes CV1, CV2, CV4.
No, it makes no sense to me either because building carriers is rather different to building battlecruisers. The only reason I can think they've done it is to mimic the conversion of ships such as Lexington and Furious from BC to CV.
That makes sense - conversion carriers were pretty much the planning case for many majors including Germany, Italy and Japan.
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/germany.htm#auxil Here's some historical info for German conversions but these should all be classed as auxilliary CVL as they were merchant ship and cruiser conversions. The only German carriers by design were Graf Zeppelin and peter Strasser, and any future classes should have been imaginary - Germany never really seeked to design a stand alone carrier class after not even completing the Graf Zeppelin project.
There is another small associated bug, even with the current setting - the Graf Zeppelin class carrier should be early and the Potsdam class carrier should be semi modern, not the other way around as they are now. And this is plainly keeping with the order the projects were started, and not with the magnitude and scope of each project.
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/germany.htm#auxil Here's some historical info for German conversions but these should all be classed as auxilliary CVL as they were merchant ship and cruiser conversions. The only German carriers by design were Graf Zeppelin and peter Strasser, and any future classes should have been imaginary - Germany never really seeked to design a stand alone carrier class after not even completing the Graf Zeppelin project.
There is another small associated bug, even with the current setting - the Graf Zeppelin class carrier should be early and the Potsdam class carrier should be semi modern, not the other way around as they are now. And this is plainly keeping with the order the projects were started, and not with the magnitude and scope of each project.
That because the battlecruiser were already built and they have been converted into bc/cv, like the USN Lexington. Later on it wouldnt have no use for this bc or cv in that techs, so it wouldnt make any sense. If they allows conversions so you can convert ships into some vary models it would be more interesting.
The USN had alot of cruiser hulls (cleveland class) and some were halt to make light carriers. The escort carriers from transport hulls, samn thing the Japanese did as well.
The USN had alot of cruiser hulls (cleveland class) and some were halt to make light carriers. The escort carriers from transport hulls, samn thing the Japanese did as well.
It doesn't make sense. The reason that it doesn't is that the US and UK already have the battlecruisers although they don't have the techs.
Further, the CV-3 for the British is the Ark Royal. This is nonsense because the Ark Royal was not a BC conversion. It was built as a carrier from the start.
Both of these are bugs rather than doctrinal objections.