-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I find the mere suggestion of this completely repugnant.
The relentless progress of civilization always brings casualties. Can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs and all that. People who can't stand wine spliced with extract from rotten fish innards are sadly among these. Of course modern Scandinavia has obviously attained high level of cultural sophistication, as dishes like Surströmming readily demonstrate.
About casualities you may ask Quintilius Varus.
Probably one of those conservative hardliners who detested garum as a hipster craze and saw Germanics as tropey noble savages. Not a real Roman, clearly.
The difference between the Norse and Germanic peganism around 300 BC would probably be minimal.
Game start not to far away from Germanic origins (Nordic Bronze age):
Nordic Bronze age 1200 BC:
Migration from scandinavia was constant for centuries, thus erlier germanic migrations got pressured and influenced by the next.
The expansion of the Germanic tribes
750 BC – AD 1:
Game start not to far away from Germanic origins (Nordic Bronze age):
Nordic Bronze age 1200 BC:
Migration from scandinavia was constant for centuries, thus erlier germanic migrations got pressured and influenced by the next.
The expansion of the Germanic tribes
750 BC – AD 1: