Time Consumer said:
Being curious is an excellent quality.
As long as you don't expect an answer.
(I felt like answering for Garbon ...)
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Being curious is an excellent quality.
As long as you don't expect an answer.
(I felt like answering for Garbon ...)
Garbon said:
a bird tells me that the delay might have something to do with economic perspective(s). tell me i am wrong .
here is your chance to confirm what "you had been told"
Garbon said:
what part of less posting, more mapping. Every post garbon makes, is time not spent working on that map! Back to work Garbon, or no Croissants for you!
While talking to birds might be a fun diversion, I'd question the idea of analyzing their response beyond the aesthetics of their song.beregic said:a bird tells me that the delay might have something to do with economic perspective(s). tell me i am wrong .
here is your chance to confirm what "you had been told"
@panther - I think carbs are out this season. No croissants for me.
Garbon said:
Fine, I'll give you health shakes. Now finish, so that AGCEEP 2, and Interregnum 2 might actually exist before 2010.
Garbon said:
well said , will do that
but they are very melodic at the same time
on a seond note what could be the reason NOBODY else is offering themselves into finnishing it
assuming that they would be more then welcome to do so just "hitting" ,yet again, the possible economic interest aspect...
For me, the economic balance problems were one of the initial reasons I rejected the idea of converting Interregnum to a new map.
That, and the BB increase inherent in having more provinces.
I have come around, but I see there are challenges, especially in regions that now have many more provinces. How does one best divide the previsous levels of tax and MP.
It can't be a styraight-sum division, because with more provinces the core costs of the techs also go up (or, at least, more countries are in higher brackets more easily).
I can see that you would want to playtest a lot to get the balance right.
That, and the BB increase inherent in having more provinces.
I have come around, but I see there are challenges, especially in regions that now have many more provinces. How does one best divide the previsous levels of tax and MP.
It can't be a styraight-sum division, because with more provinces the core costs of the techs also go up (or, at least, more countries are in higher brackets more easily).
I can see that you would want to playtest a lot to get the balance right.
Matty, it's not like we even have a remotely set date for when the new AGCEEP map will be out...
panther-anthro said:
Yes, and the flight was awful.
But I made out with the oracle, whose powers are truly mystic.