'
9 January 2006
Yearly Evaluation of the Group
I opened the year meeting with a walk throu of the different cases and suggestions, as well as hearing the boards perspective.
Mainly conclution is that the year 2005 had been good, and after the reform in the Group the results have increased to the level of very good.
Still their is matters we need to adjust, this is however mostly Game Rule Based, and will be done by the board in the
speed and progress they find most suited for the matters.
Concerning Board and Staff metings their is already considered to be done in closed sessions, this matter have been slightly expended to now also cover
all forms of internal staff conversations, related to the Group.
The Group Governing Bodey rules have showed themself to be complicated and some is hard to follow, this is due to practical and
for this reason will the Group leader expect an request from the board to adjust the a few GGBR they may want, and i will look into
their request with intention of making thair work easier when i recive the official request.
There will soon be held a new Board election, and the 3rd board member will at this meeting be elected.
Currently the Board have been operating with a Board off 2, for the last months, after Revulution resigned as Board member.
This could cause problems in prosessing cases, as the voting prosess would have 2 who voted on Game Rules only, however the Board shall get credit for good
work especially in this matters, as they have managed to process alot of cases even only with 2 board members.
The Envirement in the Group i consider to be very stabile, and in general will i say that the members are reliable, evan tho it have been some few cases open for for
debuting, but i will say that my general opinion, is that the group have a stabile form.
When it comes to commitment will i say that i in general are happy with the individual players commitment to games, i have made the General statistics i promised for
6 months ago, and my general conclution is that, 85% of the group members have a satisfactional or better commitment to the Game and pre game planning phases.
94% of the members have setesfactional or better behaviour. (Statistic based on player number and player hours from after refrom 2005 - 1 jan 2006).
Still do i consider that some who have acted as Allience leaders must improve their leadership of alliences, as some have complained on to little commitment and comunications from some who
have been alliance leaders, additionaly complaints resived in 2005 are, "to slow game startup", "to many rehosts", "to complicated voting system", and
"hard to get in contact with staff".
Now this matters i have tried to resolve as good as i can, and some like "to many rehosts" is a tecnical matter i wont manage to do much with personaly, however Tempus
has worked extremly much on a very good solution on how to avoid this tecnical problems who can occour, and he will within shortly via the Board make his report avalible for the group members.
When it comes to "hard to get in contact with staff" this matter have after my opinion been resolved as all of you have my phone number, as well as we try to have staff online at least 12 hours pr day, and the board mail
and my email is checked on dayli basis, the "to complicated voting system" is still not
rewieved completly, as its very hard to do adjustments to it and still maintain the Group structure i want, however with time will it be easyer to evaluate it, as we then get more data
to analyse.
When it comes to possible matters who are open for discussion, i would say that i as Group leader have not attended at Board Conversations as observer as im suppose to, but me together with the board
have concluded this not to be needed, but have not made any official guide line on it. This is a practical solution my self together with the board have made, and the function of the board
is highly professional, so we have concluded that my presens is not needed in general basis, however from time to time are i included, and i recive updates on mail as well as
on voice with regular basis. Additionaly have i not resolved the situation with only 2 board members as the last months have had, and i have not fast enugth arranged for a 3rd board member, on this matter however
thair will be an improvement, so we should be set for electing the 3rd board member within a very few weeks.
Yearly Evaluation of the Board
My yearly investegation of the board and board members is concluded with the conclution that the board have doen its job according to the expectations as i as the group leader would have,
and that thay have done this with a faster timeframe then expected, and with a remarkable higher quality then expected.
The general conclution of the investigation of the board 2005,
is that the Board is that the current sitting board is highly qualifiyd for their position.
High Command Group
Leader of the Group
Richard R. Rönhovde
+46 76 235 66 26
ronhovde@hotmail.com
Board
Tempus
R2D2
board_hcgroup@hotmail.com
High Command
9 January 2006
Yearly Evaluation of the Group
I opened the year meeting with a walk throu of the different cases and suggestions, as well as hearing the boards perspective.
Mainly conclution is that the year 2005 had been good, and after the reform in the Group the results have increased to the level of very good.
Still their is matters we need to adjust, this is however mostly Game Rule Based, and will be done by the board in the
speed and progress they find most suited for the matters.
Concerning Board and Staff metings their is already considered to be done in closed sessions, this matter have been slightly expended to now also cover
all forms of internal staff conversations, related to the Group.
The Group Governing Bodey rules have showed themself to be complicated and some is hard to follow, this is due to practical and
for this reason will the Group leader expect an request from the board to adjust the a few GGBR they may want, and i will look into
their request with intention of making thair work easier when i recive the official request.
There will soon be held a new Board election, and the 3rd board member will at this meeting be elected.
Currently the Board have been operating with a Board off 2, for the last months, after Revulution resigned as Board member.
This could cause problems in prosessing cases, as the voting prosess would have 2 who voted on Game Rules only, however the Board shall get credit for good
work especially in this matters, as they have managed to process alot of cases even only with 2 board members.
The Envirement in the Group i consider to be very stabile, and in general will i say that the members are reliable, evan tho it have been some few cases open for for
debuting, but i will say that my general opinion, is that the group have a stabile form.
When it comes to commitment will i say that i in general are happy with the individual players commitment to games, i have made the General statistics i promised for
6 months ago, and my general conclution is that, 85% of the group members have a satisfactional or better commitment to the Game and pre game planning phases.
94% of the members have setesfactional or better behaviour. (Statistic based on player number and player hours from after refrom 2005 - 1 jan 2006).
Still do i consider that some who have acted as Allience leaders must improve their leadership of alliences, as some have complained on to little commitment and comunications from some who
have been alliance leaders, additionaly complaints resived in 2005 are, "to slow game startup", "to many rehosts", "to complicated voting system", and
"hard to get in contact with staff".
Now this matters i have tried to resolve as good as i can, and some like "to many rehosts" is a tecnical matter i wont manage to do much with personaly, however Tempus
has worked extremly much on a very good solution on how to avoid this tecnical problems who can occour, and he will within shortly via the Board make his report avalible for the group members.
When it comes to "hard to get in contact with staff" this matter have after my opinion been resolved as all of you have my phone number, as well as we try to have staff online at least 12 hours pr day, and the board mail
and my email is checked on dayli basis, the "to complicated voting system" is still not
rewieved completly, as its very hard to do adjustments to it and still maintain the Group structure i want, however with time will it be easyer to evaluate it, as we then get more data
to analyse.
When it comes to possible matters who are open for discussion, i would say that i as Group leader have not attended at Board Conversations as observer as im suppose to, but me together with the board
have concluded this not to be needed, but have not made any official guide line on it. This is a practical solution my self together with the board have made, and the function of the board
is highly professional, so we have concluded that my presens is not needed in general basis, however from time to time are i included, and i recive updates on mail as well as
on voice with regular basis. Additionaly have i not resolved the situation with only 2 board members as the last months have had, and i have not fast enugth arranged for a 3rd board member, on this matter however
thair will be an improvement, so we should be set for electing the 3rd board member within a very few weeks.
Yearly Evaluation of the Board
My yearly investegation of the board and board members is concluded with the conclution that the board have doen its job according to the expectations as i as the group leader would have,
and that thay have done this with a faster timeframe then expected, and with a remarkable higher quality then expected.
The general conclution of the investigation of the board 2005,
is that the Board is that the current sitting board is highly qualifiyd for their position.
High Command Group
Leader of the Group
Richard R. Rönhovde
+46 76 235 66 26
ronhovde@hotmail.com
Board
Tempus
R2D2
board_hcgroup@hotmail.com
High Command
Last edited: