• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Awesome! This look like it'll be a fun AAR.

Look out, Rommel! I've got 10 divisions and I'm not afraid to use them. :D

Even though we'll have set positions from the start, can people be demoted and promoted base on preformance? For example, if I did poorly, I could be removed from command. However, if I do well, maybe I could ascend through the ranks, maybe even taking a cabinet position (like Chief of Staff).

But it shouldn't just be "you lost a battle, therefore you're fired." It should be decided on multiple factors: how many battles have you won/lost? Who were you facing? What were the odds? What were the effects of your victory/defeat?
 
If it's still open, I'd like to run for President of the United States.

Also, i think we should have a 'Vice-President' who doesn't really do anything unless the 'President' will be absent for a while, for illness or vacation or such. It'd have to be more than just a day w/o the Prez for the Veep to step up, but I think it'd be a good idea.
 
Rocketman said:
If it's still open, I'd like to run for President of the United States.

Also, i think we should have a 'Vice-President' who doesn't really do anything unless the 'President' will be absent for a while, for illness or vacation or such. It'd have to be more than just a day w/o the Prez for the Veep to step up, but I think it'd be a good idea.

I'm guessing we're doing the U.S. EXCELLENT! :D

If you're President, who will run against you in '36? Does anyone DARE challenge Rocketman? :rofl:

I suppose we could call a vote here in the forum.
 
And remember when we start building more divisions we need to expand the 1st Infantry to be part of the 1st Infantry Corps....which of course I will command!

:)
 
Seidita said:
I would officially like to run for President of the United States of America.

Rocketman said:
If it's still open, I'd like to run for President of the United States.

Wow, it looks like we are going to have an elections here ;)
 
CSL_GG said:
And remember when we start building more divisions we need to expand the 1st Infantry to be part of the 1st Infantry Corps....which of course I will command!

:)

sorry, we don´t need divisions ;)
we need strong fighter force! :p
 
Vote Seidita, the road to victory

wk%20victory.jpg
 
Presidential Elections 1936 and more...

It seems you've accepted my proposal for elections. So I changed Constitution of the US (new name for our rules) that way. President got some new powers (since he's elected). He'll be one to choose members of cabinet once he's elected. Also added part called Events into first post to info about ongoing events/decision making and so one, so new readers or event old ones can fast and easy find what is going on and don't have to read all thread. Presidential elections are event #1 for now, we have two candidates, Seidita and Rocketman. They should tell us more about their policies, not just put expesive billboards to attack out subconscious mind :wacko: :D

Also, as Rocketman suggested, vice presidential office has been constitued.

As for promotions/demotions, president has new rights according this, so check constitution. I believe this can make it ;)

@ThewEiRdOne27 - what army group do you want to command? I'd suggest you Chief of Atlantic Army post :)

@CSL_GG - 1st Infantry Division, wouldn't -let's say- 1st Army do the job better?

@metal - you possibilities are also broad, so make you decision :)
 
Can you chose yourself what type of general you want to be?
In that case I want to be a General, with skill 3 and panzer leader and offensive doctrine as my special abilities. :)
 
metal said:
Can you chose yourself what type of general you want to be?
In that case I want to be a General, with skill 3 and panzer leader and offensive doctrine as my special abilities. :)
It seems you want to be in-game general as well as board one too ;) OK, I think I can impersonate you into game as any other field commanders. But regarding your skill/traits, this shouldn't be your decision only. Your rank will be gained by promotions (see Constitution), starting as Mj. General. Skill 1-3, sort of random die roll. Traits gained along the time, assigned by me :rolleyes: Factors to affect this might be your performance, success with different kind of actions, etc. But first traits can be assigned by randomness as well, with chance to get no trait, more traits, as well as Old Guard one. Decide yourself if you want to try to get your first trait this way or stay without trait till time you get some from action.

So, Mj. General metal. Choose 1, 2 or 3 and I'll tell you your skill. Choose also # from 1 to 12 to determine your trait(s) if you wish.

TIP: Want to be promoted soon? No problem - we have elections! :eek: Tell your candidate about your preferencies ;)
 
Last edited:
I'm for it, Ederon. But when you say "Chief of Atlantic Army", do you mean I'll be chief of armies in the European theater, N. African theater, or both?
 
ThewEiRdOne27 said:
I'm for it, Ederon. But when you say "Chief of Atlantic Army", do you mean I'll be chief of armies in the European theater, N. African theater, or both?
Present Chief of XXX Army positions are meant as follows:
Mainland: American continent
Pacific: west of America
Atlantic: east of America
and where they met, there's diference... :eek:

But this is something that can be changed easily. If you (or anybody) have better suggestion how to divide armies, go on. ;)
 
Last edited:
Lord Ederon said:
Present Chief of XXX Army positions are meant as follows:
Mainland: American continent
Pacific: west of America
Atlantic: east of America
and where they met, there's deference... :eek:

But this is something that can be changed easily. If you (or anybody) have better suggestion how to divide armies, go on. ;)

Well, it's a little strange. While Chief of Pacific Army Forces sounds right, Chief of Atlantic Army sounds a little weird. My suggestion would be Chief of Atlantic Theater of Operations (CoATO). He's head of the Chief of European Theater of Operations (CoETO) and Chief of North African Theater of Operations (CoNATO). If need be, the CoATO can lead armies in South American conflicts.

In the Pacific, the Chief of Pacific Army Forces (CoPAF) heads over the Chief of South Pacific Army Forces (CoSPAF), Chief of Central Pacific Army Forces (CoCPAF), and Chief of Northern Pacific Army Forces (CoNPAF).

It's a little complex, but in the end it keeps people from trying to manage too much.

Oh yeah, the Navy has jurisdiction over the Marines. That said, if the Navy wants to "lend" the Marines to the Army for an attack, they may do so. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, as always, will have a say in the matter. The President has the authority as Commander-in-Chief to make the final decision.

Oh, my command post... I guess I'll be Chief of Atlantic Theater of Operations (man, that sounds cool! :D )
 
ThewEiRdOne27 said:
Well, it's a little strange. While Chief of Pacific Army Forces sounds right, Chief of Atlantic Army sounds a little weird. My suggestion would be Chief of Atlantic Theater of Operations (CoATO). He's head of the Chief of European Theater of Operations (CoETO) and Chief of North African Theater of Operations (CoNATO). If need be, the CoATO can lead armies in South American conflicts.

In the Pacific, the Chief of Pacific Army Forces (CoPAF) heads over the Chief of South Pacific Army Forces (CoSPAF), Chief of Central Pacific Army Forces (CoCPAF), and Chief of Northern Pacific Army Forces (CoNPAF).

It's a little complex, but in the end it keeps people from trying to manage too much.

Oh yeah, the Navy has jurisdiction over the Marines. That said, if the Navy wants to "lend" the Marines to the Army for an attack, they may do so. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, as always, will have a say in the matter. The President has the authority as Commander-in-Chief to make the final decision.

Oh, my command post... I guess I'll be Chief of Atlantic Theater of Operations (man, that sounds cool! :D )
Indeed its complex. And it might work. However, it'd be sort of weird now to have CoETO this time. I'm for CoATO and one step down CoAfTO (Chief of African Theater Operations). In Pacific, there could be CoPTO (Chief of Pacific Theater Operations), step down CoWPTO (Chief of Western Pacific Theatre Operations). Since there is Pacific Fleet, there is IMHO no need for so many separate officers (so few land there too).

What do you think about this?
 
Lord Ederon said:
Indeed its complex. And it might work. However, it'd be sort of weird now to have CoETO this time. I'm for CoATO and one step down CoAfTO (Chief of African Theater Operations). In Pacific, there could be CoPTO (Chief of Pacific Theater Operations), step down CoWPTO (Chief of Western Pacific Theatre Operations). Since there is Pacific Fleet, there is IMHO no need for so many separate officers (so few land there too).

What do you think about this?

I think it works. At this time, there is no need for either CoETO or CoAfTO. They can be created and assigned to commanders if and when the time comes.

With that, I will be glad to be CoATO.

BTW: Could we be assigned to multiple posts? Just in case we come up short on active members. Also, will you take any rolls in this AAR Ederon other than the guy who keeps things running (maybe Chief of Army?).

As far as your question, Backfire, I think it would be safe to assume that the Earl Browder Revolution even has a very slim chance of happening, as it would be very complicated. That said, it's not my decision, it's Ederon's.

Would you be interested in another post if it doesn't work out, Backfire?
 
Can a mod delete this post? The forum was acting up and I accidently posted twice.

Thanks.