• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(5228)

First Lieutenant
Aug 6, 2001
233
0
Visit site
I just recently read the book 'Justice at Nuremberg' by Robert E. Conot. In the very last chapter of the book, Conot gives the reader a brief look at Hitler and what may have caused him to act in the way he did.

Conot says that Hitler may have contracted syphilis about the time of World War I. The overt symptoms of the disease may have disappeared by the time the physician examined him for prior to his military service. The disease then became latent until 1937 where he experienced an attack of general paresis, a syphilis-engendered mental disease which usually appears about twenty years after the original infection.

I think readers will find this excerpt from the book quite interesting:

"Megalomania, paranoia, and a blunting of the moral senses are classically associated with the affliction. According to the Textbook of Abnormal Psychology, the paretic is extremely domineering, irritable, full of grandiose delusions, and likely to feel that he is an object of persecution: 'A loss of judgement is one of the first abnormalities to appear in general paresis and one which continues throughout the course of the illness. The paretics will not notice contradictions or unclearnesses in their own thinking or in the conversations of others... They complacently bring forth some absurd plan, disposing of obvious objections in an irrational fashion.... Mentally they seem to be in a sort of dream world in which their own ideas, wishes, fears, and everyday occurrences are mixed up with no distinction between fact and fancy....[The paretic] will be changeable, easily angered, sulky, emotionally excited at small events, will lose control of his temper or will have fits of crying and wailing with self-pity.... He will be careless in the face of danger, lack foresight with respect to approaching difficulty, and be quickly reassured after severe misfortune... Aburbt alteration of emotions is common.

'As the disease progresses thje motor symptoms become more and more pronounced. The disturbance of speech becomes quite obvious.... Movements are slow, clumsy, and awkward.... His gait is unsteady and shuffling... His features become flabby and expressionless while his voice is monotonous or tremulous...' Parkinson's disease is sometimes a concomitant." Justice at Nuremberg by Robet E. Conot. Carrol & Graf Publishers, Inc. New York. Copyright 1983

By the way, for anyone who is interested in World War II Justice at Nuremberg is a must read. Among other things it dispels all of the disgusting lies propagated by the Holocaust rerevisionists who claim the Holocaust never happened or grossly under report the actual number of murders committed against the Jews, Russians, Germans who opposed Hitler and basically Europeans in general.
 
I think we're all too ready to believe that Hitler's evil was the result of a disease. It sets our minds at rest. It lets us believe that humans are by nature good and only abnormal aflictions make them turn evil. I think this is an all too optimistic view on the nature of man.
I'm not excluding that Hitler did in fact suffer from syphilis.
 
Originally posted by Bylandt
I think we're all too ready to believe that Hitler's evil was the result of a disease. It sets our minds at rest. It lets us believe that humans are by nature good and only abnormal aflictions make them turn evil. I think this is an all too optimistic view on the nature of man.
I'm not excluding that Hitler did in fact suffer from syphilis.

Well I'm afraid I have to object to your logic. In no way was Mr. Conot, or I for that matter attempting to set peoples' minds at rest. We must not forget that the people who carried out Hitler's orders were usually quite healthy individuals with families and respectable jobs before the Nazis rose to power. Mr. Conot notes that Hitler rarely pushed subordinates to preform tasks that were contrary to their morals because there were always many more willing hands to pick up the slack.

As Mr. Conot says: Since any man who retainted his critical faculties or a sense of ethics departed or was weeded out, the circle surrounding Hitler had come to reflect the aberrant characteristics of the Fuhrer himself.

Many of the main defendents at the Nuremberg trials were not the sort of people you could really picture murdering millions of innocents or helping a mad man rise to a position of unquestioned power. Franz von Papen, former Chancellor of Germany before he was replaced by Hitler, was by no means a fanatical Nazi or someone of a mentally unbalanced nature. Franz von Papen was seen by the prosecution as "a hypocrite, compromising his principles to preserve his position."

Von Papen's associates and friends suffered the wrath of the Fuhrer when they were executed in Hitler's politcal purge, yet for a while von Papen continued to work for the Nazi regime. The British prosecutor, Maxwell Fyfe put it best when he said to von Papen, "You had seen your own friends, your own servants, murdered around you. You had the detailed knowledge of it, and the only reason that could have led you on and made you take one job after another from the Nazis was that you sympathized with their work. That is what I am putting against you Herr von Papen."

I get the impression that Conot was trying to impress upon the reader that although Hitler was demented and out of control, not a single one of his policies could have been carried out if there was not a multitude of minions to carry out his plans.
 
Many of the main defendents at the Nuremberg trials were not the sort of people you could really picture murdering millions of innocents or helping a mad man rise to a position of unquestioned power.

I have a hard time imaging *anyone* murdering millions of innocents. But maybe Bylandt's right - we would like to think that people are good by nature, although sometimes that might not be the case.
 
In his biography of Hitler, Ian Kershaw lists the Syphils theory as a myth. And because Mr. Kershaw´s book is supposed to be the most precise to date, I believe him...
Actually I think that one Hitler is much easier to understand then millions of Germans actively executing his orders and generally acting in a way that they believed would earn them the Führer´s approval.:(
Single madmen, there will always be. But a whole people executing the will of one madman will hopefully not be anymore one of these days...
 
Originally posted by Improfane
Single madmen, there will always be. But a whole people executing the will of one madman will hopefully not be anymore one of these days...

Rwanda, Bosnia, Kosovo...

And I'm not counting Staline's USSR, before and after WWII. Not entirely based on race, but still...
 
Originally posted by SoleSurvivor
(Kosovo: I don't see millions willingly carrying out genocide to please Milosevic.

True. But this was not the case either in nazi-Germany. Unless you count the "support of millions" for Hitler's regime. But it seems to me Milosevic had that support as well for his policy in Kosovo (even from the opposition). Maybe Serbs were even better informed on what he was doing than were the Germans on the Holocaust.