-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Hi guys im on vacation at the moment on the other side of australia to where im from, id love to test the new patch out but unfortunately im away till next week, id also like to buy together for victory but i feel it does not have fair enough discount, from what ive gathered it has less content than death or dishonour and is a more expensive price, gonna hold onto my steam wallet and wait for a cheaper deal. Has it ever been around 10 dollars or any cheaper?
I've got to say that I left Hungary to last to do the achievements, since it seemed to be so popular. I really enjoyed Romania, though staying Democratic as the Czechs and holding off the Germans has been the highlight of my DoD runs.
The formation of Austria-Hungary is obviously going to get people excited, similar to how people like the idea of reforming the Roman Empire in EU4 and CK2. I'll see if I get the two Hungarian achievements this week, as then I'll be back at 100%!
The formation of Austria-Hungary is obviously going to get people excited, similar to how people like the idea of reforming the Roman Empire in EU4 and CK2. I'll see if I get the two Hungarian achievements this week, as then I'll be back at 100%!
Does that mean that a naval overhaul is coming ?
Anyway, welcome @Bratyn and may the Coopers be with you
- Jul 23, 2007
- 12.812
- 38.541
afaik we have fixed all stuff introduced (you might not have gotten the fix yet). but feel free to list stuff to me so I can see if we missed something. Most reports are about old stuff still
Yea. well it seems to happen late game only. multithreading related
I agree, a 1933 start would be awesome, and add more of a political and economic aspect to the game. The major nations need a complete overhaul on the National Focus's.
Welcome to the team People!!!
No 1933 scenario please, that's too much preparation time. I am not exited about 1939 scenario either. The best part of HOI is always the building up toward war.
I filed a bug report yesterday that tags don´t follow the historical order of the focuses with historical focuses turned on (like germany dowing the SU before Weserübung) and that this also causes wars within a faction (Hungary and Romania being at war while both being in the axis). I observed none of this before the 26/6 update of 1.4.1. beta, so it seems new to me.
How about the bug that planes stop doing their assigned missions?
https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-1-air-wings-not-being-issued-orders.1031603/
Welcome to the new team members: reinforcements are very welcome.
SteelVolt, I hope that your burdens are easier to bear now!
SteelVolt, I hope that your burdens are easier to bear now!
I actually really love the 1939 start, as WW2 tends to play out until 1945 there, and not 1943 or 1942, which often happens in 1936 playthroughs. Plus, it's more fun for China.
I really like the idea of a 1933 start date as well. I have tried to modify this in but never got it to work properly. The game simply doesn't like starting before 1935. Starting in 1933 is when Germany really fell into the dark side and started their move toward national militarism. You could truly build an industrial power house with a few extra years in Germany. Muhhahahahaha
@podcat
No matter what your statistics will say, I will play Japan again and again! And I am not wondering that Austria-Hungary is that popular. There is a great fan base for kingdom franchise in the community, so if you would rework the German focus tree with a Kaiserreich tree, Germany Players would increase a lot.
Romania and the others are nice content, but compared to Spain, PR China, China and Turkey it was a bad choice. Nevertheless, my friends were happy with Yugoslavia and Romania ...
Starting 1936 makes sense, because players want to chose their focus from begin on. If they start 1939, some basic decisions are done and I guess people doesn't like that much. If you want to add another start, maybe 1933 or even 1918 could be interesting
Best news is that your team has grown. More developers for HOI4 means more and better content .... and fixes, of course
No matter what your statistics will say, I will play Japan again and again!
And I am not wondering that Austria-Hungary is that popular. There is a great fan base for kingdom franchise in the community, so if you would rework the German focus tree with a Kaiserreich tree, Germany Players would increase a lot.Romania and the others are nice content, but compared to Spain, PR China, China and Turkey it was a bad choice. Nevertheless, my friends were happy with Yugoslavia and Romania ...
Starting 1936 makes sense, because players want to chose their focus from begin on. If they start 1939, some basic decisions are done and I guess people doesn't like that much. If you want to add another start, maybe 1933 or even 1918 could be interesting
Best news is that your team has grown. More developers for HOI4 means more and better content .... and fixes, of course
podcat, did you fix the AI from madly researching doctrines and not keeping their tanks and airplanes up to date? And for that matter it seemed that no carrier aircraft were researched at all in 1.4.
For me, I cannot play the game if I am in 1942 and facing US 1933 biplanes fighters on their carriers while playing as Japan. Please get this sorted out! This is my favorite PDS game!
@podcat As a solo-Pol(and) player, I would love to see 1933 It would set up Poland as a more interesting and potentially powerful player (Yay Josef Pilsudski!) given the squabbles with Russia plus as a historian I love the political aspects behind the rise to Hitler. To me, they are very "popcorn grabbing" dramatic moments.
Love the game overall and hello to the new team members!
It would set up Poland as a more interesting and potentially powerful player (Yay Josef Pilsudski!) given the squabbles with Russia plus as a historian I love the political aspects behind the rise to Hitler. To me, they are very "popcorn grabbing" dramatic moments. Love the game overall and hello to the new team members!
A 1933 start would simply just weaken Germany. I see little other effects than that.
Intervening in 1936 when they remilitarize the Rhineland will very likely cause a german defeat already (and rightly so), and there were many occasions between 1933 and 1936 where the odds where even more in favor of the Allies.
Intervening in 1936 when they remilitarize the Rhineland will very likely cause a german defeat already (and rightly so), and there were many occasions between 1933 and 1936 where the odds where even more in favor of the Allies.
I think Darkest Hour proved that a 1933 start is a viable one, even though the Devs and many of the forumites disagree that that is a good date.@podcat As a solo-Pol(and) player, I would love to see 1933
Love the game overall and hello to the new team members!
Germany was very much weakened in DH in 1933. You essentially do what you can to improve your situation so you can even get to the point of churning out a modern military. Oh and for that matter, most of their army that they did start out with was way behind in technology. if I remember right, much of it is 1918 infantry.
That, and I do believe that 1933 was by far the most popular starting point of Darkest Hour. Devs, just go an have a look at the game and see what they've done and how it plays.