HQ and losses

[unmerged(94130)]

1) HQ would have to be a brigade rather than a division, because HQ division can slow down its armycorps. And it's a problem with armoured and mechanized corps.
HQ division are kept but become logistical division with a better bonus for the divisions in the province where it is stopped.

2) There is no a malus for looses.A division with 50% of its strengh is as effective as a division with 100% strengh. So a malus which ris with losses would be a good and a realist thing.

3) There is a problem...in french version, there is no the number of carrier in the spying screen.

4) And an idea for new tech teams...Italia, Germany or France don't have a doctrine tech teams with carrier tactics speciality. But these countries can build and use carrier. So i would like the possibility to create new tech teams with officiers who are fighting. Their differents assignments would give their specialities.

 

[ow592]

I think a HQ should be a division, but I don´t think, that a HQ can have brigades. HQ with a brigade is much too strong and too fast if you compare it with other units.

 

[{LD}Firestorm]

But take a hell of alot of time and cost to make.

 

[unmerged(94130)]

I think a HQ should be a division, but I don´t think, that a HQ can have brigades. HQ with a brigade is much too strong and too fast if you compare it with other units.

But it's already possible. You can add an AA, AT or artillery brigade at a HQ division.

I would that a HQ become a brigade which would be added at a division, with the same effects (command limit *2 and combat events), and the HQ division become a logistical division,with horses or trucks.

And i repeat but it would be great to can built TC points like transports or escorts.

 

[blue emu]

2) There is no a malus for looses.A division with 50% of its strengh is as effective as a division with 100% strengh. So a malus which ris with losses would be a good and a realist thing.

It is my understanding that exactly this "unit strength" penalty is already coded into the combat engine... and a unit at 50% strength only does 50% damage with each successful hit.

Do you have evidence that no such modifier exists?

 

[unmerged(94130)]

I tought taht there was not a malus for losses because when you click on a division during a combat, there isn't a malus, like weather, terrain or commander traits, and the efficienty combat percentage is the same for a division with 100% of its strengh and a division with the half of its men.

I add one thing :

It's not the good forum but i can't post in the FAQ forum...

So someone would can explain me the system of surprise and interception ?