My kingdom had +1 stability. There had been no wars, no demands on the nobles for a decade. The king had over 2500 prestige, all his vassals were devotedly loyal - the number value put on it was 100 - some of them were his friends. He even gave into every demand they made of him. The relationships between the various counties / duchies and the crown were in excess of +150.
And yet...
They still started a civil war. One revolted. The revolt was put down, but the king took no vengeance - he allowed the noble to keep the lands and titles. No sooner was that revolt put down than another occurred. And another. And another. And another.
I don't mind a challenge. I don't mind when the AI kicks my ass. All I ask is that there be some kind of logic to it. If the nobles are going to behave like that when I'm good to them, why not just treat them like shit? I mean, what's the point of worrying what they think? And if how one treats them makes no difference, is there any real point to the game?
And yet...
They still started a civil war. One revolted. The revolt was put down, but the king took no vengeance - he allowed the noble to keep the lands and titles. No sooner was that revolt put down than another occurred. And another. And another. And another.
I don't mind a challenge. I don't mind when the AI kicks my ass. All I ask is that there be some kind of logic to it. If the nobles are going to behave like that when I'm good to them, why not just treat them like shit? I mean, what's the point of worrying what they think? And if how one treats them makes no difference, is there any real point to the game?