ID-numbers

[Johan Elisson]

Leaders, Ministers and Events ID

Afghanistan		1-		AFG
Albania			1001-		ALB
Argentina		2001-		ARG
Austria-Hungary		3001-		U11
Belgium			4001-		BEL
Bhutan			5001-		BHU
Bolivia			6001-		BOL
Brazil			7001-		BRA
Bulgaria		8001-		BUL
Chile			9001-		CHL
China			10001-		CHC
Colombia		11001-		COL
Costa Rica		12001-		COS
Cuba			13001-		CUB
Denmark			14001-		DEN
Dominican Republic	15001-		DOM
Ecuador			16001-		ECU
El Salvador		17001-		SAL
Ethiopia		18001-		ETH
Finland 		19001-		FIN
France			20001-		FRA
Germany			21001-		GER
Greece			22001-		GRE
Guatemala		23001-		GUA
Haiti			24001-		HAI
Hedjaz			25001-		U03
Honduras		26001-		HON
Italy			27001-		ITA
Japan			28001-		JAP
Jebel Shammar		29001-		U01
Liberia			30001-		LIB
Luxemburg		31001-		LUX
Mexico			32001-		MEX
Mongolia		33001-		MON
Montenegro		34001-		MTN
Najd			35001-		SAU
Nepal			36001-		NEP
Netherlands		37001-		HOL
Nicaragua		38001-		NIC
Norway			39001-		NOR
Oman			40001-		OMN
Ottoman Empire		41001-		TUR
Panama			42001-		PAN
Paraguay		43001-		PAR
Persia			44001-		PER
Peru			45001-		PRU
Portugal		46001-		POR
Romania			47001-		ROM
Russia			48001-		RUS
Sanusia			49001-		U02
Serbia			50001-		SER
Siam			51001-		SIA
Spain			52001-		SPA
Sweden			53001-		SWE
Switzerland		54001-		SCH
Tibet			55001-		TIB
British Empire (ex. UK)	56001-		ENG
Uruguay			57001-		URU
USA			58001-		USA
Venezuela		59001-		VEN
Yemen			60001-		YEM
Zapata			61001-		U07

Random (events)		62001-		---

/Elisson

 

[brandnew70x7]

Why would you give Austria Hungary its own tag? You can just change that the country is called through the text.csv.

 

[irishpony]

beacause after the war the was another country called austria

 

[Johan Elisson]

In case Austria-Hungary splits up earlier than IRL, for example if dissent goes sky high or the country gets annexed while Germany still fights.

/Elisson

 

[StephenT]

If you are going to make Britain, Canada, Australia etc a single country, should the country name be "British Empire" rather than "United Kingdom"?

 

[Johan Elisson]

Originally posted by StephenT
If you are going to make Britain, Canada, Australia etc a single country, should the country name be "British Empire" rather than "United Kingdom"?

Matter of taste. You could think of it that you are the British government that give production and military orders to the other countries (that do exist if you think really hard ) or as you think, that you rule the British Empire with your magic hand.

Takes two seconds to edit so it isn't really a big issue.

/Elisson

 

[Allenby]

I'd vote British Empire

 

[irishpony]

as would i it has a nicer ring to it

 

[unmerged(14189)]

doesn't matter to me but, UK stands for United KINGDOM so that name pretty much encompasses the whole of the British empire. But then again as mentioned before British Empire sounds so much better.

 

[Johan Elisson]

United Kingdom stands for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland IIRC. Well, I've changed the name to British Empire following the majority in this thread, so, nothing more to say.

/Johan

 

[unmerged(14189)]

don't forget Wales and Scotland I have been proven wrong yet again.

 

[Allenby]

Originally posted by johnscorndogs
don't forget Wales and Scotland I have been proven wrong yet again.

England + Scotland + Wales = Great Britain

Great Britain + Northern Ireland = United Kingdom

hence United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, thus encompassing its four constituent parts.

 

[Kaiser Bill]

Originally posted by Allenby
England + Scotland + Wales = Great Britain

Great Britain + Northern Ireland = United Kingdom

hence United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, thus encompassing its four constituent parts.

British Empire is far more accurate if we are including the dominions of Australia etc.. as part of the core provinces of the British player.

Besides it sounds, as you say, much better.

 

[Kaiser Bill]

Originally posted by Kaiser Bill
British Empire is far more accurate if we are including the dominions of Australia etc.. as part of the core provinces of the British player.

Besides it sounds, as you say, much better.

Back to the beginning of the thread, am I right in assuming the following:

A: German leaders have ID tags in the number range specified. i.e. 21001 and upwards.

B: Leaders and events must have different ID numbers. So if, Crown Prince Willhelm is 21001, then an event cannot have the same number.

 

[Johan Elisson]

Actually, they can be the same, meaning that German events start with 21001, 21002, 21003, leaders start with 21001, 21002, 21003, and ministers also.

/Johan

 

[Kaiser Bill]

Originally posted by Johan Elisson
Actually, they can be the same, meaning that German events start with 21001, 21002, 21003, leaders start with 21001, 21002, 21003, and ministers also.

/Johan

Thanks, that makes things a lot clearer...

 

[StephenT]

I think these ID codes will also be needed, perhaps?

Ireland			63001-		IRE
Estonia			64001-		EST
Latvia			65001-		LAT
Lithuania		66001-		LIT
Poland			67001-		POL
Byelorussia		68001-		BLR
Ukraine			69001-		UKR
Georgia			70001-		GEO
Armenia			71001-		ARM
Azerbaijan		72001-		AZB
White Russians		73001-		SIB
Soviet Union		74001-		SOV

Using SIB for Admiral Kolchak's Whites means that the RUS code would belong to Denikin's Whites. Unless anyone thinks it would be better the other way around

Probably also need codes for the Austro-Hungarian successor states, but I've not thought that far ahead yet.

 

[Allenby]

And of course potential rebel states too, i.e. Ulster.

 

[StephenT]

Another code:

Makhnovshchina    75001-    U17

This will also require changes to country.csv:

U17;LightRed;SOV;MIN;X

and to text.csv:

U17;Makhnovshchina;;;;;;;;;;x

 

[Allenby]

Presumably, Ulster will have 76001- and U18?