• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(3967)

First Lieutenant
May 21, 2001
267
0
Visit site
What do you think about a scenario where all mayors from GC where replaced by smaller neighbouring states an example:England=Scotland,France=Bretagne,Prussia=Brandenburg,
Russia=Pskov,Spain=Navarra,Austria=Hungary....?????
 
Just set it up with the IGC-or have a configuration tool packaged with EU2, if or when it appears on the horizon.
 
Originally posted by Gurli
What do you think about a scenario where all mayors from GC where replaced by smaller neighbouring states an example:England=Scotland,France=Bretagne,Prussia=Brandenburg,
Russia=Pskov,Spain=Navarra,Austria=Hungary....?????

Do it, it is easy with IGC config tool. :)
Even a total complete idiot cant fail, except if somebody implements a corrupt zip archive. ;) :D
 
Originally posted by VultureGFF
WOT IGC 2.3 sucks? HOW DARE YOU!!!
BURN THE HEATHEN! BURN HIM

ok I hate Korea, but it is good

Actually, considering some of my other posts, I tend to agree with Gurli over this-it's not as good as the previous IGC (2.2), although not using quite as vehement or graphic a term.
 
Hmmm, in my oppinion 2.3 is one of the best? I support the ditching of Korea. But I see no further problems...
Why do you find 2.2 better?
 
Oh, I'm petty-I'm still mad about the English CB shields I had to put back.

Oh, and the Vinland option starts with them far to strong vis a vis the proposed revisionist history.

Oh, and Ayuthayya's colonial dynamism is a poor choice to solve the perceived Mekong problem, and is ahistorical.

Oh, and Korea sucks.

Oh, and......do I need to go on-it's all in various posts I've made on the boards.