LeonidOst said:How can i post pisc ?
LeonidOst said:I will work with Russia
I am planning to make icons for Russia (white movement,empire and republik),Belorussia,Ukraine and ROA
But there is no icons for tanks and airplanes![]()
becouse there were no one in history
LeonidOst said:I will work with Russia
I am planning to make icons for Russia (white movement,empire and republik),Belorussia,Ukraine and ROA
But there is no icons for tanks and airplanes![]()
becouse there were no one in history
Well, USSR WAS Russia, regardless of its structure. Remember, that Moscow was the capital, Russian was the official language everywhere in USSR etc. Although that can be argued if considered from metaphisical or civilisational approach, it is rather incorrect to consider Russia a member of the USSR.So russia did exist, it was just a member of a communist federation. So soviet airplanes and tanks is the way to go!
Akira said:Well, USSR WAS Russia, regardless of its structure. Remember, that Moscow was the capital, Russian was the official language everywhere in USSR etc. Although that can be argued if considered from metaphisical or civilisational approach, it is rather incorrect to consider Russia a member of the USSR.
So the state of Berlin is Germany and England is the United Kingdom? Ontario is Canada? All parts of a Federation are a part of the country.
Austria-Hungary was a union based mostly on Austria, but Hungary was the sucessor(sp?) of A-H.
Scotland is an integral part of the United Kingdom. Bavaria is an integral part of Germany and Quebec is an integral part of Canada. All members of a federation are a part of the federation.
When countries left the Soviet Socialist Union there wasn't any union and as Russia was the only country left they were therefore not a union but Russia again.
Akira said:Ok.
The cases of Berlin and Ontario are very different from that of England. Remember, that Germany and Canada are countries that are made up of smaller autonomous pieces that have no clearly dominant parts, unlike USSR.
United Kingdom is a different case, more similar to USSR, since it is composed of constituent countries. And in the way how England is dominant, you might indeed consider that England = United Kingdom.
Since when?
Dagestan and Mordovia are integral parts of the Russian Federation, so?
I suggest you ask people from post-soviet countries what were they part of, Russia or a communist federation? As somebody living in such a country I can tell you for sure what the answer will be.
Think of Dagestan. Or Tibet.England is England, United Kingdom is so much more
Since 1919. Although that probably wasn't the general thought after 1920.
But they probably do claim that what they try to break away is London (which is England). Also, when a region has an independance movement, that usually means that it is NOT the dominant or equal part.Although the Scottish probably don't claim they belong to England.
And so if Russia was (or is) a dictatorship? Remember, Spain is not a dictatorship, yet the basks or catalans don't seem to feel that they belong to an obscure federation.Well yes, they might say Russia because it was a dictatorship.
Soviet Union (USSR)
The constitution of the 1922-1991 Soviet Union (USSR) theoretically provided for a voluntary federation or confederation of soviet socialist republics. Each was notionally governed by its own supreme council and had the right to secede. Furthermore, some republics themselves possessed further nominally self-governing units. Two of them, Belarus and Ukraine, were even members of the United Nations, some other republics had their own foreign ministries. In practice, the system of one-party government found in the Soviet Union meant that governance of the Union was highly centralised, with important decisions taken by the leaders of the Communist Party in Moscow and merely 'rubber stamped' by local institutions. Nonetheless, with the introduction of free, competitive elections in the final years of the Soviet Union, the Union's theoretically federal structure became a reality in practice; this occurred only for a brief interim period, as the elected governments of many republics demanded their right to secede and became independent states. Thus the Soviet Union's de jure federal structure played a key role in its dissolution.
Treaty of Trianon said:Whereas the former Austro-Hungarian Monarchy has now ceased to exist, and has been replaced in Hungary by a national Hungarian Government
Yes, but does that mean that RF isn't Russia?I'd say say is Dagestan is Dagestan.
Tibet is an autonomous entity within China, similar (ok, not the same) like Dagestan to RF. Remember, that there is no "Russian republic" within RF.Tibet hower doesn't belong to a federation. So, Tibet = China.
It is still composed of autonomous entities.Spain isn't a federation.
Well, I personally don't mind Russia being "undemocratic". I don't even believe that democracy is good for humankind, considering the way the world is going. But that is a discussion for some other time.I won't speak my mind on the democratic state of Russia, I consider that too sensitive.
Perhaps we should end our OT discussion.