• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
All caught up again. :) Followed the career of The Bear from its beginning to his triumph in India. The Assyrian-Nestorian angle is indeed an interesting one.
Nahir on the other hand, was a tortured titan.
Nahir the Bear is a very interesting character - as you can probably tell from his frankly ridiculous stats
Wow - you certainly benefited from whatever short circuited that event chain, gaining a useable Boss++ character into the bargain.
Reluctant to send his realm into civil war, Nahir renounced the Cosmasians and returned to the formal services of the Church for the first time in decades – securing his peaceful ascension.
He may be as mad as a cut snake in some respects, but this was a very wise choice.
As the realm appeared to be approaching its first period of peace in a generation, an emissary from the distant St Thomas Christians southern India’s Malabar Coast arrived in Nineveh, fellow Nestorians, with a plea for help.
Aha, a nice little teaser.
At the decisive battle of the war at Isdhoo, the superiority of Assyrian arms was made clear for all to see as, despite a significant numerical advantage, the Cholans were heavily beaten by Nehor and send into a disorderly retreat.
And so it proved - looks like maybe terrain, a big cavalry advantage and the Bear’s extraordinary military genius must have come into play there for the victory against the odds.
creating the Raj of Malabar, a Christian state on the subcontinent’s southwestern shore and the Maldives that swore allegiance to Nineveh but enjoyed a high degree of functional autonomy.
An important lodgement. Maybe the Raja will try some expansion of his own, though it could also get him into trouble and drag Assyria back in. Or provide a firm base for expansion, perhaps by a successor.
One of the Nestorian holy sites is in southern India - the others being Edessa, Jerusalem, Baghdad and Merv in eastern Persia. With just 2 under my control Nestorian moral authority was challengingly low for me to actually spread the faith within my own realm
Good reason then - thanks for the additional in-game insight.
Nehor has managed some incredible feats. Leading the Assyrian armies while under his brother's rule to defeat the Jihadi invasions, conquering all of Mesopotamia and now leading a remarkable Crusade to India. He's into his sixties now - we shall see if he will go into a quiet retirement or has more ambitions left to fulfil.
One suspects the only quiet he will see is once he shuffles off the mortal coil! Use him or lose him. ;)
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
With two distinct parts, you have a ready-made backup if one part goes sour. The navigation from the Persian Gulf to Southern India is not bad (I recently had northern Scotland/Croatia voyages). Thank you for sharing 'the Bear' with us.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Sharper Than A Serpent’s Tooth, To Have a Thankless Child – 1220-1246
Sharper Than A Serpent’s Tooth, To Have a Thankless Child – 1220-1246

1655240607488.png

While Assyria’s eyes were fixed on the adventuring of King Nahir in the St Thomas Crusade, tremendous instability was afflicting one of its most powerful neighbours. For a century and half many had held out hope that the schism of 1054, that had broken apart the unity of the Roman Church – leaving behind distinct Latin Catholic and Greek Orthodox churches, could be mended. In 1211 the Byzantine Emperor Konstantinos XI achieved just this – restoring full communion with the West. Yet unity came at a price, accepting the highest authority of the Pope in Rome, surrendering on key dogmatic principles and even recognising the Holy Roman Emperor as the successor to the Western Roman Emperors of old – equal and legitimate heirs to Rome’s legacy. This union proved itself hugely controversial among the Greeks themselves and in 1214, Konstantinos was overthrown by Theophlaktos – who promptly restored the independence of the Greek church. The religious ructions were not ended there, as the Pope called for a Crusade to restore Konstantinos to the imperial throne while the Byzantine Empire as whole descended into conflict centred around pro and anti union factions.

Although the anti-Catholic philhellene faction were ultimately victorious in the ensuing struggle, the chaos in Byzantium bled into the affairs of the wider Near East. The war worsened an existing tense relationship between the Byzantines and the Crusaders of the Levant, while also cooling the close relationship between Nineveh and Jerusalem as the experience of the Greeks filled many Nestorians with the fear that the Catholics might attempt to undermine the religious independence of their own church as well.

1655240627442.png

Upon returning to Assyria the old bear Nahir showed little inclination to retire in peace, continuing to wage military campaigns abroad through his sixties and into his seventies, displaying remarkable longevity. Through these years he fought the Armenians for territory around Edessa and the Arabs to push Assyrian power as far south as Amman. Yet the largest foreign conflict of these later years was not in the pursuit of new conquests, but to support the adoption of Nestorianism in the Persian Gulf. Emir Shaiban II, who ruled most of the southern shore of the Gulf, abandoned his Muslim in favour of the Church of the East in 1231, bringing many of his tribal brethren alongside him in this transition. Almost immediately he was beset by internal rebellion and invasion from his Muslim Arab neighbours – who all sought to topple him and restore Islamic control to the region. Spying an opportunity to extend Assyrian and Nestorian influence, Nahir led his armies in a series of campaigns to prop up the Emir and consolidate the Church of the East’s expansion into the Gulf – a key way station to Malabar in India.

1655240656230.png

A century on from the birth of Saint Ta’mhas’ Assyrian statelet in Samarra, his son’s realm was entering a period of cultural and economic change. Throughout its early decades, the Kingdom of Assyria had been a predominantly Muslim state with a sizeable Christian minority in which Kurds and Arabs both outnumbered the ruling Assyrians. Although this remained very much the case at the end of Nahir’s reign, there were some signs of change. Notably, a slow process of culture change was underway on the Plains of Nineveh, and in the cities of northern Mesopotamia – Islam, Arabic and Kurdish were slowly receding while the Syriac language and Nestorian faith were on the rise. Indeed, it was during this period that Aramean became the predominant language in Nineveh itself.

At the same time, the realm was growing increasingly prosperous. The lands of Mesopotamia were themselves agriculturally rich and enjoyed a sustained period of bountiful harvests and advantageous weather, but Assyria’s greatest improvements came in the field of commerce. Benefiting from an advantageous geographical position, Mesopotamia’s existing trading advantages were stretched further. For one, the area’s already large Jewish population grew significantly in light of the tolerant attitude of Saint Ta’mhas and his successors to their settlement – seeing Baghdad, Nineveh and Basra emerge as the centre of world Jewry and the heart of a nexus of international connections spread across the known world. Further to this, Assyria’s new links to southern India gave Mesopotamian merchants easy access to the bountiful riches of the Indian spice trade and key naval choke-point on the maritime route to the markets of the Far East.

1655240690378.png

For all his military glories and undoubted ability, King Nahir was always surrounded by many enemies throughout his life. There were those who doubted his religious convictions and suspected he still harboured heretical beliefs, those who feared his tendency towards cruel and arbitrary treatment of his inferiors and many who simply tired of the unending call to war. As had been the case for much of his reign, the Order of Saint Addai remained a hotbed of discontent in the King’s later years. Nahir had sought to exert greater control over the Order when he pushed for his second son Ta’mhas to be appointed as Grandmaster in 1223, following his return from India. Unfortunately for the King, it did not take long for Ta’mhas to be sucked into the dissenting culture of the Order and in 1230 he spearheaded a rebellion against his father. This revolt was swiftly and brutally dealt with by the elderly monarch. As his son pleaded for clemency, the betrayed father commanded that Ta’mhas be put to death. Taking on a practice he had witnessed in India, the Prince was to be executed by elephant – crushed to death under the feet of a mammoth beast taken back to Assyria from the St Thomas Crusade.

1655241052837.png

By 1230, already seventy three years old, King Nahir was ancient by medieval standards and the question of his inevitable impending demise ensured that the defeat and execution of Ta’mhas was merely the opening chapter in a period of instability. Unlike many western Kingdoms of the era, Assyria lacked a codified law of succession. The transitions that had followed the deaths of her first two monarchs had been smoothed by the informal direction of the departing King and the approval of both the Qatwa dynasty and the realm’s important magnates. Nahir lacked the same certainty his father and brother. The King’s favoured successor – his eldest son Avina – was seen as weak and overly close to his father and was unpopular with much of the Assyrian elite who favoured the grandson of King Niv by his eldest son Shovai – Nahir Bar Shovai.

Conflict was sparked in 1235 after King Nshir fell became bedridden with an illness. Expecting his impending death, both Avina and the younger Nahir assembled their forces to prepare for war. Although the elder Nahir recovered from this illness, the wheels of conflict were already well in motion, a civil war had begun. The old bear summoned his strength for one final conflict and in a blistering campaign destroyed the best part of the rebel army – advancing from Nineveh to Basra in the space of a few months and winning several major battles. Yet this would be the last act for the great King, who died in Basra in 1236, with the civil war still raging. At his death he was seventy eight years old, having reigned for thirty six years despite assuming the throne in middle age. Incredibly, a full one hundred and thirty eight years separated the birth of his father, Saint Ta’mhas, in 1098 and his own death in 1236

1655241032304.png

Although King Nahir had bequeathed a powerful position to his son, Avina lacked the martial talents of his father and his position soon worsened following his ascension to power. The rival faction regained their footing and pushed Avina towards a costly stalemate and a negotiated truce in 1238. The rebels accepted Avina’s Kingship, but in return the new sovereign named Nahir Bar Shovai as his successor. Assyria’s spate of infighting had allowed her rivals to prey upon her most vulnerable interests. In India, the Tamils had reclaimed the northern parts of Malabar, while in the Gulf the Shaiban Emirate that Nahir the Bear had fought so hard to support was destroyed by the invading Seljuk Turks.

1655240982058.png

Avina’s reign proved to be short and unfortunate. Lacking the strength of his father, Avina struggled to maintain control over his vassals. In 1242 the ever troublesome Order of Saint Addai provoked a war against the Byzantines over the city of Damascus, drawing the King into a war which he had not sought. Still suffering from prolonged internal turmoil, the Romans were not the power they once were but were nonetheless able to deploy a large force to Syria, confronting the Assyrian King at the Battle of Baalbek in 1243. There, King Avina was cut down by the Greeks, although his generals were ultimately able to force the Byzantines back. With the King’s death, his erstwhile rival ascended the throne as King Nahir II. Through this exchange of power the war in Syria continued, with Damascus falling after a long siege and the Byzantines struggling to mount an effective campaign to reclaim it. A peace was agreed in 1246 that transferred the important city over to Assyrian control.
 
  • 7Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
The old king is finally gone. Quite amazing the gap between Ta'mhas' birth and Nahir's death highlighted in the update - 136 years might be longest two-generation gap I've ever had in this game. The core reason was that Ta'mhas himself had a fairly long life and had his children late (Nahir was just 6 when his father died) and then of course Nahir himself was positively ancient by the end, still leading from the front right to his final curtain.

Perhaps this may even be the beginning of a future Assyrian dominance of India. With the support of a growing Nestorian community there, they could surely keep it going for centuries to come.
The Assyrians have saved fellow Christians in India...
Now I want total Assyrian control of India...

A lot of excitement for the possibilities in India! Holding on to these lands from the Hindu kingdoms in the region is going to be the hard part to begin with. But we shall have to wait and see if they prove to be the launching pad for something greater!

All caught up again. :) Followed the career of The Bear from its beginning to his triumph in India. The Assyrian-Nestorian angle is indeed an interesting one.
Wow - you certainly benefited from whatever short circuited that event chain, gaining a useable Boss++ character into the bargain.
He may be as mad as a cut snake in some respects, but this was a very wise choice.
Aha, a nice little teaser.
And so it proved - looks like maybe terrain, a big cavalry advantage and the Bear’s extraordinary military genius must have come into play there for the victory against the odds.
An important lodgement. Maybe the Raja will try some expansion of his own, though it could also get him into trouble and drag Assyria back in. Or provide a firm base for expansion, perhaps by a successor.
Good reason then - thanks for the additional in-game insight.
One suspects the only quiet he will see is once he shuffles off the mortal coil! Use him or lose him. ;)

Glad you had the chance to catch up :). I hope you enjoyed the career of the Bear! quite an incredible amount packed in for a single figure - the defender from the Jihad, conqueror of Baghdad and Basra, leader of a Crusade to India and then finding time to have his own rebellious son crushed to death by an elephant. As you predicted, he didn't rest under the very end - still leading armies in a civil war when he died. Quite the life! I can indeed thank my lucky stars for whatever combination gave me the high stats character but not the psycho-killer of the devil spawn event chain.

We shall have to wait and see how the Malabar Rajas fare under Assyrian tutelage. They have already lost a little of their starting territory. It will be challenging to expand on their own with the powerful Cholas in the neighbourhood, they may need some help from mother Assyria if they want to grow the Christian quarter of the subcontinent.

With two distinct parts, you have a ready-made backup if one part goes sour. The navigation from the Persian Gulf to Southern India is not bad (I recently had northern Scotland/Croatia voyages). Thank you for sharing 'the Bear' with us.

In this period of history people were making much longer and more treacherous voyages than from the Gulf to India, so it's perhaps not completely out of the question that an army might make this journey.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
An impressive reign. This new king seems to start well too. Future is bright. Surely, it will now all fall asounder...
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Big update. Too bad the Nestorian emirate in the Gulf didn't last. Brutal end for Ta'mhas (the younger). And, in the end, for all his successes, the Bear had one great failure: not securing an easy succession for his chosen heir.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Assyria has now expanded, but I fear that attacking Byzantium might be a bad idea. Who will they ally with against the Catholics now? The opponents of Catholicism within Christianity should stand united...
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Assyria will surely feel uncomfortable with the possibility of a Catholic crusade also in their lands, each time they prove to be less trustworthy. Why not before they attack us, seize their emplacements in jerusalem and break through to liberate our coptic brothers in egypt?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Upon returning to Assyria the old bear Nahir showed little inclination to retire in peace
Never doubted he would ;)
For one, the area’s already large Jewish population grew significantly in light of the tolerant attitude of Saint Ta’mhas and his successors to their settlement – seeing Baghdad, Nineveh and Basra emerge as the centre of world Jewry and the heart of a nexus of international connections spread across the known world.
Just out of interest, is this something drawn from an aspect of the game that can be identified, or more just skilful narrative extrapolation? I’m not experienced enough in CK2 to know.
As his son pleaded for clemency, the betrayed father commanded that Ta’mhas be put to death. Taking on a practice he had witnessed in India, the Prince was to be executed by elephant – crushed to death under the feet of a mammoth beast taken back to Assyria from the St Thomas Crusade.
A grim way to go, but that’s what you get.
Yet this would be the last act for the great King, who died in Basra in 1236, with the civil war still raging. At his death he was seventy eight years old, having reigned for thirty six years despite assuming the throne in middle age.
The Bear, baited one last time but still finding a victory …
the Battle of Baalbek in 1243. There, King Avina was cut down by the Greeks
… though not one his son could sustain.
I hope you enjoyed the career of the Bear!
Very much - what a military powerhouse and polymath he was. At least he helped get the Assyrian concern off to a strong start from a precarious beginning. Holding it together could prove challenging, though.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Nahir was truly an exceptional ruler. He will undoubtedly be missed as Assyria enters a period of instability and uncertainty.

We see the eternal paradoxical cycle manifest once more: A strong king is good for the realm's stability, yet the realm immediately collapses under his successors because his strength has allowed competing factions to get stronger as well under the surface even as the old king held the strength to keep them in balance himself. Avina might have been able to claw his way back to stability had he lived; bar Shovai might still have the overall support of the nobility, but it remains to be seen whether that means his reign will be any more successful.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1
Reactions:
It's been quite a while for me, but I'm glad to have found you again! Looking forward to seeing how this develops
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Thunder on the Steppe – 1246-1270
Thunder on the Steppe – 1246-1270

1656100196334.png

Throughout the history of civilisation the shifting patterns of power on the Eurasian Steppe had possessed the propensity to greatly reshape the world around them. In the thirteenth century one such moment of change was brought about by the emergence of the Mongol Empire. The tribes of the Far Eastern Steppe were united under a Great Khan at the very beginning of the century and proceeded to rapidly expand their domain – invading China and then surging westward all the way to the waters of the mighty Volga River.

Prior to this conquest, the Steppe had been a land of great religious diversity. Adherents to traditional pagan Tengri beliefs lived side by side with Nestorian, Orthodox and Catholic Christians, Sunni and Shia Muslims, Buddhists, Manicheans, Hindus, and Zoroastrians. The Great Khan sought to sweep all of this away, seeking to impose a single uniform faith based upon a reformed, more hierarchical, form of Tengrism across the diversity of his sprawling dominion. These religious policies had significant consequences. Notably, the new faith proved attractive to a large part of the indigenous Slavic population to the west of the Mongol realm, who had only embraced Christianity relatively recently, and where pagan customs remained widespread. Yet the largest impact was upon the Cumans. The most powerful force on the western Steppe prior to the Mongol conquest, the Turkic Cuman Confederation was predominantly made up of Christianised Turkic peoples who inhabited most of the lands between the Carpathians and the Aral Sea. As these tribes fell to the Mongols, their new masters offered a cold choice between conversion to Tengrism or death – setting off a mass migration of Cumans fleeing Mongol tyranny into the settled lands that surrounded them.

1656100175757.png

The largest part of the fleeing Cuman horde passed into fractured lands of the Byzantines, where they struck against both the Balkans and Anatolia. In the Balkans, the Cumans conquered much of the territory around the Danube River – establishing a string of principalities from Wallachia in the east to Serbia in the west in which the Turkic invaders massacred and enslaved the indigenous Slavic and Vlach populations. In Anatolia, they Cumans were more united, creating the powerful Kingdom of Charsianon in the centre of the peninsula, and beginning the process of Turkifying the region.

The last part of the Cuman migration affected Assyria. Cuman raiding and small scale attacks had begun in the early 1240s and increased in size, frequency and strength through the decade as the invaders noticed the distraction of Assyrian forces in the Damascene War against the Byzantines. Shortly after the conclusion of the conflict in Syria, Borc Khan, a leader of a large Catholic Cuman alliance, began a large scale invasion of Mesopotamia, taking with him not only many thousands of warriors but entire tribes with him as he sought land for settlement as his compatriots had done in the Byzantine Empire. The Cumans sowed frightening devastation across much of the region – sacking cities, torching villages and slaughtering civilians. Nonetheless, the remained in a stalemate, incapable of taking and holding territory within Assyria for prolonged periods, yet powerful enough to resist outright expulsion. As their campaign in Assyria ground on for years, King Nehor II made the fateful decision to come to terms with Khan Borc in 1257. The Cumans were to be granted land for settlement – predominantly in the foothills around the Kingdom’s northern and eastern frontiers – and in return their would swear allegiance to the Assyrian King and enter into his military service.

1656100147941.png

The settlement of Borc Khan’s Cumans on Assyrian soil was tremendously unpopular among high and low society alike. Not only did it invite a barbarous and heretical people, who had committed many atrocities during their invasions and remained prone to raiding neighbouring communities even after entering the King’s service, it forced thousands from their traditional homes, involved seizures of lands from factions of the nobility and a reorganisation of the realm’s military around the new Turkic component.

For the better part of the next decade Assyria was wracked by internal instability. In 1258 and then again in 1262, the Kingdom was hit by large peasant rebellions. More concerning for the integrity of royal power, a large anti-monarchical alliance emerged at court in Nineveh – yet again powered by the ever troublesome Order of Saint Addai, but featuring several key members of the upper nobility including the Maliks of Edessa and Samarra. These groups launched a major rebellion in 1264 – threatening to topple Nehor II by bringing Nineveh under siege. Fortunately for the King, his support held better in the south, and an army from Babylonia arrived to relieve him and assist him in driving the rebels back, restoring peace by 1267.

1656100114279.png

As order returned to the realm in the late 1260s, King Nehor’s attention turned towards dynastic politics. His wife, Maria ve Samosata, was the sister of the childless King Vakhtank of Armenia. As Vakhtank grew older and his health started to worsen, the question of the Armenian succession grew in prominence and controversy. Nehor and Maria’s son, Saad, was the King’s closest living male relative and as such had a clear claim to the crown. However, with many Armenia’s eager to avoid a union with their larger neighbour to the south, Vakhtank took to decision to revise his Kingdom’s laws of succession to exclude the female line – this removing Saad from the inheritance and naming his cousin Leo as his successor. Disputing the disinheritance of his son, Nehor invaded Armenia at the head of a larger army in 1270.

1656100069673.png

While Assyria was focussed on its efforts to bring the weaker state to heel, news was already beginning to reach the Middle East of a new force that would scatter all plans of Kings, Queens, clergy and commoners alike asunder.
 
  • 11Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
So in game explanation of the Cuman invasions and Mongols! The Mongols were fairly weak in this run through. They conquered most of the Eurasian Steppe, but did little to threaten the settled empires. Interestingly, they reformed Tengrism - and somehow successfully converted a couple of major Russian leaders to their new faith.

Interestingly, we did get some major invasions of the settled world - but from the Cumans rather than Mongols. By the second half of the 13th century they have not only invaded but settled and culturally converted a large part of the Danube region and western Balkans (essentially replacing the Serbs and much of the Vlach population in game) as well as a sizeable state in eastern Anatolia. In Assyria, in game I was facing devestating and continuous raids from large Cuman armies throughout this period, and then a prepared invasion from Borc. In game we manage to beat him back, but to represent the larger part Cumans are set to play going forward (and their in game impact on Assyria) I had described them as securing a partial settlement and entering the service of our army.

It is amazing how many leaders die in battles that their side will eventually win! Three king episode. Thank you for updating

Yes, part of me feels there should be a more devastating impact to losing your King in the middle of a war than the game simulates.

An impressive reign. This new king seems to start well too. Future is bright. Surely, it will now all fall asounder...

We got a short period of peace after that war with the Byzantines before the Cumans reared their ugly heads.

Big update. Too bad the Nestorian emirate in the Gulf didn't last. Brutal end for Ta'mhas (the younger). And, in the end, for all his successes, the Bear had one great failure: not securing an easy succession for his chosen heir.

I couldn't resist using the in game description and linking it up with Nehor's adventures in India to have his execution go this way!

Nehor lived for such a long time, the easy succession was perhaps doubly difficult to secure. Sadly for him, he was unable to keep secure his direct line on the throne in the longer term. Assyria could perhaps used a better reformed law of succession!

Assyria has now expanded, but I fear that attacking Byzantium might be a bad idea. Who will they ally with against the Catholics now? The opponents of Catholicism within Christianity should stand united...

With most of the Cumans Catholics as well, Rome's noose is starting to look a little tighter around our necks now. We will have to wait and see if this becomes a greater issue going forward.

Assyria will surely feel uncomfortable with the possibility of a Catholic crusade also in their lands, each time they prove to be less trustworthy. Why not before they attack us, seize their emplacements in jerusalem and break through to liberate our coptic brothers in egypt?

I won't spoil anything just yet, but although we have not heard much from the Holy Land in this last update - we will return to this region again before the century is out!

Never doubted he would ;)

Just out of interest, is this something drawn from an aspect of the game that can be identified, or more just skilful narrative extrapolation? I’m not experienced enough in CK2 to know.

A grim way to go, but that’s what you get.

The Bear, baited one last time but still finding a victory …

… though not one his son could sustain.

Very much - what a military powerhouse and polymath he was. At least he helped get the Assyrian concern off to a strong start from a precarious beginning. Holding it together could prove challenging, though.

In terms of the Jewish population. In game, my courts were always full of large numbers of Jewish characters in this play through and I received a number of related events about us prospering from international commercial/technological connections through our Jewish community. Which is the origin of that aspect of the story. I would envision Mesopotamia being the beating heart of the world Jewish population at this point in history.

Nehor the Bear was truly a grand character and has secured a very strong position indeed for Assyria. We are entering into an unstable period now, with perhaps weaker leadership than we had in the preceding century. Let us see how Assyria makes it out the other end!

Nahir was truly an exceptional ruler. He will undoubtedly be missed as Assyria enters a period of instability and uncertainty.

We see the eternal paradoxical cycle manifest once more: A strong king is good for the realm's stability, yet the realm immediately collapses under his successors because his strength has allowed competing factions to get stronger as well under the surface even as the old king held the strength to keep them in balance himself. Avina might have been able to claw his way back to stability had he lived; bar Shovai might still have the overall support of the nobility, but it remains to be seen whether that means his reign will be any more successful.

Nehor II's reign has certainly been something of a mixed bag to date, if we are being charitable. He ended the war with the Byzantines to secure Damascus, but then failed to fully expel the invading Cumans - settling for a destablising compromise with them. We shall see if he has success in his quest to secure control over Armenia before the frightening rumbles from the east arrive on our doorstep.

After stumbling into the Jewish Poland AAR rather late, I'll hope that this AAR has a better fate than the Persian one!

Glad to have you abroad, and I hope so too!

It's been quite a while for me, but I'm glad to have found you again! Looking forward to seeing how this develops

Glad to have you on for another journey. :)
 
  • 3
  • 2Like
Reactions:
The Pale Horseman rides undefeated. With holdings in India and at the center of the trade route, every epidemic will follow a well-paved path to Assyria. AI doing Reformed Tengrism throws a monkey-wrench into the game as do the Catholic Cumans. Thank you for protecting us from Rome's excesses.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
Cumans, Mongols, rebel scum and now a new enemy far deadlier than any of those is about to rear its ugly head. The plague comes for everybody, hopefully the Assyrians can wither this storm. Especially since that very juicy potential union with Armenia could prove fruitful.
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
The Black Death approaches.

These Cumans seem like a large threat to eastern civilization. Will they prove a threat to Assyria? After all, this scenario reminds me of the Normans and the French, and we all know how that ended... Cuman Assyrian Empire?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
If the son dies of the plague, that would be unfortunate…
 
  • 1
  • 1Like
Reactions:
They are not a problem now, but maybe in the future, what a shame if a Cuman empire (nothing like the Ottomans!) unified with its cousins from Serbia, Wallachia and Anatolia and then looked for its brothers in Assyria.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: