Also these are some research paper that I could find though I lack the experience to derive much results from these-
(This has the location of nearly 36 Garhs)
(This has the location of nearly 36 Garhs)
No, I'm just a student lol, though history has always been a hobby of mine.God damn man! You just began to look into this subject and already found a new paper! Are you by any chance a professional historian?
I will try to make this into a map.I compiled all the known locations of Garhs in Uttarakhand in this google earth project, which might be helpful in making locations for the region.
Google Earth
earth.google.com
What I did was take a map off of David Rumsey's catalogue, traced it then added on to it with help from books. I used layers in paint.net.Sorry, due to a family emergency I was busy for quite some time. Can any one point to me in a general direction on how I could make a map?
Prior to Ajaypal there is very little record about the Garhwal region ,in fact the name of Garhwal is also accredited to ajay pal . .From the inscriptions of the khas malla kings ,there is a mention of crown prince ashokchalla governing over the Jalandhar state(kumaon-gadhwal) as per the royal order.The khasas were still influential and started loosing control over vassals during the reign of Abhaya malla i.e around 1391AD.There is also mention of abhyaya malla subduing Doti after a rebellion .So i think it is safe to assume that Garhwal was also a feudatory of khasas in 1337AD.Hello! I am back! Finally finished the book "Garhwal ka Itihaas". After my last post, there was not much content that could be incorporated in the game, so not much information this time. (I could not make the map as I am stupid, please somebody else do it. paint.net refuses to load for me and many more reasons.)
For the time being here are some pictures that were included in the book. All of these are black and white though.
View attachment 1172431
Map of Garhwal during the reign of Ajay Pal.
View attachment 1172432
State amblem of Garhwal
View attachment 1172433
Another map of Garhwal.
Yes there is. Although I would disagree with you here on the timeline. After the fall of Katyuris. which we can definitely assume to be Khasas, Chands took power in the Kumaon region and the Garhwal region, where most of these Garhs were established by Katyuris, became independent. In the book, there is the mention of Ashokchalla but it seems that although he did conquer the region, atleast up top Gopeshwar where his "edict" on the Trishul is but also quickly lost control of the region too.Prior to Ajaypal there is very little record about the Garhwal region ,in fact the name of Garhwal is also accredited to ajay pal . .From the inscriptions of the khas malla kings ,there is a mention of crown prince ashokchalla governing over the Jalandhar state(kumaon-gadhwal) as per the royal order.The khasas were still influential and started loosing control over vassals during the reign of Abhaya malla i.e around 1391AD.There is also mention of abhyaya malla subduing Doti after a rebellion .So i think it is safe to assume that Garhwal was also a feudatory of khasas in 1357AD.
The katyuri who ruled over Garhwal ,kumaon and western Nepal also were khasas .I also think that the ajay pal were also khasas.
Is there anything related to these in the book?
Well i was supposed to write 1337ad not 1357 ad. What specifically do you disagree about the timeline besides the one i corrected? Most of the history of the himalayas are limited. The eastern and northern border of khasas can be easily verified by crossing with Tibetan and Malla (then Nepal mandala) sources. But i couldn't find much regarding how long the western region lasted under their rule .There is record of loosing the khari Pradesh(ngari regions) and the gradual disintegration of kingdom.Khasas were pretty strong especially in 1337 under punya malla .Can you cite the source that claim they had quickly lost the control of the region?Yes there is. Although I would disagree with you here on the timeline. After the fall of Katyuris. which we can definitely assume to be Khasas, Chands took power in the Kumaon region and the Garhwal region, where most of these Garhs were established by Katyuris, became independent. In the book, there is the mention of Ashokchalla but it seems that although he did conquer the region, atleast up top Gopeshwar where his "edict" on the Trishul is but also quickly lost control of the region too.
In 1337, Garhwal was not yet united and was divided into nearly 48 petty fiefdoms. Please take a look at my previous comments as I have posted quite a few details on there.Well i was supposed to write 1337ad not 1357 ad. What specifically do you disagree about the timeline besides the one i corrected? Most of the history of the himalayas are limited. The eastern and northern border of khasas can be easily verified by crossing with Tibetan and Malla (then Nepal mandala) sources. But i couldn't find much regarding how long the western region lasted under their rule .There is record of loosing the khari Pradesh(ngari regions) and the gradual disintegration of kingdom.Khasas were pretty strong especially in 1357 under punya malla .Can you cite the source that claim they had quickly lost the control of the region?