• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

JKiller96

Court Imam
Moderator
111 Badges
Feb 17, 2013
1.077
1.937
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Stellaris: Ancient Relics
  • Victoria 2
  • Hearts of Iron 4: Arms Against Tyranny
  • War of the Roses
  • War of the Vikings
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Humble Paradox Bundle
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Knights of Pen and Paper 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mandate of Heaven
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Crusader Kings II: Monks and Mystics
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • BATTLETECH
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Mass Transit
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Cities: Skylines - Green Cities
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Cities: Skylines - Natural Disasters
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Imperator: Rome Deluxe Edition
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Golden Century
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Steel Division: Normandy 44
  • Cities: Skylines - Parklife
  • Stellaris: Distant Stars
  • Steel Division: Normandy 44 Deluxe Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: Dharma
  • Surviving Mars
  • Shadowrun Returns
  • Shadowrun: Dragonfall
  • Age of Wonders: Planetfall
Here are just a few thoughts, suggestions on some additions to India in a future patch... Which I know will come.. One day..

First, some province changes... Country by country;

Southern India

1. Malabar - South Kanara currently held by Malabar should belong to Vijayanagar in 1444 as the Vijayanagar held Mangalore.
This would make Malabar a 1 province country, except the province of Malabar should be split into Kozhikode (Calicut) and Malappuram. Malappuram was a regional capital south of Kozhikode for Malabar, and splitting the province in half would be easily done.

2. Kochin - Kochin should be renamed to Kochi (Both the country and the province)

3. Venad - Nothing, except Travancore should also have cores on Venad and Kochi(n)

4. Add Lakshadweep as an uncolonized province north of the Maldives

5. Bahmanis - I still support the changing of the name of the Bahmanis to Bahmanids!


Bahmani Localization
Used Kannada and Muslim regime name changes as base-
Bidar - Muhammadabad
Gulbarga - Ahsanabad
Pune - Punawadi
Marathwada - Daulatabad
Goa - Gove
South Konkan - Dabul
Bijapur - Bijapura
Raichur Doab - Rayacuru
Golconda - Golkonda
Warangal - Sultanpur (Should be shared with Delhi Sultanate)
Kurnool - Karnul
Rayalaseema - Relasima
Arcot - Arkot
Mysore - Maisuru
Madurai - Madhurai
South Kanara - Mangaluru (Or Dakshina Kenara)
North Kanara - Uttara Kenara

Western India/Rajputana - TBC

1. Sind - Rename Sind to Sindh... I've mentioned this many times..
Sindhi National Ideas

2. Baluchistan - Rename Baluchistan to the actual historical entity Kalat or Qalat

3. Makran - Split off from Baluchistan (Which is now called Kalat) This state would be ruled by the Rind dynasty and was independent in 1444.

More to come! @Trin Tragula
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
As always we are happy to see map suggestions! I realize these likely take some time both to look into and write up and we really appreciate that this forum has so much activity despite that :)

Some pointers for what we look for that I’ve mostly posted before but can be repeated:

*In general when posting suggestion for ownership changes please add a reference of some kind. This is a good way for a suggestion to be lent more credence (or at least to be evaluated based on what you used to make it if/when we look at it).
In this particular case I am pretty confident in the ownership of the Konkan coast up to the 1480s so I would want a reference to see what we might have missed for instance.

*When you suggest breaking up a tag suggesting what to do with all its constituent parts helps a lot for the same reason. There is always a reason a conglomorated tag exists in the first place and if that is not addressed we could not break it up.
In this case there are a whole bunch of states in eastern Baluchistan in the timeline but at our start I only know of the Rinds, and so they are who currently rule that tag.
For western baluchistan we have overall very little data.:)
There are other examples elsewhere in the world even if we are cutting down on them as soon as we can.

Mind this is not necessarily the only reason for such tags though, but any suggestion to break one up should try to look to the full picture :)

*Likewise when adding revolters. Venad and Travancore are the same state but you likely have a reason for wanting one as a revolter, if it’s not in your post we could only guess what it was however :)

Also: that’s not where cannanore is even if they did often control the lakhadives ;)
 
As always we are happy to see map suggestions! I realize these likely take some time both to look into and write up and we really appreciate that this forum has so much activity despite that :)

Some pointers for what we look for that I’ve mostly posted before but can be repeated:

*In general when posting suggestion for ownership changes please add a reference of some kind. This is a good way for a suggestion to be lent more credence (or at least to be evaluated based on what you used to make it if/when we look at it).
In this particular case I am pretty confident in the ownership of the Konkan coast up to the 1480s so I would want a reference to see what we might have missed for instance.

*When you suggest breaking up a tag suggesting what to do with all its constituent parts helps a lot for the same reason. There is always a reason a conglomorated tag exists in the first place and if that is not addressed we could not break it up.
In this case there are a whole bunch of states in eastern Baluchistan in the timeline but at our start I only know of the Rinds, and so they are who currently rule that tag.
For western baluchistan we have overall very little data.:)
There are other examples elsewhere in the world even if we are cutting down on them as soon as we can.

Mind this is not necessarily the only reason for such tags though, but any suggestion to break one up should try to look to the full picture :)

*Likewise when adding revolters. Venad and Travancore are the same state but you likely have a reason for wanting one as a revolter, if it’s not in your post we could only guess what it was however :)

Also: that’s not where cannanore is even if they did often control the lakhadives ;)
I was under the assumption that the Lakshadweep was under the control of different kingdoms based in mainland India, but now I'm starting to think that it'd be better as an uncolonized province.. For Baluchistan it seems colossal when it wasn't that unified, making it seperate into Makran and Kalat, which each became recognizable states of their own. Kalat should probably be representing the Brahui of the region, and Makran the Rind. According to Wiki (I hate to say that as a source, but it's late for researching) the Mirwari Brahui had control of Kalat in this period. For the Konkan, but I cannot figure out where the actual line of control was in 1444, Goa was the last place to be reconquered in 1469, but exact dates for others are far-flung. So I will revoke that suggestion.
 
This is a huge topic and and ample room for improvement, but to what extent PDX is willing to add tags. For example there is provision for Bahamani successor states in EU4, (Berar, Golconda, Bijapur, Ahmednagar, Bidar) there is no similar provision for Vijayanagar Nayak successor states (Senji, Tanjore, Madura, Ikkeri, though Mysore and Kheladi can be seen.) Also even though there are cossacks as DLC, there is no provision for rivalry between different factions within nobility and succession crisis. These are things that kept making the breaking kingdoms within India throughout the period be it south or North, Tughlaq or Aurangzeb. So EU4 is just not able to model even 10% of history here, Bahamans who should be weaker by 1520s, keep going strong, I see all sultanates infact there going stronger, no Mughals, so no rivalry between old muslim nobility and new Mughals and so no important tags like Sur empire. (a landmark in Indian history).

Regionalism has always been very strong in India, even if Gujarat takes over Malwa, they are not able to keep it for a decade, even if Malwa takes over Mewar, they find it difficult to control, even if Mewar takes over Malwa, they have to unwillingly return it, even if Vijayanagar is crushed in Talikota, the deccan states find themselves unable to rule over those lands and just walk away giving rise to several Nayaks. Even if Mughals are mighty, Bengal is semi-independent and be it Tughlaq of Delhi or Aurangzeb, once they try to control all of South sitting in Delhi, they are forced to leave their capital in North to a temporary one the South and then watch their empires slowly slipping away from them. Even in later days Marathas had to confine themselves as confederacy. Though one may argue nationalism was not a thing of that era - in India respective regions had strong sense of "regional-nationalism" which even is very true to this day.

The thing is can PDX try creating something in this direction where the strong indigenous cultural identities always removed the shackles of foreign yolk be it Sultanates, Mughals & even Maratha in non-Marathi land and in the end giving rise to a number of smaller regional states. One can simply see the number of princey states in the British India, and many had already been assimilated wrongly through the doctrine of lapse. These will make room for Mughals to form, remain stable so far they are managing well and an extreme expanse can set things to crumble and reformation of states. There is a need for more tags and stronger cultural identities. That will also keep smaller multiple states for Europeans to come and play their diplomacy. Diplomatic depths and disasters and opportunities, roles for traders and companies.

Coming to OP's comment first with name: The names in India for a particular place has many a times been too transitory, X in the reign of XX and Y in the reign in YY. I suggest to stick to the British version for simplicity and same place will have half a dozen names in the period. Some names does give a wrong approach such as, Marathawada & Rayalseema, these both are pure geographic terms like coromandel or Konkan. The suggestion here for Marathawada its Daulatanad, well Daulatabad was an important city during 1300s but by 1400-1500 the Aurangabad (just 30 Km from Daullatabad) had become more prominent. Suggestions for North & South Kanara are just translations.

The Goa case - Under Bahamans in 1350 AD, Under Vijayanagar from 1370 onwards, re-conquested by Gulbarga (Bahamans) in 1469 and under Bijapur from 1492, onwards then to the Portuguese from 1510.

Malabar:
By the turn of the 15th century, there were three prominent kingdoms in Malabar: (i) Kolathunad or Cannanore (north of Calicut, from Netravati river in the north to Korafipuzha in the south, ruled by Kolathiris); (ii) Kozhikode or Calicut (between the Kolathiri kingdom in the north to the Tiruvadi kingdom in the south, ruled by the Zamorin) and, (iii) Venad or Travancore (from Quilon in the nolth to Cape Comorin in the south). Besides, (iv) Cochin was the emerging state. (Kochi is Malayalam version of the British cochin).

Malabar polity was perpetual warfare between Kolathunad and Kozhikode; and between the latter and Cochin (Nayar) rajas. Both, Kolathunad and Cochin (Kshatriya) rajas claimed superior lineage. Besides these four major rulers, there existed a number of small chiefs/Rajas of Tanur, Crannganore, Mangat, Idappalli, Vedakkurnkur, Procaud, Kayamkulam and Quilon. The rajas of Cranganore, Idappalli and Vedakkumkur were subordinated to Calicut. The socio-political structure of Kerala was such that often the rajas held rights & property in each other's territory. Thus, in the Malabar political structure there was enough room for extra-territorial claims. For example, Calicut had many rights over the temples of Cochin and Travancore. Similarly, there were many rajas who were not subordinate to Calicut but they exercised authority over many temples in the Zamorins territory. A ground already set for the Portuguese to play its part.

North Konkan (Sangameshwar) should be a tag on its own where Bahamans will lead a failed expedition in 1446.

Edit:
South Kanara (better Tulunadu) should belong to Vijayanagar (1345-1554). Then to Kheladi.
North Kanara should be a separate tag "Gerassopa" under Vijayanagar.
 
Last edited:
Something that really irritates me is that Indian ruler and general names are not religion-specific. As a Hindu Bengali, I wanted to create a Hindu Bengal. But I honestly didn't feel like playing once I realized that my king was 'Maharaja' Ghiyat-ad-din Jalal Ilyas Shahi. My advisors had names like 'Firuz Ghosh' (Muslim first name + Hindu last name), which you would never hear in real life. These Muslim names are Persian and not Bengali. An idea could be to make the primary culture of Bengal and the culture of its rulers Persian, and remove the Persian names from the Bengali culture namelist. I haven't played the other sultanates, but I'm sure this is a similar problem for Jaunpur, Delhi, Bahmanis and maybe even Gujarat.

Another problem is that Indian nations are far too stable, making it ahistorically easy to unite the subcontinent and prevent European colonization. There should be some sort of mechanic which would make it possible to for revolting nations to occur in-game, replicating real-life rebellions such as those of Sher Shah Suri, Hemu and Shivaji.
There should also be some mechanics to help European nations to get a foothold into India, which I've never seen happening in-game except for Portugal getting Goa by event. In real life, even countries like Denmark had land in India.

There should also be major changes to the Indian provinces - something is definitely wrong when Ireland, with like 1% of Bengal's population, has more provinces. The province of 'Bengal Delta' is a really generic name, akin to if there were a 'Rhine Delta' province in the Netherlands. And I, someone living in West Bengal, have literally never heard of the provinces 'Barind' or 'Lakhnor'. The provinces should roughly correspond to the divisions of Bangladesh + the districts of West Bengal (Though many cities in West Bengal such as Kolkata, Malda and Murshidabad did not exist during this time period). Bordhoman/Burdwan is a particularly large omission. I'll do some research and offer some more suggestions about the provinces tomorrow.
 
Something that really irritates me is that Indian ruler and general names are not religion-specific. As a Hindu Bengali, I wanted to create a Hindu Bengal. But I honestly didn't feel like playing once I realized that my king was 'Maharaja' Ghiyat-ad-din Jalal Ilyas Shahi. My advisors had names like 'Firuz Ghosh' (Muslim first name + Hindu last name), which you would never hear in real life. These Muslim names are Persian and not Bengali. An idea could be to make the primary culture of Bengal and the culture of its rulers Persian, and remove the Persian names from the Bengali culture namelist. I haven't played the other sultanates, but I'm sure this is a similar problem for Jaunpur, Delhi, Bahmanis and maybe even Gujarat.

Another problem is that Indian nations are far too stable, making it ahistorically easy to unite the subcontinent and prevent European colonization. There should be some sort of mechanic which would make it possible to for revolting nations to occur in-game, replicating real-life rebellions such as those of Sher Shah Suri, Hemu and Shivaji.
There should also be some mechanics to help European nations to get a foothold into India, which I've never seen happening in-game except for Portugal getting Goa by event. In real life, even countries like Denmark had land in India.

There should also be major changes to the Indian provinces - something is definitely wrong when Ireland, with like 1% of Bengal's population, has more provinces. The province of 'Bengal Delta' is a really generic name, akin to if there were a 'Rhine Delta' province in the Netherlands. And I, someone living in West Bengal, have literally never heard of the provinces 'Barind' or 'Lakhnor'. The provinces should roughly correspond to the divisions of Bangladesh + the districts of West Bengal (Though many cities in West Bengal such as Kolkata, Malda and Murshidabad did not exist during this time period). Bordhoman/Burdwan is a particularly large omission. I'll do some research and offer some more suggestions about the provinces tomorrow.
It would be nice to get some sources from native speakers, I doubt Paradox has someone that can read all these different Indian languages
 
Something that really irritates me is that Indian ruler and general names are not religion-specific. As a Hindu Bengali, I wanted to create a Hindu Bengal. But I honestly didn't feel like playing once I realized that my king was 'Maharaja' Ghiyat-ad-din Jalal Ilyas Shahi. My advisors had names like 'Firuz Ghosh' (Muslim first name + Hindu last name), which you would never hear in real life. These Muslim names are Persian and not Bengali. An idea could be to make the primary culture of Bengal and the culture of its rulers Persian, and remove the Persian names from the Bengali culture namelist. I haven't played the other sultanates, but I'm sure this is a similar problem for Jaunpur, Delhi, Bahmanis and maybe even Gujarat.
.

This has been raised earlier in the forum, PDX should realise that there are a few things where there can be a thin line between being funny and being offending.

https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...-religion-culture-incongruence-india.1060985/

Lakhnaur was the capital of the governor of Bengal during the early Sultanate days. (Gajpati Kings Chronicles). But it leads to another confusion, it should be in the central Bengal then - with another name Lakhanauti or Gaur.

Barind is a pure geographic term like Doab, Rayalaseema, Marathwada, Coromandel, Konkan....
 
Lahknor and Lakhnaur are different places. Like many of the place names in eu it’s not a current term :)

Ruler and advisor names in eu are not in any way related to culture but are listed per country and this causes the problems you are seeing.
As for Bengal Delta, that name is what it is because there are so many important cities within that province, depending on the start date the capital of that province changes to reflect that (try later starts if you want to see it). By all means if you have a more relevant regional name we are interested in that.
It is also a province that could easily be broken in more pieces if we do an Indian map revision at some point but given the concentration of important cities I have a feeling the name would be hard to replace entirely.
 
Yes you are right about Lakhnor, just looked a text book....

15th century Bengal.png



Screen Shot 2018-03-21 at 12.27.43 PM.png


A difference of some 250 odd years, there are changes in the river flow.
 
Last edited:
Lakhnor should be renamed 'Rarh' and moved westwards. A province 'Bardhaman' should be between Rarh and Gaur. Bishnupur was also important and could be made a province.

Northern Bengal Delta can be made into the provinces of Hooghly and Calcutta (even though it wasn't a major city at the start of the game). The southern part of the state can keep its name. The province of Nadia/Nabadwip should also be added; it was extremely important in history as the Battle of Plassey in which Britain conquered Bengal occurred here.

The Sundarbans should be moved westwards. The in-game province is where Barisal should be.

Barind could be split between Malda/Pandua and Rangpur.

Tripura is actually in Mizoram in-game. It should be moved westwards. The province of Comilla should be made from Dhaka and could even be cored or owned by Tripura. (Though, if it is owned by Tripura, it should not be coastal as Bengal would then be divided into two)

Sikkim should be carved out from Koch, Limbuwan and Bhutan.

Damin should be renamed to Santhal
 
This is a huge topic and and ample room for improvement, but to what extent PDX is willing to add tags. For example there is provision for Bahamani successor states in EU4, (Berar, Golconda, Bijapur, Ahmednagar, Bidar) there is no similar provision for Vijayanagar Nayak successor states (Senji, Tanjore, Madura, Ikkeri, though Mysore and Kheladi can be seen.)

If you have suggestions for Nayak kingdoms we'd love to have them. Especially for the many small ones in the inland it was very hard to find good data during AoW (I know this as I was the one to do the rework at that time).
As for how many tags we could or could not add, those are things for us to worry about, the suggestions forum is here to give us ideas :)
 
With three provinces, Bihar is in a much worse position than Bengal. Magadha should definitely be made into a province (it was extremely important in history, containing the Buddhist, Jain and Hindu holy site of Gaya). Darbhanga and Purnia should also be added.
 
Lakhnor should be renamed 'Rarh' and moved westwards. A province 'Bardhaman' should be between Rarh and Gaur. Bishnupur was also important and could be made a province.

Northern Bengal Delta can be made into the provinces of Hooghly and Calcutta (even though it wasn't a major city at the start of the game). The southern part of the state can keep its name. The province of Nadia/Nabadwip should also be added; it was extremely important in history as the Battle of Plassey in which Britain conquered Bengal occurred here.

The Sundarbans should be moved westwards. The in-game province is where Barisal should be.

Barind could be split between Malda/Pandua and Rangpur.

Tripura is actually in Mizoram in-game. It should be moved westwards. The province of Comilla should be made from Dhaka and could even be cored or owned by Tripura. (Though, if it is owned by Tripura, it should not be coastal as Bengal would then be divided into two)

Sikkim should be carved out from Koch, Limbuwan and Bhutan.

Damin should be renamed to Santhal
Rahr is again a geographical term.
But I agree with all the other suggestions.
Tripura should extend to Comilla (to the the eastern bank of Padma river has been suggested much earlier in one to the thread).
Damin as Santhal is better.
In Bihar, Patna be named to Maghadh, Purnea be carved out from Bhagalpur.

There is a district-wise break-up thread about India.

https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/foru...res-a-reference-for-devs-enthusiasts.1015793/
 
If you have suggestions for Nayak kingdoms we'd love to have them. Especially for the many small ones in the inland it was very hard to find good data during AoW (I know this as I was the one to do the rework at that time).
As for how many tags we could or could not add, those are things for us to worry about, the suggestions forum is here to give us ideas :)
Is it possible to add factions to nobility, if it is done India can fall in its place. The faction if not handled properly could lead to potential civil war like pretenders and different nobility faction can carve out state on its own. I see many problems being solved.

So you don't need pretenders right from 1444 in Delhi but, you have a high influence of Afghan faction within nobility that gives rise to pretenders in a year or two and then Lodis come to actual scene. A faction in Bahamani kingdom Afaqi vs Daccani nobles who would tear the kingdom into 5 states, factions in Nayak nobles who could carve independent Nayak states. These factions should be manageable and there should be events to make them away from equilibrium. I am asking for more diplomatic and political depth. As of now our only reliance is culture based revolts which isn't working in India. Off late I am seeing better Timurids but as a nice model there should be succession and factionalism and opportunities, making and breaking of tags within too stable sultanates. These factions will also help to form Sur empire once Mughals are formed (Afghan faction vs Turkmen-mongol faction) of course this tag need be added, but I see it has potential here.

Anyway I am not sure how much help I can be about South Indian History where data are really scanty due lack of suitable text books at my hand right now and moreover, there is so much love for Mughal Moon that many stars simply fail to get attention by historians and Nayak states are one of such case. Many historians approach their text book through Mughal & Sultanate perspective and this leads to the negligence of many important local level politics which actually shape things to their many bewildering unexplained topics. I have tried to put something on Nayaks and would be happy help on any specification you may like to know. Though It has become a lengthy read.

The Nayankara system was an important characteristic of the Vijaynagar political organisation. The military chiefs or warriors held the title of Nayaka or Amaranayaka. Historians sometimes regard the nayakas simply as agents of the central government. The Vijaynagar inscriptions and the later Mackenzie manuscripts refer to the nayakas as territorial magnates with political aspirations which at times conflicted with the aim of the rulers. Amaranayanka was a designation conferred on a military officer or chief (nayaka) who had under his control a specified number of troops. They possessed revenue rights over land or territory called amaram (amaramakara or amaramahali). Nayakas before 1565 (Talikota) were military leaders holding military fiefs. These commanders of Vijaynagar army later established independent nayaka kingdoms. It should also be noted that the Vijaynagar rulers exercised direct territorial sovereignty over the Tungabhadra region only while in other parts, the Vijaynagar rulers exercised ritual sovereignty (overlordsip) through the Nayaks. Most of the coastal Andhra were under Reddy Nayaks while the most of the Tamil Nadu was under three Nayaks - of Senji, Madura & Tanjore.


Also referred to as Gingee or Jinji. The kingdom of Senji (along eastern coast from Palar in the north to Coleroon in the south) under a nayak seems to have originated during Krishnadevaraya's reign. One of the Jesuit letters of 1606 states that Nayak of Senji was the most powerful of the other two (Tanjore & Madura) and besides other feudatories, they had three prominent feudatory chief - 1. The Prince of Tiruvari (on the Gadilam river); 2. The Salavacha or Solaga of Tivakottai at the mouth of the Coleroon; and 3. The Nayak of Vellore.

Till 1592, all the nayaks of Senji remained loyal to Vijaynagar. However, the Vijaynagar ruler, Venkata I shifted his capital after 1592 from Penukonda to Chandragiri in order to strengthen Vijaynagar's hold over the nayaks. This gave rise to resentment among the nayaks as they expected Vijaynagar's interference in their internal affairs. (This was the main reason for frequent evasion of payment of tribute by the nayaks to Vijaynagar which ultimately led to civil war after Venkata 1's death in 1614.) One instance of such interference is that the nayak of Vellore, who was subordinate to Senji Nayak, was encouraged by Venkata I to disregard the latter's authority. Venkata I followed the policy of 'divide and rule' to weaken the nayaks of various tracts within the Empire. All this led the nayak of Vellore and Senji to rebel (sometime after 1600). Later, Vellore and Senji were taken over by Venkata I (1600-1608).

It is undisputedly believed that Koneri Dynasty ruled over Senji earlier, which was taken over by Vijayanagar and put under governorship of the Nayak’s formally from 1464 when Venkatapati Nayak became the first nayak ruler. There is some confusion regards the actual line of the Senji Nayak as different sources are giving a different information but texts at hand has advocated for the Mackenzie manuscripts which is as below:

1464-1476 - Venkatpati Nayak
1476-1490 - Vaiyappa Nayak
1490-1520 - Tubaki Krishnappa Nayaka (also called Bala / Vala Krishnappa)
1520-1540 - Achyuta Vijaya Ramachandra Nayak
1540-1550 - Muthialu Nayak
1570-1600 - Venkatappa Nayak
1600-1620 - Varadappa Nayak
Appa Nayak - up to Muslim conquest. (1650s)

The Senji Nayak kingdom when established covered most of Northern Tamil Nadu including the present day Chennai, Puducherry and vast areas of Nellore, Chittoor, Vellore and Chandragiri. Its Southern boundary extended up to Kollidam River which marked the boundary between the Tanjore and Madurai kingdoms. Later, during mid 16th centuries, the Senji Nayaks lost control of the Vellore Fort and its Northern provinces when their erstwhile Vijayanagara overlords under Aravidu Dynasty took possession of these places and re-established their later Kingdom.

With the demise of the Chola Dynasty in 1279, Thanjavur (modern Tanjore and North Arcot) was ruled by a branch of Chola dynasty, until the Vijayanagara Empire conquered all of South India by the late 14th century. The Vijayanagar rulers installed viceroys to rule over various parts of the empire. In 1532 CE, Achutya Deva Raya of Vijayanagar granted Sevappa Nayak, the governor of Thanjavur, permission to establish a feudatory kingdom following his Southern Campaigns against last Chola ruler. The nayak of Tanjore remained loyal to Vijaynagar throughout the 16th century. They always sided with the Empire in its battles. For example, they helped Venkata I against Golkonda invasion and this loyalty continued till Venkata I’s death in 1614.

Sevappa Nayak (1532-1580) - Chevvappa Nayak a.k.a. Sevappa Nayak was the first Thanjavur Nayak king. He was the son of Timmappa Nayak, a Vijayanagara viceroy in the Arcot region from his wife Bayyambika. Sevappa's wife Murtimamba was the sister-in-law of Achyuta Deva Raya and the sister of the Vijayanagara Queen, Thirumalamba. Some sources suggest that Sevappa acquired the Thanjavur Kingdom as stridhana (dowry) from Achyutadeva Raya.

Achuthappa Nayak (1560–1614) - Co-ruled with his father under the Yuvaraja title till 1580 is said to be deeply religious and well considered a master in the art of warfare. His minister was Govind Dikhsitar, was a great scholar and a shrewd administrator. His long reign of 54 years was of comparative peace apart from the internal struggles enabling him to contribute much to spiritual and public utility development. After battle of Talikota when the Nayaks of Senji & Madurai intended to break free from Vijayanagar and refused to pay tribute, Tanjore sided with the overlord Vijayanagar (now capital at Chandragiri) and defeated Madurai.
Helped King of Jaffna in successfully repelling Portuguese advances through many battles.
He also provided land grants to the new Italian settlers who escaped the Seize of Malta by the Ottoman Empire with the demand of their conversion to Hinduism.
Built many temples, took irrigational and housing projects.

Raghunatha Nayak (1600–1634) - A gifted scholar in Sanskrit, Kannada and Telugu languages, as well as a talented musician co-ruled with his father till 1614 is regarded as the greatest in the Thanjavur Nayak dynasty. Raghunatha was a gifted scholar and an expert in the art of swordplay, a fine marksman and a skilled master in horse riding. He is famous for his patronage of literature other scholarly research. One of his wives, Ramabhadramba was highly educated and a gifted poet.
During his time he granted military assistance to the Chandragiri (Vijayanagar) ruler Venkata II to recover most of his lost areas from the Golconda forces.
In 1620 Raghunatha Nayak permitted a Danish settlement at Tarangambadi. This encouraged the English to seek trade with the Thanjavur Nayaks.
The Tanjore cannon or Raghunatha cannon, supposed to be the largest cannon in the world was installed during Raghunatha Nayak, built with Danish metallurgy know how. It was during Raghunatha's reign that a palace library was established.
He successfully led his army along with the imperial Vijayanagari army in the famous battle of Toppur where Senji Nayak lost almost all his territory except the Gingee fort to Chandragiri (Vijayanagar) crushing the succession and installed the 15 year boy-king Rama Deva Raya to the throne of Chandragiri in 1617.

Vijaya Raghava Nayak (1634–1673), was the last of the Nayak Kings of Thanjavur. He was also called Mannaru Dasa. His long reign witnessed a large amount of literary output both in music and Telugu literature. Vijayaraghava’s court had a number of poets and literary scholars. Vijayaraghava Nayak wrote more than thirty books in Telugu.

The end of the Thanjavur Nayak dynasty was brought on by Chokkanatha Nayak, the Nayak of Madurai. Chokkanatha placed his younger brother Alagiri Nayak on the throne of Thanjavur, but within a year the latter threw off his allegiance, and Chokkanatha was forced to recognise the independence of Thanjavur. A son of Vijaya Raghava induced the Bijapur Sultan to help him get back the Thanjavur throne.

In 1675, the Sultan of Bijapur sent a force commanded by the Maratha general Venkaji to drive away the Madurai usurper. Venkaji defeated Alagiri with ease, and occupied Thanjavur. He did not, however, place his protege on the throne as instructed by the Bijapur Sultan, but seized the kingdom and made himself king. Thus ended the reign of Nayaks and the start of Maratha power in Thanjavur.

In EU4 terms province of Tirunelveli, Madurai, Tiruchirapalli, & Dindigul (Southern Kongu) - (During Nayak rule, 1570).

Kampana Udaiyar, a Vijayanagara prince marched into Madurai in 1372 expelled the sultan out of Madurai and started a dynasty, subordinate to the court of Vijayanagara that lasted until 1404. After ruling for sometime, Kampana Udaiyar left his son Embana Udaiyar in charge of Madurai, who was succeeded by his brother-in-law Porkasa Udeiyar. Around 1404, Porkasa Udaiyar was succeeded by a man named Lakkana Nayakkan, thus bringing the dynastic rule of Kampana Udaiyar to an end. Lekkina Nayakkan appointed Vira Parakkrama Pandyan to rule Madurai, who belong to Pandyan dynasty. But soon after Vira Parakkrama Pandyan revolted to become independent, he was dismissed and chased away to Chera country, and Lantana Nayaka jointly ruled Madurai with another Nayaka named Mathanan until 1451.

Between 1451 and 1499, the Madurai regions were ruled by four persons brought by Lakkana Nayakkan whom he declared to be of true Pandya stock. The four persons were Sundara Tol Maha Vilivanathi Rayar, Kaleiyar Somanar, Anjatha Perumal and Muttarasa Thirumalai Maha Vilivanathi Rayar - all the four persons belonged to the same family, and were illegitimate sons of a petty Pandyan chieftain. It appears that there were also some Bana chieftains ruling in Kanchipuram and some pockets in Madurai region who would take advantage of the momentary weakening position of Vijayanagari Nayaks. Subsequently the Nayaks appointed were: (1500-1530s).
• Narasa Nayak
• Tenna Nayak
• Narasa Pillai
• Kuru Kuru Timmappa Nayak
• Kattiyama Kamayya Nayak
• Chinnappa Nayakka
• Ayyakarai Veyyappa Nayak

One of these Bana chieftains (erstwhile Chola allegiance), Veerasekara Chola occupied the Pandya region. In 1538, the Vijayanagara commander Kotikam Nagama Nayaka defeated Veerasekara Chola. However, Nagama Nayaka declared independence from the Vijayanagara dynasty instead of handing back the kingdom. To check the rebellion of Nagama Nayaka, emperor Krishnadeva Raya sent a large force under Viswanatha Nayak. Vishwanatha Nayaka was the son of Nagama Nayaka. Viswanatha eventually defeated and imprisoned his father. He was rewarded by the Vijayanagara king who made him the Viceroy of the Tamil Country.

It should be noted that Nagama Nayaka was the brother of Timappa Nayak - father of Sevappa Nayak (founder of Tanjore Nayak line). Thus Vishwanath Nayak (founder of Madurai Nayak Line) & Sevappa Nayak (founder of Tanjore Nayak Line) were cousins.

Vishwanatha Nayakka ruled from 1535 to 1544, and was succeeded by Varathappa Nayakkar who ruled for a very short period of about a year. In 1545, Dumbicchi Nayakkan became the Governor, and after twenty months, he was succeeded by Vishwanatha Nayakkan again, until Vitthala Raja took over. Vitthala Raja ruled from 1546 to 1558. hereafter Vishwanatha Nayak took over again from 1559 to 1563. After Vishwanatha Nayak, his son Kumara Krishnappa Nayaka took over and from thereon, the heredity rule of Vishwanatha Nayaka continued.

Kumara Krishnappa Nayaka (1563-1573) Viswantha Nayak was succeeded by his son Krishnappa Nayak who along with his father's able minister Ariyanatha expanded the Madurai Kingdom under the Nayaks and brought most of the ancient Pandyan territory under its rule. After Talikota, he became lax in paying tribute to Vijayanagar now based at Chandragiri near Trichi.

Kumara Krishnappa Nayak was succeeded in 1573 by his two sons, who ruled jointly and uneventfully until 1595, when they in turn were succeeded by their two sons, one of whom ruled until 1602.

Muttu Krishnappa Nayaka (1602-1609) These were followed by Muttu Krishnappa Nayak. He is credited with having given the Setupatis of Ramnad a considerable slice of territory in the Maravar country, on condition that they suppress crime and protect pilgrims journeying to Rameswaram. These were the beginnings of Ramnad kingdom.

Muttu Virappa Nayaka (1609-1623) Muttu Krishnappa Nayak was succeeded by his eldest son, Muttu Virappa. He began the construction of the Dindigul at Dindigul on the Hill, along with the Temple on it, which later was completed by Tirumalai Nayak. Muttu Virappa is said to have have paid the Vijayanagara king at Chandragiri a tribute of 600,000 pagodas in 1616 post his defeat at battle of Toppur.

Tirumalai Nayaka (1623-1659) crushed the rebellion of the Setupatis of Ramnad. The Setupathi and his Maravas withdrew to the island of Pamban and procured the assistance of Europeans.

Muttu Veerappa Nayaka (1659-1662) He tried to induce the Nayak of Tanjore to join the enterprise against rising power of Sultan of Carnatic (Gingee). He tried to reconcile with the sultan but no qualms. The Sultan invaders moved against Trichinopoly and Madurai, spreading havoc, while Muttu Alakadri remained inactive behind the walls of the fort. Fortunately for him, the enemy soon had to retire, for their devastations produced a local famine and pestilence from which they themselves suffered terribly. They made a half-hearted attempt on Trichinopoly and then permitted themselves to be bought off for a very moderate sum. Muttu Alakadri did not long survive their departure, but gave himself over to debauchery with an abandon which soon brought him to a dishonoured grave.

Chokkanatha Nayaka (1662-1682) At the age of 16, this young ruler began his reign with an ill-considered attempt to drive out the Muslim troops, despatching a large army against the Gingee fortress. His general, however, sold himself to the enemy and wasted time and money in a long and unprofitable campaign which was little but pretence. He was also harassed by a domestic conspiracy, in which the same unfaithful general took a prominent part, The officers whom he entrusted with the duty of repelling the attack again were disloyal, and it was not until he himself finally took command of the army that the Muslim invaders were driven back to Tanjore and eventually to Gingee.
In the next year (1663 or 1664) Chokkanatha paid a heavy price for his temporary success. The Muslims burst into the Trichinopoly and Madura districts and devastated the country with almost incredible cruelty. They again besieged Trichinoploy, and this time he had to buy them off with a large sum. He consoled himself by punishing the Nayakkan of Tanjore and Setupati of Ramnad, who had failed to help him in repelling them. This latter enterprise was unsuccessful, for though he succeeded in taking several forts in the Marava country, he was baffled by the guerilla tactics of his adversary, and had to retire without obtaining that chief’s submission. This Campaign aspired the Setupati to form an independent kingdom.
A secret love affair with the princess of Tanjore and unfortunate turns of event where inspite of winning Tanjore he lost the Princess made him heart-broke.
Chokkantha was replaced on his tottering throne about 1678 by a Muslim adventurer who during the next two years usurped the whole of his authority, and even the ladies of his and his fallen brother’s harems, and at last was slain by Chokkanatha himself and a few of his friends.
In 1682 his capital was besieged by Mysore was shadowed by forces belonging to the Marathas, who, while pretending to be on his side, were only waiting for a chance to seize his territory for themselves; and was threatened by a body of Maravans who norminally and hurried to his assistance, but in reality had only come to share in the booty which the sack of Trichinopoly was expected to yield.
The Marathas, who were now established in Gingee as well as Tanjore, inflicted a crushing defeat on the Mysore troops and drove them out of almost every corner of the Madura and Trichinopoly districts. Madura itself they were unable to capture, for the Maravans, regarding the men of Mysore as on the whole more eligible neighbours than the Marathas, helped the former to hold that fortress. The latter had pretended to be, and laid siege to Trichinopoly itself. In despair at their treachery, Chokkantha died of a broken heart in 1682.

Rangakrishna Muthu Virappa Nayaka (1682-1689) Rangakrishna Muthu Virappa Nayak, who succeeded Chokkanatha was a spirited boy of fifteen. He tried to revive the diminished fortunes of the kingdom. He made a name for himself by ignoring Aurangazeb with courage, but little enough of his territories remained to him to rule. The greater part of them was held by Mysore, some by the Maravans, some by the Marathas of Gingee, and some by the Marathas of Tanjore. At first, the country was subject to anarchy and pillage, foreign enemies occupied all the forts, and robber chiefs were masters of the rural areas and carried on their brigandage there with impunity.
Matters slowly improved, with Mysore soon distracted by a war with the Marathas of Gingee, and both the Setupathis of Ramnad and the Marathas of Tanjore occupied by wars within their own countries. Emperor Aurangzeb in 1686–1687 conquered the kingdoms of Madura's old enemies, Golconda and Bijapur, and he was for many years engaged in an exhausting war with the Marathas.
Muthu Virappa recovered his capital in 1685, and he gradually reconquered large parts of the ancient kingdom of his forefathers and succeeded in restoring the power of the Nayaks of Madurai. Unfortunately he died of smallpox in 1689, at the early age of 22.

Rani Mangammal (1689-1704) Mangammal, the mother of the late Nayaka, acted for the next fifteen years as Queen-Regent on behalf of her grandson. In 1693, Madurai became a feudatory state to the emperor in Delhi with Nizams in Hyderabad as immediate Mughal representative and Arcot as vassal to Hyderabad as immediate mediator.

Vijaya Ranga Chokkanatha Nayaka (1704-1731) Apparently a dull reign of 26 years, paving way for the demise of the dynasty. His reign was distinguished by the ill-regulated and extraordinary munificence of his gifts to Brahmins and religious institutions. The injustice of his rule caused a serious riot in Madurai, the mutiny of his troops, and incessant disturbances. His only warfare was over the succession to the throne of Ramnad, in 1725. Of the two claimants, one was supported by Tanjore Marathas and the other by Madurai and the Tondaiman of Pudukotai. The Tanjore troops won a decisive victory and placed their protégé on the throne. A year or two later the Tanjore king deposed this very protégé, and divided Ramnad into Ramnad and Sivaganga which became independent Marava powers.

Queen Meenakshi (1731-1736) Vijaya Ranga Chokkanatha died in 1731, and was succeeded by his widow Meenakshi, who acted as Queen-Regent on behalf of a young boy she had adopted as the heir of her dead husband. She had only ruled a year or two when an insurrection was raised against her by Vangaru Tirumala, the father of her adopted son, who pretended to have claims of his own to the throne of Madurai. At this juncture representatives of the Mughals appeared on the scene and took an important part in the struggle.
A succession between Queen Meenakshi & Vangaru Tirumala was in 1734 interfered by Arkot (local Mughal representative as vassal of Nizams, immediate mughal representation in the South India). Vangaru was given Madurai & Tirunelveli after paying 3 millions while Queen Meenakshi could keep Trichinopoly after paying 10 millions.

Chanda Sahib accepted the crore of rupees and departed to Arcot. Two years later, in 1736 he returned, again was admitted into the fort, and proceeded to make himself master of the kingdom. He eventually marched against Vangaru Thirumala, who still was ruling in the south, defeated him at Ammaya Nayakkanur and Dindigul, drove him to take refuge in Sivaganga, and occupied the southern provinces of the Madurai kingdom. Between 1736-1740 Chanda Sahib along with his 2 brothers as governor at Dindigul & Madurai and himself at Tiruchirapalli ruled Mudarai region away from Nawab of Arcot. It was at this period that he subjugated the king of Tanjore, although he did not annex his territory, and he compelled them to cede Karaikal, now in Puducherry, to the French.

Vangaru Thirumala asked help of the Marathas and therefore in 1740, appeared in the south with a vast army, and defeated and killed the Nawab of Arcot, seized Trichinopoly, Dindigul and Madurai and captured Chanda Sahib but disregarding the claims of Vangaru Tirumala, appointed a Maratha, the well-known Morari Rao of Gooty, as their governor of the conquered kingdom. Morari Rao remained in power for two years and finally retired, in 1743, before the invading army of the Nizam re-established his weakened authority in the Carnatic and in 1744 appointed Anwar-uddin as Nawab of Arcot. The Nizam ordered that Vangaru Tirumala should be appointed king of Madurai, however the Arcot Nawab disregarded this order and Vangaru Tirumala disappeared from the scene, poisoned, some say, by Anwar-uddin.

Later, in the scramble for the Carnatic throne between Chanda Sahib, who was supported by French, and the Arcot Nawabs, Chanda Sahib was defeated in the Carnatic war and was killed by their allies Tanjore Marathas. In 1751 the Madurai kingdom smoothly passed into the British fold, when the Arcot Nawab ceded the former state to the later for the repayment of his huge loans from the British East India Company.

We already discussed about the Setupatis of Ramnad under Muttu Krishnappa Nayak (1602-1609) of Madurai. The chieftain of Ramnad belonged to the Maravar caste and was officially recognized as Sethupathi by the Nayak king of Madurai and in return, they recognized the sovereignty of the Madurai Nayak king over his lands. When the power of the Nayak kings of Madurai began to decline in the late 17th century, the chieftains of Ramnad asserted their independence. In the late 17th century, Raghunatha Kilavan crowned himself king of Ramnad and changed his seat from Pogalur to Ramnad close to the east coast. He erected massive fortifications to protect his capital. In 1725, the king of Tanjore claimed the northern part of the Ramnad kingdom (the Aranthangi region) up to the river Pambar in return for his services during the civil war in Ramnad. A vassal of Ramnad who was amongst the victors in the civil war took over the westerly located Sivaganga region, thereby leaving only three-fifths of the kingdom actually in the hands of the king of Ramnad.

Ramnad participated in the Carnatic Wars between the British and the French East India Company. The state came under British influence in the 1790s and the king of Ramnad was deposed in 1795 for misrule. The British, then, made the king's sister the ruler of Ramnad and deprecated the kingdom to a zamindari by a permanent sanad (grant) in 1803. Since then, until the India's independence in 1947, Ramnad was ruled by the queen and her descendants.

Chieftains under the Madurai Nayaks
Sadaikka Thevar Sethupathi (1590-1621)
Kootan Sethupathi (1621-1637)
Dalavai Sethupathi (1637-1659)
Raghunatha Sethupathi (1659-1670)

Independent kings
Raghunatha Kilavan (1670–1708)
Vijaya Raghunatha Sethupathi I (1708–1723)
Sundaresvara Raghunatha Sethupathi (1723 -1728)
Kumara Muthu Vijaya Raghunatha Sethupathi (1728-1734)
Muthukumara Raghunatha Sethupathi (1734-1747)
Rakka Thevar (1747-1748)
Vijaya Raghunatha Sethupathi II (1748-1760)
Muthuramalinga Sethupathi I (1760-1794)

Ruler of princely state under the paramountcy of the British Raj
Mangaleswari Nachiyar (1795-1803)

Srikalahasti is a holy town in the modern Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh on the banks of the River Swarnamukhi. A further south is Vandavashi or Wandiwash in the current Tiruvannamalai district of Tamil Nadu. The coastal tract between these two modern cities were taken care by the Kalahasti Nayaks under Aravidu Dynasty of the Vijayanagar Empire.

Damarla Chennapa Nayakadu was the Nayak ruler of Kalahasti and Vandavasi under the suzerainty of Vijayanagar emperor Sriranga Deva Raya (1572-86). Chennai (British Madras), the capital of Tamil Nadu is named in his honour. His actual reign period is not known but he was active from 1580s to 1620s.

His son Damarla Vekatappa Nayak has reference in Dutch records and during the reign of Pada Venkat Raya of Chandragiri (Vijayanagar) 1632-42, he was the one who had negotiated the British on behalf of the Vijayanagar emperor for the grant of Chennai to them.

Another name in the line we see is Damarla Ayappa Nayak from the Kalahasti Nayak line, however information are very inadequate. But the line of the Kalahasti Nayaks survived another century as well for there there is a reference of the Kalahasti Nayaks taking side of Hyder Ali during Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-1784). I need to do some more research on this.

Details about Nayak of Vellore are still shrouded in inaccuracies but it is clear that it was a subject under Nayaks of Senji and Chinna Bomma Nayak was the famous Nayak who rebuilt the famous vellore fort in 1570s. He was succeeded by his son Langam Nayak who rebelled against Nayaks of Senji in 1601 on instigated by the overlord Venkat I of Vijayanagar himself and further tried to ally with Madurai and declared independent of Vijayanagar too. Venkat I crushed Vellore Nayaks in 1604 and occupied the Vellore fort himself. Later Vellore became the fourth capital of the Vijayanagar empire.

Nayakas of Chitradurga (1588–1779 CE) ruled parts of eastern Karnatka during the post-Vijayanagara period.

Timmanna Nayaka (?–1588) of Matti: A chieftain from Matti in Davabgere taluk during the rule of Saluva Narasimha. He ruled areas covering Davangere district and Chitradurga district.

Obanna Nayaka I (1588–1602) is also known as Madakari Nayaka I.

Kasturi Rangappa Nayaka I (1602–1652) Added territories such as Mayakonda, Santebennur, Holalkere, Anaji, and Jagalur.

Madakari Nayaka II (1652–1674) He is credited with a number of military successes, particularly in the regions east of Chitradurga. He killed Shah Adib Allah in 1671 in a battle at Chitradurga.

Obanna Nayaka II (1674–1675) His rule saw civil unrest. He was killed by his own men.

Shoora Kantha Nayaka (1675–1676) His rule saw civil unrest. He was killed by his own men.

Chikkanna Nayaka (1676–1686)

Madakari Nayaka III (1686–1688)

Donne Rangappa Nayaka (1688–1689)

Bharamappa Nayaka of Bilichodu (1689–1721) known as the last of the great Nayakas of Chitradurga, he became a Maratha ally and fought in the battle of Dodderi in 1695 but had to pay tribute later to the Mughals for supporting the Marathas. He fought many pitched battles against the Mughals, and is credited for building many temples including the Ranganatha Swamy at Niratadi, and irrigation tanks.

Madakari Nayaka IV (1721–1748) was a Maratha feudatory. He was killed during continued hostilities against the Nayakas of Davangere.

Kasturi Rangappa Nayaka II (1748–1758), son of Kasturi Rangappa Nayaka II, retook Mayakonda territory and Buddha region. He achieved this with the help of the Maratha Sardar Murari Rao and the Subedar of Advani. He died in 1754 without an heir.

Madakeri Nayaka (1758–1779) the last, son of one Bharamappa Nayaka of Janakal-Durga. He was a brave soldier and a shrewd administrator. (also called as Madakari Nayaka V). He allied himself with Haider Ali of the Mysore Kingdom at times and at other times with the Marathas. It was during his time that Haider Ali attacked the Chitradurga Fort leading to the heroics of "Onake Obavva". Later having been betrayed by the Marathas and some local officers, Madakari Nayaka was defeated by Hyder Ali, taken prisoner and killed.

The Chitradurga Nayakas form an integral part of Kannada folklore.

The nayaks of Ikkeri or Kheladi (north Karnataka) also arose during Krishnadevaraya's reign. The first nayak was Keladi Nayaka Chaudappa who served Achyutaraya and Ramaraja. Sadasiva Nayak (1540-65), the successor and son of Chaudappa, was behind Bijapur's defeat at the hands of Ramaraya and, as a reward received the title of 'Raya'; later, his military exploits won him the title of 'Raja' from Ramaraya. Tulu nayaks of Ikkeri remained loyal to Vijaynagar throughout the 16th century, but in the early years of the 17th century they became practically independent under Venkatappa Nayaka I (1586-1629). The nayaks of Ikkeri always remained under heavy pressure from Bijapur, but they were able to repel the latter's attacks. Besides, they also met hostility from the Odeyar nayaks of Mysore. The Ikkeri nayaks also cast greedy eyes over Gersoppa, the richest tract for pepper in north Canara. This led to regular campaigns to subdue the queen Bhairavadevi of Gersoppa.

Chaudappa Nayaka (1499-1530)

Sadashiva Nayaka (1530–1566) The coastal provinces of Karnataka came under his direct rule. He moved the capital to Ikkeri some 20 km. from Kheladi.

Sankanna Nayaka (1566–1570)

Chikka Sankanna Nayaka (1570–1580) was an opportunistic ruler who took advantage of the confusion in the Vijayanagar Empire following its defeat at Tallikota and grabbed a few provinces in Uttara Kannada district.

Rama Raja Nayaka (1580–1586)

Hiriya Venkatappa Nayaka (1586–1629) In his reign the kingdom expanded so that it covered coastal regions, Malnad regions, and some regions to the east of the western ghats of present-day Karnataka. He is also known to have defeated the Adilshahis of Bijapur in Hanagal.

Virabhadra Nayaka (1629–1645) faced many troubles from the start, including competition from rival Jain chieftains of Malenad for the throne of Ikkeri and invasion by the Sultanate armies of Bijapur. Ikkeri was plundered by the Bijapur army during his time.

Shivappa Nayaka (1645–1660) is widely considered as the ablest and greatest of the Keladi rulers. He was not only an able administrator; he also patronised literature and fine arts. His successful campaigns against the Bijapur sultans, the Mysore kings, the Portuguese, and other Nayakas of the neighbouring territories east of the western ghats helped expand the kingdom to its greatest extent, covering large areas of present-day Karnataka. He gave importance to agriculture and developed new schemes for collection of taxes and revenues which earned him much praise from later British officials. He destroyed the Portuguese political power in the Kanara region by capturing all the Portuguese forts of the coastal region.

Chikka Venkatappa Nayaka (1660–1662)
Bhadrappa Nayaka (1662–1664)


Somashekara Nayaka I (1664–1672) The King who was once a good administrator, gave up his interest in administration after his associastion with a dancer named Kalavati. Bharame Mavuta, a relative of Kalavati slow poisoned the king which eventually led to his death.

Keladi Chennamma (1672–1697) She was an able ruler who some scholars claim was allied with the Maratha Shivaji and later his son Sambhaji to defeat all rival claimants to the throne. She gave shelter to Chhatrapathi Rajaram when he fled from the Mughal army. Chennamma of Keladi is well remembered by local people through tales of her bravery.

Basavappa Nayaka (1697–1714) He was a brave ruler and was adopted by Rani Chennammaji from their relative Markappa Shetty of Bedanur.
Somashekara Nayaka II (1714–1739)
Kiriya Basavappa Nayaka (1739–1754)
Chenna Basappa Nayaka (1754–1757)
Queen Virammaji (1757–1763)
was defeated by Hyder Ali who merged the Keladi kingdom with the Kingdom of Mysore. The queen was captured by Hyder Ali and was kept in confinement along with her son in the fort of Madugiri. They were however rescued in 1767 when Madhavrao I of the Maratha Empire defeated Hyder Ali in the battle of Madugiri. Later, they were sent to Pune the capital of the Maratha Empire for protection.

Kodagu Kingdom or Haleri Kingdom refers to the monarchistic dynasty that ruled the Kodagu region of Karnatka for over 200 years between 1600–1834 CE. The kingdom was named after a place called Haleri near Madikeri which they made as their capital. The Haleri kings were devout Lingyats and were an offshoot of the Kheladi Nayaks. The kingdom's origin is traced to Veeraraja, a nephew of Sadashiva Nayaka of the Keladi dynasty.

Muddu Raja I (1633 - 1687)
Dodda Veerapa (1687 - 1736)
Chikka Veerappa (1736 - 1766)
Devappa Raja (1766 - 1770)
Muddu Raja II, Muddaya (1770 - 1774)
Appaji Raja II (1774 - 1775)
Linga Rajendra I (Linga Raja I, 1775- 1780)
Dodda Vira Rajendra (Dodda Vira Raja, 1780 - 1809)
Devammaji (1809 - 1811)
Linga Rajendra II (Linga Raja II, 1811 - 1820)

The history of the Odeyar chiefs goes back to 1399 when they settled in this region. But it was under Chamaraja 111(1513-53) and his son Timrnaraja (1533-72) that the Odeyars came into prominence. Vijaynagar's hold over this territory & specially Ummanttur) was never complete. We find that the most powerful of the Vijaynagar ruler Krishnadevaraya found it difficult to curb these Umrnattur chiefs. Odeyar nayaks continued to defy the Vijaynagar might till the Raja finally succeeded in 1610 in ousting the Vijaynagar viceroy of Seringapatanam made it his capital. Information on Mysore are easily available so I am not going in details. Odeyar dynasty along with one in Tirhut are one of the oldest living dynasties in India.

Sinhaladvipa Katha, the Nayak king Kumara Krishnappa, who reigned at Madurai (1562–1572), is said to have conquered Kandy. Kumara Krishnappa killed the then reigning Kandy king, sent the late king's wife and children to Anuradhapura and placed his own brother-in-law Vijaya Gopala Naidu as his viceroy in Kandy.

A cadet branch of the Madurai Nayak dynasty, the Kandyan Nayaks were related to the Tanjore Nayaks as well. In total, four Nayakkar monarchs ruled in Kandy, the last of whom, Sri Vikrama Rajasinha, was deposed as a result of the Kandyan nobility's collusion with the British and exiled to Vellore Fort in India.

The Nayaks of Kandy were notable for re-establishing the long-dormant tradition among the Sinhalese monarchs of marrying from South Indian nobility, and for their childless marriages resulting in non-linear succession.The Nayaks were originally Hindus, but later converted to Buddhism and were responsible for a renaissance of Buddhist culture on the Island.

The stability and power of the Kandyan Nayaks were heavily reliant on the support from the Madurai and Tanjore branches of the House, particularly in the form of military assistance against the Portuguese and Dutch- alliances cemented by intermarriage between Kandy and South India. Thus, intermarriage across the Palk Strait became a matter of policy for Kandy in 17th and 18th centuries.

The last king of the Kandy Mahanuwara dynasty was Vira Narendra Sinha who ruled from 1707 to 1739 and had married relation with brides from Madurai Royal family, had no children by either of the queens. Thus, the king nominated, as his successor, the brother of his first queen who had remained at the court ever since his sister married him. When Narendra Sinha's brother-in-law succeeded the throne, the Sinhalese Kandyan aristocracy had no problem with this new form of succession.The practice of marrying princesses from Madurai is said to have come into occurrence as the Kandy kings insisted on consorts from the Suryavamsa lineage to grace their coronation and to produce heirs acceptable to the people.

Sri Vijaya Rajasinha 1739–1747
Kirti Sri Rajasinha 1747–1782
Sri Rajadhi Raja Singha 1782–1798
Sri Vikrama Rajasinha 1798–1815

In Eu4 terms, South Kanara (present Udupi, Dakhshin Kannad district of Karnataka & Kasaragod district of Kerala).

The earliest inscription of the Vijayanagara period seen at Attavara in Mangalore Taluk in AD 1345, reveals that South Canara itself came to form a part of the empire with a decade of its birth. In fact, the founders of the Vijayanagar Empire were this very region. This marked the establishment of an efficient and centralised form of government in South Canara for about three centuries. For administrative convenience the Vijayanagara rulers divided South Canara into Mangalore (roughly Dakshin Kannada & Kasaragod district) and Barkur (Udupi district) and two governors were appointed to look after each from Mangalore and Barkur as head quarters. But many times only one governor ruled over both Mangalore and Barkur. The authority who made these appointments was either the emperor or an imperial officer or both. The governors were changed at the will of their superiors with out any regard of their duration.

We do not have a very concrete list of all those Vijayanagari Nayaks for Tulunadu, but multiple inscription sites can help us guess them as:

Veerapanna Odeya (1422-1446)
Mangasara Odeya (1446-1470)
Pandaraideva Odeya (1470-1492)
Deevaraya Odeya (1492-1518)
Vijaya Odeya (1518-1526)
Timmanna Odeya (1526-1543)
Achappa Odeya (1543-1554)

Sadasiva Raya (1544-1565), the Vijayanagara Emperor, handed over the Tulunadu to Sadashiv Nayak of Kheladi in 1554 and then Tulunadu became a part of the Nayaks of Ikkeri.

The Tulunadu witnessed the emergence of a number of feudatory states enjoying Semi independent powers from the beginning of the Vijayanagara overlordship until the establishment of the British power. These small principalities were subordinated to the Nayaks of Vijayanagar.

Notable among them were the Chowta Jain rulers of Ullal and Moodabidri (c. 1160-1801 C.E), Ajila Jain rulers of Venur (c. 1418-1800 C.E), the Savanta or Samantha Rajas of Mulki (c. 1411- 1700), the Bhairarasa Jain Odeyas of Karkala (c. 1240-1650 C.E), the Tolaharas of Suralu (c.1139-1800 C.E), the Bangas of Bangadi (c. 1410-1800 C.E.), the Rajas of Kumbla (c. 12th century - 1800 C.E) and the Rajas of Vitla (c. 1436-1800 C.E).

By 1613 the Kheladi Nayaks were no longer loyal to Vijayanagar and Tulunadu was almost independent.

Rani Abbakka Devi of Chouta Ullal became a legend when she managed to defeat the Portuguese with the help of Kheladi Nayaks in a series of war (1555-60) before being captured in 1570.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbakka_Chowta

In EU4 terms North Kannara.

The first ruler of Gerasoppe family was Saluva Narana and he was followed by Saluva Nagana. Then followed many rulers in that line; afterwards came Honna, Kama Mangarasa (Mavarasa) and Haivarasa. We do not very concrete data for the earlier kings but after Haivarasa we have many helps from inscriptions. All these kings were Jains rulers and subordinated to Vijayanagar empire. We do not have the exact date for the reign of Haivarasa but we now are certain that his wife was Bhairadevi Saluva. He had two sons Sangiraya (Sangamabhupa) and son-in -law Malliraja. Haivarasa Odeya ruled over most of North Kanara area: Haduvalli (Bhatkal), Gerasoppe (Honavar) Nagire & Gokarna (with a little of northern Tulunadu).

The Odeya dynasty like many of those in Tulunadu were matrilineal in which the sister’s son would be the next heir in line. In 1408, Sangiraya Odeya son of Haivarasa Odeya revolted against the succession in female line and founded a separate independent principality with its capital in Haduvalli (Near Bhatkal) and thus the family of Odeya Jain Kings of Gerasoppa spitted into two Branches, Gerasoppa or Nagire and Sangitapura (Haduvalli.)

The Vijayanagara rulers do not seem to have viewed this development favourably and there followed a series of rivalry and warfare between the two branches of the same family for a century and half when in 1550s both the branches of the family again got merged under Queen Chennabhairadevi.

It is suggested that the strained relation between the Nagire and Haduvalli Chiefs was basically due to the difference in the rule of succession i.e., while the Nagire Chiefs followed Aliya Aantana (succession through son-in-law) rule, the Haduvalli family pursued Makkaia Aantana (succession through sons). However, this may not be the only reason. The fact that the Nagire Chiefs were almost always on the offensive indicates that they did not like a collateral family ruling independently in the precincts of their own kingdom. The low lines of the family can be drawn as:

Gerasoppe Branch
Sangama Malliraja (Manga III) (?-?)
Keshavdeva Odeyar (1401-1420)
Sangiraya Odeyar (1420-1428)
Bhairavdeva Odeyar I (1428-1462)
Immadi Bhairava (1462-1462)
Malliraja II (1462-1471) Ruling from Hanovar. Then 1471-1480 ruling from Gersoppe.
Devarasa Odeyar (1481-1502)
Saluva Bhairavraya Odeyar (1502-1508)
Mallrao Odeyar (1508-1512)
Saluva Immadi Devarasa Odeyar (1514-1523)
Padumala Devi (1523-1529)
Saluva Krishnadevasara Odeyar (1529-1559)

Sangitapura Branch (Haduvalli)
Sangiraya Odeyar (1408-1448)
Indagarasa Odeyar (1449-1460)
Sangiraya Odeyar II (1460-1476)
Indradevarasa (Saluvendra II) (1476-1508)
Devarasa Odeyar I (1508-1523)
Gururaja Odeyar (1527-1533)
Devarasa Odeyar II (1533-1541)
Chennadeviamma (1541-1551)

Chennabhairadevi (1551-1560) from Sangitapura and from 1560-1607 United Gerasoppa).

In 1551 A.D. The ruler at Sangitapura was Chennadevi Amma. At the same time the ruler of Gerasoppe was Saluva Krishnadevarasa. The latter died without any issue while in Sangitapura Chennadeviamma was succeeded by her sister Chennabhairadevi. She was Sose (niece) of Saluva Krishnadivarasa. Since he had no issue, Chennabhairadevi took up the reign of the government of Gerasoppe like also and thus by about 1560 A.D. both branches came to be united and both Gerasoppe and Bhatkal (Haduvalli) enjoyed the position of headquarters of the principality.

Pepper Queen Channabhairadevi of Gersoppa (1551-1607).

“We must deal with her, most carefully and diplomatically. We must be courteous, polite and diplomatic to win her to our side” reads a Portuguese record of 1591 C.E. this was the realisation of the Portuguese after a very bad defeat they suffered at the hands of Chennabhairadevi, the Queen of Gerasoppa.

Inscriptions call Chennabhairadevi, as ruler of Haiva, Tuluva and Konkan areas. These roughly comprised of North and South Kanaras, southern region of Goa and northern Malabar. Since important harbors of Mirjan, Ankola and Baindur came under this territory, there used to be skirmishes with adjoining rulers throughout, which wanted to grab them. Besides, this entire belt was known as pepper country, where the spices grew abundantly in the virgin forests, which were in great demand in Europe. Actually Chennabhairadevi was known as Raina- Da-Pimenta or "Pepper Queen".

Though the Vijayanagara empire was on the decline, the queen called herself a subordinate (mahamandaleshwara) of Vijayanagar rulers. She was always busy checking the advances of Portuguese who were notorious for their unfair practices and treachery in Indian context. At the same time she had to be ever alert with the rulers of the adjoining Keladi kingdom and Bilgi chiefs, the latter being another principality near by. They always tried to grab the harbours and trade. She had sought help of Adilshah of Bijapur while crushing the Portuguese. The help did not reach on time, but she was successful. The Portuguese were humbled.

Herself a Jain, she gave grants to all Shaiva, Vaishnava and Shakti temples in Gokarna, Uppunda, Baindur and Khetappa Narayana temple of Bhatkal. Saraswat Brahmin businessmen and other skilled Konkani craftsmen from Goa came, settled and availed her benevolent rule, to escape Portuguese persecution. Most prominent among these were Lakkarasa Kamti and Kheta Pai who built beautiful temples. Akalanka, the Jain scholar and Bhattakalaka, the renowned grammarian were protégés of Gerasoppa queen.

But the efforts of Keladi Nayaka and Bilgi chiefs continued to pull her down. Finally a marital tie brought the two rulers together, literally joining hands! They jointly attacked Gerasoppa, completely defeating the brave queen. Gerasoppa thus became part of Keladi kingdom. The ageing queen was taken a prisoner and died in a prison in Keladi.

Thus ended the rule of a brave, kind, tolerant and benevolent queen who perhaps had the longest reign as a woman ruler in Indian history.


On a completely different note, I think development in Vijayanagar should be 25+. I would like to advocate for an event exactly opposite to like that of Constantinople event. If Vijayanagar loses its capital reduce its development to minus 4 in each category. Currently with 16 development it neither does justice to pre 1565 era nor post Talikota. Also it was more like an important centre for thriving cutting stone and gems industry, this need be reflected. It could start with Gems or clothes and an event could change production to grain incase Vijay loses it. Further its placement under Rayalseema is misleading. Tungabhadra can be another territory including Vijayanagar, Raichur Doab.

Edited: Province correction under Madurai Nayak (first line).
Added: Tulunadu & Gersoppa.
 
Last edited:
The Nawabate of the Carnatic should probably get the Muslim coup event that ai Muslim-ruled indian states get, it often splits off from Vijayanagar and stays Hindu while any other state will get the coup event
 
I would say, it happens so 50% of the time more or less. But these events appear as laden one without mechanism, like Goa event. Carnatic doesn't even make sense without Mughals, same as one can see Punjab right from the game start if forced to release them in war. (it is difficult to even imagine them without Sikh).

EU4 now has different ages, they can activate and deactivate dormant tags with the reign of different age if they want for better.
 
Last edited:
Rayalaseema area should correctly be referred from the below map.

Proposed_states_and_territories_of_India.png