-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Here is another maybe important LINK for this but the documents are in french and I don't know french.
Select historical events -> the pioneering phase -> the beginning of the cold war -> central and easter europe
Select historical events -> the pioneering phase -> the beginning of the cold war -> central and easter europe
No, there's nothing dealing with that in DD. Nor is there likely to be. Your best bet to see this in game is through one of the mods out there...
So a nuclear bomb on Moscow at the start of DD scenario is a historical thing?
Well I didn't mean it should happen always, just that there has to be chance for it to happen.
Well I didn't mean it should happen always, just that there has to be chance for it to happen.
I'm not acting as paradox advocate here, but there are certain scenarios in game that are basen on an ahistoric idea, but they don't usually have any events.
In fact, Hoi2 (and DD Hoi2) doesn't even have the historic Tito-Stalin schism, and you should ask paradox as to why it is this way.
In fact, Hoi2 (and DD Hoi2) doesn't even have the historic Tito-Stalin schism, and you should ask paradox as to why it is this way.
kami888 said:
Well, that what we are here for ... nothing like a little kick here and a poke in the ribs there to get a world war going.
Myros
So the allies are actually quite aggressive? I'm suprised, I doubt they would fight another war after WWII had just finished. Hell, Britain is still paying back their lend-lease!
Allies are aggressive? No you got all wrong mate, in DD it's evil Stalin who decided to take over the world so the allies needed to rally for the defence of freedom and democracy.
Neither, they are just at war with each other.
It happens, it was their wifes that met on a bridge and disgussed china (get the douple meaning?), then they got into a heated argument over which dress was the most outdated and then they went to war (yes, the wife of the allies and the wife of the comintern, what's so difficult about that?).
Does it show that I should be in bed right now?
It happens, it was their wifes that met on a bridge and disgussed china (get the douple meaning?), then they got into a heated argument over which dress was the most outdated and then they went to war (yes, the wife of the allies and the wife of the comintern, what's so difficult about that?).
Does it show that I should be in bed right now?
You're wrong. Read the country descriptions. It clearly says who started it and who's the evil guy.
Helme Haffax said:Sovjets are the evil guys since Command&Conquer Red Alert.
Soviet is evil since December 30, 1922
Your comment would've been funny if it wasn't so sad.
The problem is that evil guy thing seems to be the central idea of the scenario. That's why USSR starts with 30 belligerence and 30 dissent, while USA starts with 0 of both. There are also other indications of this phenomenon.
Or maybe since November 1917?
