• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I got a new proposition for airbase rule , i think it should improve flexibility ingame

1-4 airbases = You can base 4 planes of anykind (STR can only be based in a 4 level airbases minimum)

5-8 airbases = 8 (only 4 can be FTR/INT)

9-10 airbases = 12 (only 8 can be FTR/INT)


Any observation?
 
Last edited:
jackda said:
I got a new proposition for airbase rule , i think it should improve flexibility ingame

1-4 airbases = You can base 4 planes of anykind (STR can only be based in a 4 level airbases minimum)

5-8 airbases = 8 (only 4 can be FTR/INT)

9-10 airbases = 12 (only 8 can be FTR/INT)


Any observation?
Hmm why the type restriction?
 
dermeister said:
Hmm why the type restriction?


just an idea, Anders made the same remark than yours
My first though was to make CAS to have a better efficiency despite the airbase rule.
Foremore Dexter think that NAV should have the same restrictions than STR (be stuck in a level 4 base mini), i think he's right, if we keep the "type restriction".....
 
That rule change a lot strategy of fights in pacific. To use naval bombers (often large 2 or 4 engine aircrafts) will need 4 lvl (large) airfield. No longer lvl 1 airfield in middle of nowhere with 50 air units.... that was sad and unhistorical.