@jak7139 it's always a nail biter when you lose the heir. What happens in EU IV if someone else inherits you? Did the player keep going with the new fellow? Or is that not allowed to happen?
If your ruler dies without an heir, one of three things can happen:
- If you have no marriages, a random noble from your country will found a new dynasty
- If you have a marriage with another nation, you will get a ruler of their dynasty or
- You will fall under a union with that nation
EU4 is a game about countries, not rulers. So, really, your ruler doesn't matter except for getting unions and for their stats.
Otherwise, a nice stable period of growth, rest and recovery.
And that will continue for a while yet.
Briefly mentioned about this issue recently, but would like to reiterate that here again.
It is advantageous to save some of the available targets for such situations, for the reason is:
Going to war helps the process of waiting for the heir when playing with monarchy tags, no matter the tag-religion, but especially useful for tags with pu-mechanics.
When pu-alert drops-down, meaning no heir and the player will fall under a pu (and a possible succession war between two rivals else interested tags), going to war eradicates that chance (as the alert is turned off), apparently lowers the chance of the ruler death, and increases the potential heir events. Not an official info, no definition is available, pure player experience (so, heavy confirmation bias), but the game runs as such. Had averted countless pu-madness back in the day by going to war while the ruler is over seventy with no heir.
I know about being at war preventing unions. In this case, we don't have any easy targets to do this with, but I felt we needed the land more than possibly preventing a union or dynasty change.
Could you fall into a PU under Burgundy? Then the Burgundian inheritance fires and chaos emerges. Thank you for the update.
We could. One of my hopes for this early stage was that we would get the inheritance. We'll see how that plays out.
Hopefully that formal alliance between France and Scotland ends up fighting many wars with England... and not with you.
Hopefully! Although, due to England's naval dominance, they usually rush down Scotland, separate peace them, and take land from them in such cases.
Are the Italian Wars currently limited to Venice and Hungary, or have any other Italian states joined (on either side)? What territory is officially in dispute?
It's just Venice vs. Hungary. No other Italians are involved. A screenshot I left out of the last chapter:
I’ve probably asked this question (or something similar) before here or elsewhere that’s been answered before, but: as a rule, do you think it’s usually worth stating provinces as soon as it’s an option even if only say 1 out of 4 in the state held, low income province? What broad rule of thumb do you use?
It's worth stating everything if you either don't have problems with Governing Capacity or don't plan on turning any of those provinces into a Trade Company. The extra income, lowered autonomy, and increased Reform Progress growth is all worth it.
Even if you're low on admin points, you can just leave the provinces half-stated and core them later whenever you have time.
Moments like this make having a republic seem a bit simpler!
Republics are definitely simpler! Funnily enough, before Absolutism was introduced as a mechanic, I think most players would've considered republics to be the best/strongest government type in the game.
You don't have to deal with the Stability loss on monarch death, you have no RNG with your ruler stats (allowing you to focus your point generation every election-cycle as needed), and you don't have the potential risk of falling under a union.
Uh oh, danger Will Robinson, danger! How likely is it Otto will become the monster that devours the world, because there may be little modest Brittany can do to avert that for the foreseeable future?
We can't do anything directly no. But Russia is doing really well this game, more well than I've seen in a long time. Even though the Ottomans are big, they are still an AI. So they won't devour the world, especially once they run out of Mission Tree claims.
There's also Persia and the other Middle East powers as well.
Haha, I guess this is the opposite of cheesed off - cheesed on?

Good to see the latest installment of this guide/AAR.
And I'm glad to have your and everyone's readership!
I always perk up when I see the Danes getting involved, even if it is many years after the time period I usually write about. I see your Danes have a nice slice of Russia to rule too!
They do have a good piece of Russia. But the Polish war is not going well for them. They really shouldn't have gotten involved in it.