• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
whatever, if pred. wants Italy again he can have it. I'll take any major except USA <yawn>.

(though I am not keen on this little twist of a rule where people who played one country have first rights to the exact same county game after game, I have never been allies in any k2 game yet, and im a founding member :eek: )
 
Nicophorus said:
whatever, if pred. wants Italy again he can have it. I'll take any major except USA <yawn>.

(though I am not keen on this little twist of a rule where people who played one country have first rights to the exact same county game after game, I have never been allies in any k2 game yet, and im a founding member :eek: )

There is no twist to the rule, really the only reason that I think KT2 should get to take his pick is because he spent four sessions and got no fight. That is about it. And then also, Predator, may not have the time we have to post in advance all the time on the forum, so we should respect his standing with the game, I think.

Why not take Canada, and negotiate for control of all the Commonwealth armies activities in Asia.
 
Last edited:
Cueball said:
There is no twist to the rule, really the only reason that I think KT2 should get to take his pick is because he spent four sessions and got no fight. That is about it. And then also, Predator, may not have the time we have to post in advance all the time on the forum, so we should respect his standing with the game, I think.


ok, so under these guidelines I can be Japan again? Just wondering.
 
Well my personal view is that players who have played all the way through the last game get priority. Then there are mitigating factors. MG wants to avenge himself with UK, and KT2 got screwed out of playing anything but tiddlywinks for four five sessions, so I think those are good reasons to allow them picks. The rest is pretty open.

Adam called Japan right away and he has as much standing as anyone else, so, other than that I don't think anything is hard and fast. Other than that I don't really care.

You said you dont want Fra/USA, or Axis, so that really leaves Canada from among the Allies. Why not take Canada, and negotiate for control of all the Commonwealth armies activities in Asia? Canada is a riot in my view, but I am a minority view on that it seems.
 
What an interesting hirearchy! So let me see if I understand, people who played the most sessions get to pick first, and if there is a conflict/tie the person who had the country before gets it again.

I guess I have to wait to see if predator picks italy or germany, and take the one left over.
 
If you want UK ill take Germany (If Hiensen or whoever doesnt want it)...

But id prefer to make up for my botched UK. Your Call if you really want to be Allies Nico.
 
Hmmm, I can be flexible!! Nico if u want SU that's fine with me, perhaps I will try Italy again.
Beware, I've only played Italy once in MP....but....... it was as usual............ an Axis win. Or, I would be willing to try the USA, never played them!! :) sure they would be fun.
 
I really think people underestimate Canada's importance to a good Allied defence in the early years of the war. It can even be critical, I think, to good command and control of the Allied forces.
 
Mighty G said:
If you want UK ill take Germany (If Hiensen or whoever doesnt want it)...

But id prefer to make up for my botched UK. Your Call if you really want to be Allies Nico.

In anycase MG, I have am putting a bunch of Islolationist/Interventionist slider shifts for USA dependent on which countries the Axis ally and DOW. I don't know if it will work, but the idea is to get USA closer to war along the lines of the Aussie system. It should be interesting to see how it works.
 
does anyone know why 25 base IC in national provinces is only 8 base IC?? :confused:
 
Cueball said:
I really think people underestimate Canada's importance to a good Allied defence in the early years of the war. It can even be critical, I think, to good command and control of the Allied forces.

I understand Canada's importance. I played UK once in MEM, and I relinquished all mil. control of the empire forces to Canada's player while I concentrated on teh english navy/army/airforce. It worked very well and it was an allied win.

Its just that too (toooo) many UK players squabble with canada over who gets to control africa/butan/australia, whatever. Just dont want to deal with it.
 
a.d.a.m said:
does anyone know why 25 base IC in national provinces is only 8 base IC?? :confused:

Is it building up after annex? You mean if it is a core or not?
 
Nicophorus said:
I understand Canada's importance. I played UK once in MEM, and I relinquished all mil. control of the empire forces to Canada's player while I concentrated on teh english navy/army/airforce. It worked very well and it was an allied win.

Its just that too (toooo) many UK players squabble with canada over who gets to control africa/butan/australia, whatever. Just dont want to deal with it.

Well all the pepes around here are reasonable people, I think.
 
Nico could have a point there i can be pretty demanding on my Minors.

And i can see right off the bat that we both share a different idealistic outlook on the war. (He wants to war as quick as possible where i do not).

Having said that we have never worked together, so its all just hear say isnt it.

I just dont like witnessing mass loss of shipping and unneccsary deaths.... hahah but then after my last performance, sheeet, i can hardly say beep can i!!!! :)
 
a.d.a.m said:
does anyone know why 25 base IC in national provinces is only 8 base IC?? :confused:

Ok I fixed that up. Send you the complete files soon for you to check out.
 
I give up,predator can take germany and nicophorus italy.Now it's solved for the countries. :)
I'm not interested in playing with a minor.
 
Well, that's too bad. I'll PM you when things are settled, and if there is a change.

Cheers.