Let's Kill Someone - Yet Another MP Game

[Rythin]

Or when the 3 humans in alliance rule was broken as well.

I wasn't a GM then. And I was complaining rather loudly to Byakhiam about this problem.

And what about my proposal (no human alliances and no NAP's)? Noone ever considered it?

No. If we ban NAPs, they will still exist but just become unofficial ones. And banning human alliances? It is good in warmongerish Empires of Steel but not here, because in spite of the name LKS is not really lets-kill-everyone game. However, I think that reducing a number of people in one alliance to two with an exception of countries smaller than thirty provinces is a good idea. On the other hand, as Zeit says, the number of provinces is not really good indicator as Portugal with it's fleet becomes an uber ally in later game.

 

[Moredhel]

I wasn't a GM then. And I was complaining rather loudly to Byakhiam about this problem.

Glad that we agree on this one

No. If we ban NAPs, they will still exist but just become unofficial ones. And banning human alliances? It is good in warmongerish Empires of Steel but not here, because in spite of the name LKS is not really lets-kill-everyone game. However, I think that reducing a number of people in one alliance to two with an exception of countries smaller than thirty provinces is a good idea. On the other hand, as Zeit says, the number of provinces is not really good indicator as Portugal with it's fleet becomes an uber ally in later game.

Yep, It's "Let's kill someone" and we already did it! Banning alliances wont destroy them. They still will be existing, just not using the game mechanics. I suppose this way everyone will use warnings and guarantees to get cb's and to maintain an alliance.

 

[Rythin]

They still will be existing, just not using the game mechanics.

Two countries fighting Austria separately. Each of them has +40 warscore. One of them gets one province and the second 200d. Right No, banning alliances is undiscussable. Could anyone write one single word opinioning my idea about reducing the number of people per alliance? Oh, and I exploited the fact I am the writer of the first post and changed the third rule a bit. Three province rule will last till Napoleonic Era as it encourages wars (not much to lose).

 

[Moredhel]

Ok. Oookeey. You conviced me Lets make the 2 people in alliance rule (with no exceptions to Portugal and Brandenburg ). Quick, change the rule before anyone noticed

 

[Rythin]

As Zeitgeist pointed out, the problem with small Portugal and Brandenburg is that they are minor powers and no one would like to ally them. So that's why the province restriction seems to be a good idea.

 

[unmerged(28729)]

i quit too, tomorrow i'll post some explanation

 

[Rythin]

The game is tommorow and we still lack one player.

 

[unmerged(7276)]

Im having to work late today i think. Might miss session..

 

[Citizen_X]

I'm up this evening if u need a sub. I need test my conexion. My icq number is 345-588-777

 

[Moredhel]

While we're still looking for subs I'd like to request new cores for England - 549 775 824 801 225 152 145 139 45 65 69 111 114 116 117 118 119 120 132

 

[Rythin]

Three players missing. The session is cancelled. You guys are completely unrealiable.

 

[Formula51]

I'll sub, If you're still going.

 

[Rythin]

How about playing this Monday? Everyone's here and went somewhere for holidays?

edit: Moredhel is not a problem, he is from pagan country

 

[unmerged(30948)]

I don't know if there is a session on next monday 10 Jan.
There wasn't any reply in tlast days ...

 

[unmerged(30948)]

Again!

I don't know if there is a session on next monday 17 Jan.
There wasn't any reply in the last days ...

 

[Lurken]

Sorry Elio Vasa, it seems that this game is dead as a dodo. Unless something happens.