Whilst I to may have my reservations about this document, for the sake of stability and the unity of England, I call upon all representatives present at the conference to sign this document.After much time spent wrangling people into action, and making a frantic peace deal in the name of returning home to the Channel Islands, Philippe has been successful in getting support from prominent members of the Blancists and the former ENA or atleast he thinks so. Originally he was planning to publish this via some unknown toady, but lately he feels as though doing it publicly as himself would either give him more credit or give him a good excuse in resignation to escape Guenevere and return home for good. To that end he glances at those he has been speaking too privately and announces his proposal for the Conference to be adopted:
1) The date for free and open elections for the Estates-General.
To be scheduled for July 1889, with time for rebuilding to occur and militias to be disbanded to prevent intimidation at the ballot whether this intimidation be potentially by Faction, ENA or Blancists.
That it be enshrined that the electorate qualifications can only ever be loosened to allow more voters and never tightened to remove the right to vote from those that previously could or would have been able to.
2) The charges against Lemarque, his government, and a trial so that they will be tried according to the laws of the Dual Monarchy.
All plotters and putschists to stand trial for high treasion against the nation and its people and equally for all those who died in the bloodshed that happened during the recent civil strife. The maximum sentence, death, should be available if decided upon by the judge.
3) The charges against d'Esperey, and whether he is culpable despite his part in bringing an early end to the conflict.
d’Esperey to have a fair and free trial with no sentence limitations, for the crimes of high treason against the nation and its people and for the bloodshed caused by the war he helped instigate. The Judge to ofcourse take his peace role into account but equally remember how he helped instigate the conflict and death should remain a possibility if the Judge deems it to be needed.
4) Whether Henri XI shall remain on the throne and, if not, his successor.
Henri XI is to be invited back on our behest, and will have a re-coronation in the same way as he was coronated originally to show that it is a new dawn for the Monarchy and that he is not being forced to abdicate by the will of the parties involved. If his understanding that he is just as much King of the English and French as England and France is such that he will not submit to this recoronation, that he should abdicate.
Should Henri reject this, then we shall go the next 4 in line to the throne. If they all reject this then there should be a referendum on Monarchy or Republic. Following a monarchy result there should be further referenda on either the Duke of York or the Legitimist candidate.
5) The constitution of the Dual Monarchy in relation to the Crown, including non-monarchist alternatives.
That the previous proposition by myself be taken in this regard with the monarch losing many of their current powers, with some to be potentially returned via law of the Estates General if future monarchs prove able to resist the temptations of removing someone they personally dislike. That a republic only be instated in a republic chosen by the chain of events possible above, and that any future attempts to bring about one require unanimity from all the federal governments of the Dual Monarchy.
That the monarch shall appoint the (Lord) Chancellor based on the recommendation of the Estates-General, and this shall be enshrined as not just working principle but fact of governance and that the Monarch must appoint a Head of Government who might pass a resolution of confidence in the Estates General.
In addition, that the fundamental freedoms of public assembly, the free and unmolested press and the free speech and thought of all citizens along with their expression be enshrined as guarded by the Monarch as one of their royal duties. That all people are entitled to a free and fair trial according to the laws of our nation, and that all people are confirmed in their property rights as private citizens on the same merits. Finally as the last of these principles, that while the Monarch will ofcourse retain the majority faith of Roman Catholicism, that the general freedoms won after the Wars of Religion be maintained by the constitution and by Royal Blessing of all these. That these freedoms and their protection be the ultimate duty of the Monarch and the Monarchy in our glorious nation.
6) The future of the internal democracy of the Dual Monarchy, including the relationship between the constituent nations and further devolution of national governments.
That the Dual Monarchy invest seven distinct devolved assemblies or councils, 3 under the aegis of the Kingdom of England, 3 under the Aegis of the Kingdom of France and one under their own aegis with the Kingdom of Navarre. These devolved councils to have their own powers, for them to them have a Royal Assembly elected for the whole of the various kingdoms and then to have a union cabinet and assembly, the Union Estates-General, for the whole monarchy across the Three Kingdoms. As such the English Parliament is to become this for the whole of the Kingdom of England new National Assembly this for the Kingdom of France and for the Kingdom of Navarre the new Legebiltzarra. The full seven federal governments to be the Principality of Wales, the Principality of Albion (Anglois Areas) and the Grand Duchy of Northumbria (English areas) in the Kingdom of England. The regions in France to be the Duchy of Brittany, the Sygarian Region/Soissons State and the Grand Duchy of Occitania. Kingdom of Navarre having the Euskadi Country. These federal regions should form as lower houses for the upper house equivalent in each Kingdom's Royal assembly in the English Parliament, the French National Assembly and the Basque Legebiltzarra (or Basque Parliament). That for the seven regions the leader’s title is just Speaker of the House/President of the Assembly, that for National Governments the title is Prime Minister or equivalent in the local language and that for the Union government the leader is the Chancellor or Lord Chancellor dependent on their status in terms of birth.
That the regional devolved assemblies and councils to (the 7) have control over educational and cultural issues, with infrastructure and nationalisation to the national/royal assembly(the 3/2.5) and foreign relations, military matters and foreign trade to be the purview for the union assembly and cabinet. That the Union government also have the ability nationalise industry and companies, either as private entities or nationalise royal industry and companies to the central/union government’s control, and be able to fund and subsidise key industries or projects needed as they see fit. Taxation shall be the remit of all bodies with their ability to tax according to their desires for their own purview, such that people are taxed by 3 bodies; Federal Tax for Education and Cultural Heritage issues and maintenance, National Tax for infrastructure issues and national economic projects and Union/Central Tax for the military and for the direction of Union funds to keep the bureaucracy running and for trade deals and Union economic projects.
And that we should enshrine in our system the idea that this union is fundamentally voluntary even if no explicit legal mechanism for separation is put in place. With the unanimous consent of all local regions under a royal/national government, the national government may be abolished and the regions placed directly under the Union government, with the local regions taking over the powers previously allotted to the national/royal government to use within their own devolved regions. The regions may also unanimously within themselves vote to abolish the local devolved regions and only have the national/royal government in terms of local government.
In order to prevent the abuse of power by governments higher than any assembly in a manner harmful to the people of the Dual Monarchy, a special process can be triggered that will cause snap elections in the higher assembly being challenged and the lower assemblies that were part of the challenge. This process is formally caused by a 2/3 minimum of the assemblies responsible to the higher one voting for such a move. This move is to be called “Censure of the Assembly” and will thus need for example, Albion and Wales support to trigger elections in the English Parliament and will cause them upon this theoretical to cause National/Royal elections and elections in all responsible assemblies; which in this case would be Northumbria, Albion and Wales. In a similar way, the royal governments of say Navarre and France can trigger snap elections in all the royal assemblies and also in the Union/Central Estates-General.
That the constitution for which this monarchy is governed by be modified by the actions either of the motion being brought up in the National/Royal governments by a 2/3 vote or by a 50% vote in the Union/Central assembly. That any changes should be formed into a new constitutional document and then this new amended constitution be approved or rejected by the assembly. No amendments may ever be made, but for the replacement of the constitution with a new one as provided for by this mechanism.
7) The relationship between the Dual Monarchy and the Second Irish Republic.
That the Second Irish Republic be recognised in that it is no longer governed as the Lordship of Ireland as a constituent part of the Dual Monarchy, but that the current dictatorship be regarded as a corruption of their liberty-based aspirations and that we support the Irish people who had acted against perceived repression and not this Red Tyranny. No offensive action is to be taken.
8) The creation of democratic safeguards to prevent the events of 1886 from reoccurring.
That there should be the creation of a national unit of guard to safeguard not just the Lord Chancellor or the wider national cabinet of the whole Dual Monarchy but the constitution that will be ratified by this conference and later by the governments itself. This guard should be the size of 16,000 men with 7,000 to be in Paris and Londres and 2000 in Bilbao. This guard to be recruited locally from the various constituent parts of the country. That these members swear an oath to the Dual Monarchy, the Constitution of our illustrious Monarchy and the cabinet of the Dual Monarchy and in that order of preference. Members to take this oath upon joining this corps, and upon the incumbency of a new cabinet. This corps and guard to be known as the Royal Constitutional Guard.
9) The method in which the conclusions of the Conference of Laon will be ratified by the citizens of the Dual Monarchy.
That all decisions to be made here will be accepted by popular referendum before the Estates-General reconvenes.
So says, Philippe le Marquand. And he calls to action all people to vote on this peace proposal such as the good Jacques Smith of my own faction, and to Bosier and the Blancists and to the Prime Minister and his Deputy of the English.
This can be our resolution, and all of you had privately supported this compromise, so publicly I ask that you endorse this and we may end this conference and all return home!
OOC: If you wish to support this proposal, then you need to "co-sign" it by posting yourselves here in the thread saying as much in some manner such that this may be endorsed and the Conference be ended.
Honi Soit Qui Mal y Pense!
I, Henry Lawrence Bennet, hereby sign this proposal.