Hello.
I have just run into a situation where the recently added front merging leads to a very annoying outcome: In order to get my army to the front, it needs to march through enemy territory. During this time, it counts as in exile, which means it arrives at the front with near zero organization and 100% supply shortage. This is stupid. In the old system, there would be two different fronts here, and I could actually deploy my army to one of them, which would make way more sense.
In my opinion, one of these changes should be made:
-> Make sure an army does not walk through enemy territory in order to deploy to a front.
-> Don't merge fronts where armies would need to walk through enemy territory to deploy there.
-> Don't give penalties for exile and no supply when deploying to a merged front.
I have just run into a situation where the recently added front merging leads to a very annoying outcome: In order to get my army to the front, it needs to march through enemy territory. During this time, it counts as in exile, which means it arrives at the front with near zero organization and 100% supply shortage. This is stupid. In the old system, there would be two different fronts here, and I could actually deploy my army to one of them, which would make way more sense.
In my opinion, one of these changes should be made:
-> Make sure an army does not walk through enemy territory in order to deploy to a front.
-> Don't merge fronts where armies would need to walk through enemy territory to deploy there.
-> Don't give penalties for exile and no supply when deploying to a merged front.
Attachments
- 2
- 1