• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

peleliu

Second Lieutenant
88 Badges
Mar 30, 2010
163
119
  • 500k Club
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: By Blood Alone
  • Hearts of Iron 4: Arms Against Tyranny
  • Imperator: Rome Sign Up
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings III: Royal Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Cities: Skylines
With the discussion regarding the new Professionalism additions perhaps it is time to address mercenaries in general. I don't mind them and find them useful in the early game, but perhaps the pool of available units should be tied to institutions. Feudalism would have the base level, Renaissance a small bonus, and later institutions would see the merc pool slowly drained as nations head toward the endgame and professional/revolutionary armies. Reliance on mercs did die off fairly rapidly as nation states grew. Troops such as the Hessians used in America are best represented by the Condottieri mechanic.
 
Upvote 0
Given the high number of causalties on each battle and how small is the Manpower for most nations not to forget how little Military developpment actually gives MP wise, I can't really agree with a low Mercs Number.

It isn't unusual by 1700 to have more than 100.000 dead on each side in a major battle. Lowering the Mercs would basically render a country unable to bounce back.

In short: I'd totally agree with a Merc smaller pool for a better Manpower scaling through the game and less causalties overall.
 
Last edited: