Thank you for all these answers !
I will try to answer all of you
@fanoI :
Yep, you're right, but too powerfull :c
Indeed!
Very complicated what you propose! While I appreciate the interest. After, to be quite frank, I worked on HRE first, when I started modding it may be, now that I'm a little more confident, rework, I grant you~~
And I grant you for your work!
This could be a pseudo code:
Code:
potential= {
the_emperor_is_dead_viva_the_emperor = yes # Not exists yet a way to understand when a ruler dies! But
Captain Gars has worked on it and so in the future patches...
NOT = {
has_character_flag=king_of_the_romans # ==> This is indentation
}
}
allow= { } # Whatever...
effect = {
holder_scope =
{ has_landed_title = e_ hre } =
{ # ==> This is indentation
==> Another tab/ 4 chars as the code in after a '{'
any_de_jure_vassals = {
set_liege = e_kingdom_of_the_romans
# Another instruction? It goes here!
}
}
# Now the HRE is in scope so...
destroy_landed_title = THIS
e_hre = { active = no } # Only re-creatable via decision
give_landed_title = e_kingdom_of_the_romans
}
}
I know it is annoying to "indent" the code but now do you see that it is more readable? It is pretty clear that is wrong that a "}" is absent for example (and I pretend to have written wrongly by my free will
Another trick if you have to much "conditions" and you reach this point:
Code:
{
# The paper is ended how I indent? I cannot and now :eek: ? Ouch my ass!
your code is wrong or at least inefficient, so you need to change it
(note that a "true" programmer has only 80 characters horizontal at disposal for 40 vertical, so no you cannot expand the file... the "terminal" connected via serial has ended!)
As a young musician has the regulus to play the piano and when it does wrong the Magister will shout "Ritmo!" a Software Engineer should indent or the Senior Engineers would byte (indeed) his ass... it is from this that the term "byte" came probably
For the kingdom of Aquitaine, is not, and this is normal. If you are the king of France, your goal is to integrate land of other kingdoms (or the Empire ! Barrois like) to yours. But if you're emperor, you argue the imperial level rather than the kingdom. For example, the Empire was almost always composed of the Kingdom of Italy, Kingdom of Arles, later of the Kingdom of Bohemia and the "Regnum Romanum" (improperly called "kingdom of germany") and with a blur on the Lotharingia side, whose Philip and Charles of Burgundy tried to reactivate.
Well one could argue that the Hapsburg Emperors tried to integrate Bohemia and Hungary in their Empire but effectively this happened after the end of HRE itself... probably they would have broken "the vassal contract" doing this being the "true" Emperors :blink:
Never an emperor of this or that "kingdom" attempted to annex to his others. On the contrary, there is a strict observance of kingdoms, for example if we take the King of Bohemia Charles IV, it is one of the last emperors have been crowned in Arles !
OK so if as Emperor of HRE and King (Emperor) of France I have Aquitaine in PU I cannot never integrate it via decision?
But were not the Karling themselves to create the title and then destroy it some time after to absorb it in the Kingdom of (West) France?
Well at least should be true the Holy Roman Empire should force other Kings to enter in the Empire for example in 866 Bohemia should be not de jure part of Holy Roman Empire but "independent" (more of this later
For English, you're right, but I appreciate not really the globish / engrish. I would even like my mod is translated into proper English, and why not in other languages
OK, we try to translate from your true French in a quasi "true" English if it exist yet (the "true" English? Probably in Bombay?)
Idendation? I must confess that my limits in English just appeared!![]()
Indeed I should have written "indentation"! As the thing you have in your mouth the dents.
Chrétiens is the world for Christian, it's the "s" who disappeared ^^
Now I understand why the English and us Italian use this Latin via French word in this way: we say a poor Christian / a poor Christ to intend an "unlucky" / "weak" / "retarded" guy... now it is clear why we use in this sense. The more I know
For Padishahlari-i-rumeli, is actually based on the original attempt of the Ottoman Sultans after the fall of Constantinople to the capture of Egypt. Indeed, they presented themselves as the heirs of the Byzantine emperor, including the traditional representation of donation monastery but also in titular (Kaysar-i-rum). Then they switched to a more "traditional" universal caliphate goal (after Egypt) but the originality of these sultants as Mehmet II, when he said to the Pope "No, nothing has changed, in fact we are like the Byzantine", is great, and i have a great desire to represent it in the game.
And my scope as player is to delete any Osman and Turk tries to do this
"Nothing has a changed"? Well if the end of the world is nothing yes, that simpatic this Mehmet, right
@fedrikslicer : The problem is that "Kalmar Union" is a modern name. I search for sources of time and political thought of the time. Unfortunately in France, very few of my colleagues working on the medieval Scandinavia (no one actually: D)
The North, maybe? North Sea Empire?
The (High) Kingdom of the Normans make me think to an Empire based on Normandy...
@Ruwaard :
Thanks ! Yes, the French players were initially very difficult to understand why I removed, what is in my eyes horrors, empires of Italy / France / Britannia etc., but after a beautiful presentation of one of my friends on the concept of Imperium in medieval thought, they soon realized that there can be one and one empire, which is the Roman Empire (= christian empire). After it is divided, which is not good in medieval thought, and give some "ideas" to some emperors as Frederic II barberousse for unite the roman empire by the strengh.
We were reach a Political / Opinion divide IMHO the ahistorical Empires are historical (BUM)
Why?
Let's see: Britannia (yes Roman Prefecture), Francia (yes Roman Prefecture called Gallia so big that was split in 3 parts: Gallia Belgica, Gallia Septimania and Gallia Aquitania!), Hispania (yes Roman Prefecture again), Italia (well this is the nucleus of the Roman Empire itself, see it as the Western Roman Empire and now it is true that is existed, right?), Carpatia (yes Roman Prefecture called Illiria).
Note that if formed they should be called not Empires but Kingdoms and ruled, mind you, by Kings! But a King of All Britannia would claim the Roman Heritage and if the Popes likes him more that the Holy Roman Emperor? Or if he creates his own Pope? Who is the "true" Holy Roman Empire? The Great War of Holy Roman Empire Succession could start
Then we have the not Roman based one:
- Wendish Empire, this IMHO has sense only if we talk of Slavic Pagans! Or for a Prussian Catholic that wants to not eat the Germany from inside but eat Poland. This is clearly a filler, indeed.
- Russia this existed and claimed to be the third Rome, this should be in game (only if Byzantium is dead, I'll add this condition "Constantinople is held by not Christian character").
- Tartaria yes if you see as a possible Cuman Horde / Bolgar Horde / Great Kazharia.
- Persia well this is the ancient enemy of Rome, it was effectively reformed in the game period... as a sort of Islamic Theocratic Monarchy in the end.
- Arabian Empire it exists but probably should be divided in three parts (Arabia proper, Levant and Greater Egypt / North Africa), the ub€r Empire should be formed as the Roman Empire via special decision (blood of Moahamed, Muslim schism mended and so on).
- The Indian Empires probably only India is correctly an Empire but in India any petty King was an Emperor (Maraja) so in the end our western model is not fitting anymore I fear here
hmy:
@all : Thank again all for your messages. I do not how I will organize all know, but I think setting up something in the coming days
OK we all wait with excitation
- 1