Creepy, I was literally just thinking about Carthaginian names only a couple of hours ago. Any chance of Numidian names as well? 
You can be helped; I’ve got a few. Unfortunately, I have no female Numidian names at the ready.Any chance of Numidian names as well?![]()
Greek Names in the Ptolemaic Realm
I am not a specialist but Kleopatra isn't very Greek in my opinion.
As good as never. The Greeks/Macedonians were cultural snobs. The vast majority of them didn’t know more than a dozen words of the Egyptian language and would probably have had vast troubles pronouncing it. They did for instance not even use the Egyptian names for native Egyptian towns – and it is usually these names by which these ancient towns are nowadays still referred to in the western world. The city of Memphis (Greek name) was for instance called something like Mennofer in native Egyptian.Did greeks ever adopt native egyptian names?
I am not a specialist but Kleopatra isn't very Greek in my opinion.
The city of Memphis (Greek name) was for instance called something like Mennofer in native Egyptian.
Male Praenomina
Romans had a very limited number of first names, and some among them very used only very rarely. ...
...
Titus R
Tiberius R
Had I known that you know Coptic/Ancient Egyptian, I would have spared myself the lengthy explanation. I myself am but a dabbler in Ancient Egyptian.The native name for memphis survives into coptic as /'menfə/ or /mən'fe/, depending on how you interpret the orthography. In earlier phases it would have been pronounced /min na:fir/ "beautiful stable."
That would make Barbara also Egyptian.Ok, ok. I give up
Thought about it, because of the "ra" at the end of the name.
Quite astute points – I don’t hesistate to damit that my division into rare and common is less than ideal. But than any division of of something that has got a gradual transition into two sharply-defined groups is bound to be somewhat arbitrary – exactly where do you draw the line between common and uncommon?I'm slightly surprised of your considering these two names as rare. I'm only an amateur in Roman History, but AFAIK, they were fairly common names. Specially the first, Titus, so common as to be abreviated with a single T. in inscriptions.
Moreover, I don't think the name Appius, (almost) strictly limited to the gens Claudia, was a commonly used name. Only the long and outstanding preeminence of that gens during republican times has made it familiar to us.
In an onomastically perfect mod, though, “Appius” should be a rare name for everybody but a Claudian, for whom it should be exceedingly common.
But then every single Roman noble house would have to have its own list of rare and common names, as each had naming traditions of its own.
Also would you consider renaming the roman laws to greek ?
I wonder if this can be done by simply repeating the more common names several times? For example, have "Gaius" appear 3-4 times for every instance of "Titus" in the list - since the game chooses words from the list at random and doesn't make any real distinction between them other than the fact that they are separate words, then in theory you could actually differentiate between the more common names and the less common names.“Tiberius” and “Titus”, and also names like “Manius” and “Servius” and “Sextus”, were certainly more common than “Mamercus” or “Opiter” or “Volumnius”. But then they were much more uncommn than “Gaius” and “Lucius”, or “Marcus” and “Publius”. A finer distinction than just “common” and “rare”, probably into four groups, would do the matter more justice. I was just reluctant to do that, as I don’t even know if modders can implement any distinction; I feared that the list would get cluttered and hard to read with too many distinctions, and possibly all for nothing. But if a modder can positively inform me that commonality of names can be implemented, I’ll be happy to rework the list of Roman surnames into four groups.![]()