We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Necroposting a bit (I've been wanting to use that term... ).
I was going through the strategic bomber model names, and some of them seem to be a bit out of place. The planes placed in the same category seem to be a bit too different from one another.
The french model 10_0 is not really a strat bomber. while the british one could barely fly in a straight line. Also, the model for 10_1 for Britain is a lot different from teh german one, being able to fly longer and varry a lot more bombs, while the french model barl qualifies as a strat bomber.
I think we should remove the french 10_0 and place the 10_1 model in 10_0, and 10_2 in 10_1. For ENG, find some bomber other the Kennedy Giant for 10_0, use the Handley-Page O/100 or O/400 in 10_1 instead of teh H-P V/1500, and use V/1500 for 10_2. The german ones seem good.
Again with this, but this time on tactical bombers. I checked the german model names, and the improved model, the LVG C.VI, doesn't even seem to have been a bomber. I can only find it as a recon plane.