• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Originally posted by Demetrios


Wasn't Gneizno considered the capital during the early period?
Hmmm. In XI century, the capital was where was ruler with his court. It hapenned to be Gniezno most of the time in the first half (well, it was bishopric or something like that), but it wasn't 'real' capital. In fact, it quickly lost it's postition as capital to Krakow, and even the main city of Wielkopolska became Poznan.

I don't know when it changed. Gradually, i suppose, and probably even before feudal partition. But i'm not sure. I suppose some halibutts will soon correct me:D
 
Originally posted by Nikolai II


The most likely should be cost in $$$ and temporary lapse in some sort of control. (Taxes, mustering, whatever)

What about stability? I don't remember if there is stability like in EU and I'm too lazy to look it up. :eek: Anybody knows?
 
Originally posted by DarthMaur

Hmmm. In XI century, the capital was where was ruler with his court. It hapenned to be Gniezno most of the time in the first half (well, it was bishopric or something like that), but it wasn't 'real' capital. In fact, it quickly lost it's postition as capital to Krakow, and even the main city of Wielkopolska became Poznan.

I don't know when it changed. Gradually, i suppose, and probably even before feudal partition. But i'm not sure. I suppose some halibutts will soon correct me:D
I think it changed after the Bretislav of Bohemia invasion in the middle of 11th century, when Gniezno was pillaged. The returning army of Kazimierz Odnowiciel (the Renewer ? :p) settled in Krakow for good.
 
Originally posted by Martinus

I think it changed after the Bretislav of Bohemia invasion in the middle of 11th century, when Gniezno was pillaged. The returning army of Kazimierz Odnowiciel (the Renewer ? :p) settled in Krakow for good.


Martinus, now you know why I asked you this question a few days ago :D
 
I'd like it. If you really covet some province..or some city, you should be able to move your court there. The Ottomans sure did. :D Sure, that's outside this timeframe, but.

can anyone think of a time between 1066 and 1419( or is it 53?) that some kind of battle and acquisition of territory led to the royal court being moved to this new area?

Hmm. Frederick II ruled from Sicily as opposed to Germany, didn't he? I mean he was FROM germany and spent his youth there but I read he had some dream of ruling a unified Italy from his court in Sicily.

So at the least it should be an option.. :D

I always had this DREAM in EU1 of turning the Austrian capital to Rome. But we can't move capitals in europa universalis voluntarily and I didn't know how to edit files back then... :eek:
 
Originally posted by jaron
I'd like it. If you really covet some province..or some city, you should be able to move your court there. The Ottomans sure did. :D Sure, that's outside this timeframe, but.

can anyone think of a time between 1066 and 1419( or is it 53?) that some kind of battle and acquisition of territory led to the royal court being moved to this new area?

Well Constantinople was actually the fourth Ottoman capital, so there's an example within Crusader King's timeframe :)

Sögüt was the original capital, then Bursa in 1326 and later Edirne (Adrianople) in 1365---until the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
 
Originally posted by jaron
cool! so there is a lot of moving around. like I dont know what i want to do yet but i think this game will be cool. i hope it has a lot of provinces. no world conquest AARs for this one! :D

IIRC 1500 has been mentioned, and I thing EU2 is at 1600-1800?