• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Yeah I agree. It was usually the less powerful tribes in history that migrated further to escape the powerful ones.

Yeah but from a gameplay perspective you don't want to punish success.
 
  • 3
  • 2Like
Reactions:
Yeah I agree. It was usually the less powerful tribes in history that migrated further to escape the powerful ones.
Leave it to PDX to be as historically inaccurate as it can be, doing the exact opposite.

Just two examples off the top of my head that is exactly the opposite of what PDX did, Magyars defeating Bulgars to settle in Pannonia when in reality Bulgars and their Pecheneg allies defeated Magyars which is what caused them to migrate. Pechenegs themselves migrated in the first place because Uzes (Oghuz? But I’ve also seen posts in the forum they are Cumans) pushed them with help of Khazars but PDX’s eurocentric way of portraying will not change even with nomad specific dlc despite several people bringing this forward.

Moving your estate to a theme giving bonus to appointment score when it was the exact opposite. While it may not have been enforced as vigorously as it could’ve been, strategos of a theme (maybe tourmaches and other subordinates too? I don’t know about them) was forbidden from acquiring lands in where they were posted and forbidden from marrying to local families.

So, as I said, leave it to PDX to do the exact opposite of the historical thing, they have a knack for it, almost purposefully trying to be as inaccurate as possible.
 
  • 3
  • 2
Reactions: