• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
admiral drake said:
like i told daniel on icq think i'm intrested and i prefer 1453

as i told in Armagedon thread, when we started to use this scenario, i might consider balance in 1453 is not good, sorry, Drake. France (+BUR) and Otto has upper hand on domination too much. Poland as well.
 
Gamlasemlan said:
I thought that Ironfist said that someone with character should start a new thread??? :confused:


:p


Semlan is officially banned from this thread!! :rofl: :p

J/K


admiral drake said:
discussing rules i propose
culture claiming
core claiming
stabhit rule
alliance rule
max amount of provs you can take in a war or loose wichever
ontime bonus

Ok my views on this
Culture claiming.If the majority wants it then we'll have it i never liked it and still don't like culture claiming:) maybe what to discuss is will we have 50% of the provinces ,more or less. and how many 1 or 2 seems enough.

Core claiming. well Core claiming is harmless and fun. To be able to claim a core u need to own it for X years and have the same culture as in the province. and u can't claim colonies. or we'll work that u can only get a core from AAR rewards but u still need the same culture.

Stabhitrule shall we have the regular one with 3 years at war -3 stab and 99ws or like the one in C&C3 .

Alliance rule - never fun to have big human alliances. takes away the fun of the game.

Max amount of provs. This is a rule i hate and love. Most of the time hate it but i have always seen it benefits. i would vote yes on this rule and i suggest we have 3 prov limit that will increase over time. having different provs counts has different also.

On time- will be the usual 1 deflation and -3 bb

ARR reward?

and yes i kinda agree that this game will be free of edits except the rewards. deals and more will have to be ingame so people will suffer BB and losses of stab as a punishment ;)

all the answears are just sugestions nothing have been decided yet.

Daniel will come up the usual rules and explotations.
 
Dr Bob said:
And watk3.1 is teh suxx0r, I guess you'll have to balance the players as carefully as possible.

Making a new religion.csv, goods.csv and province.csv and thus create a specific multiplayer mod would solve it.

If I am still playing EU2 in 2007, I will prolly give it a shot.
 
ok so far we have
Me
Daniel
Admiral Drake
FJ
Lemeard
Ironfist
Aleksidze

and maybe the Evil Dr BoB

hmm that makes 8 1 or 2 more for a complete crew but enough to set up a game

Lets discus these rules also

Spanish going bankrupt or will we just have a inflation rule like the one in Armageddon and other games.
In 1575 and 1650 I will edit in 1% inflation for each 3 gold mine you own outside Europe. TP's count too.

land locked slider?

shall we have random leaders?



and it looks like i'll be GM with Daniel as i gotta try atleast once before eu3 ;)
 
we should have the land slider locked tbh its alot more fun in general

if yo sleep the bancrupty events and use that rule then everybody is ffected and spain stil get most of the inflation it ussually gets
 
Tonioz said:
as i told in Armagedon thread, when we started to use this scenario, i might consider balance in 1453 is not good, sorry, Drake. France (+BUR) and Otto has upper hand on domination too much. Poland as well.

well not everybody is gonna turboannex burgundy like hg did in armageddon
and kj in ottos kinda expected to have a strong ottos
 
FAL said:
Aleksidze,

Your signature is too big. Please reduce it to 10 lines maximum at 1152*864, per the signature forum rules.
Done, sorry about that. :(

About Burgundy in the 1453 scenario... why don't we merge it with Austria??
 
Aleksidze said:
Done, sorry about that. :(

About Burgundy in the 1453 scenario... why don't we merge it with Austria??

would solve alot of issues i gues
 
because we got 8 players and maybe more i've posted the gmae thread. Me and Daniel have discussed and made some rules but still some need to be discussed because we disagree on some:)
 
If start date is pushed back to 1815 UTC/GMT I'd be interested as well. I'd prefer a vanilla 1492 or 1520 start though, although I'll accept a 1453 and or WATK map as well. 1419 is defintely out.