The "Peasant Shogun" comes along at about the same time as IRL.........and it doesn't change the aims of the non-Empire in the name of the emperor.
- 2
He gets the land for free since he doesn't use up diplo slots.I usually never release nations, but after seeing your success here, maybe I need to. You get all that land for free basically because of no AE.
The Ottoman war was anticlimactic. Spain/Austria seems like it will be a much bloodier affair.
Releasing nations and vassalising them seems to work very well for you.
I usually never release nations, but after seeing your success here, maybe I need to.
I think my toughest foe will be France. Because they are allied to my allies ,Genoa and Venice , who I would lose and have to fight.The Ottoman war was anticlimactic. Spain/Austria seems like it will be a much bloodier affair.
It's always nice when one rolls a Vauban.And thanks to general Ikeda and his +6 siege skills, things by and large went according to plan
Weird that the UI lied. Must be, as you said, the cost was too high for the manpower calculation. You'd think it would just add +1 to each regardless of cost.
How did that come about?the Genoese province of Ceuta
Inconvenient. Looks like you will have to get a province in the New World.And we note that the Aztecs are apparently an Empire, and therefore will also need to be destroyed.
He's also a Turenne ( 6 shock , 6 fire).It's always nice when one rolls a Vauban.
Indeed. The Pope must be pulling his hair seeing how eager the new princes are to join the heathen Japanese.That 'crusade' didn't end well for the Catholics...
How did that come about?
Inconvenient. Looks like you will have to get a province in the New World.
I'm guessing there'll be a war for those colonies at some point.Europeans started to colonize in Malacca , and the Indonesian Trade Company based there lost its majority control of provincial trade power, and therefore its merchant.
Couldn't you have told your vassals to not engage?Just simply agreeing to the call but not doing anything was not practical, as the vassal swarm was certainly going to help Persia quite a bit even if Oda herself did nothing.
Yes and no. Even if completely passive ( the "zzz" setting in vassal screen), Persia's enemies would waste their time and manpower sieging the Daimyos down , instead of fighting Persia. The AI appears to pick on the weaker enemy nations in war and avoid the stronger ones ( which makes sense).Couldn't you have told your vassals to not engage?
Shogun government is OP . IMHO, least "grinding" method to do World Conquest . If I ever attempt The Three Mountains, it will be via shogun strat.Oda is unstoppable.
I don't think there is a notification for it, this happens to me all the time with trade companies that are floating around 50%. Usually if I'm collecting I use one of the two base merchants that I know won't disappear, I've had this same exact thing happen to me too many times to countI played the next chapter and hope to post in next 24 hours . But before I move on i wanted to talk about the merchant loss issue and ask what people do about it.
As I mentioned I lost a merchant when my trade company in Malacca went under 50 % . My first question is if there is a message / alert that notifies about this .
My second question is whether people allocate specific merchants to a node or just treat all merchants interchangeably. Because what happened in the last chapter is that the lost merchant was the one collecting in Malacca , and all the other ones were pushing trade to him. So I had no income from any of those merchants for 3 years. I would have preferred to lose the one in Moluccas or Phillipines for example. Since that happened , I allocated the merchant I gained from global trade to Malacca ( so he will never be lost) and will send the one from trade company to a less important node like Girin.
I don't remember - were you unable to move market capital? Else just move your trade capital to Malacca so you always have your baseline pickup?I played the next chapter and hope to post in next 24 hours . But before I move on i wanted to talk about the merchant loss issue and ask what people do about it.
As I mentioned I lost a merchant when my trade company in Malacca went under 50 % . My first question is if there is a message / alert that notifies about this .
My second question is whether people allocate specific merchants to a node or just treat all merchants interchangeably. Because what happened in the last chapter is that the lost merchant was the one collecting in Malacca , and all the other ones were pushing trade to him. So I had no income from any of those merchants for 3 years. I would have preferred to lose the one in Moluccas or Phillipines for example. Since that happened , I allocated the merchant I gained from global trade to Malacca ( so he will never be lost) and will send the one from trade company to a less important node like Girin.
No, I have not moved the home node yet. I am not sure it is net plus. I have 90% of Nippon, but only 50% of Malacca.. So pushing from Nippon to Malacca may lose money But I guess I can always just collect in Nippon with a merchant anyways. So maybe I'll move it in next chapter.I don't remember - were you unable to move market capital? Else just move your trade capital to Malacca so you always have your baseline pickup?
Absolutely . That will be done in the chapter I am about to post.I'm guessing there'll be a war for those colonies at some point.
Or you could foward Nippon to Malacka (through Hangzhou as the merchant-cheapest route or a more convoluted one if it would be better) - non-TC pickup used to be pretty minor compared to TC pickup, and 50% trade rate in TC with a much bigger cake to slice from is defo better than 90% of a small cake.No, I have not moved the home node yet. I am not sure it is net plus. I have 90% of Nippon, but only 50% of Malacca.. So pushing from Nippon to Malacca may lose money But I guess I can always just collect in Nippon with a merchant anyways. So maybe I'll move it in next chapter.